今日已更新 237 条资讯 | 累计 31065 条内容
关于我们

AI 资讯

AI人工智能最新资讯、模型发布、研究进展

16445
篇文章

共 16445 篇 · 第 791/823 页

HackerNews

Ask HN: I found out that I'm about to be laid off. How do people find jobs?

Using a throwaway account right now for obvious reasons. I have a friend at my company that has access to some insider stuff who (subtley) tipped me off that I'm on the chopping block for upcoming layoffs. Obviously, I'm trying to resume-spam now, but I am pretty sure that cold applying to companies doesn't work anymore, because every job posting is immediately botted to shit (and a lot of job postings are fake anyway). So...what do people actually do to find work now? Is it really just going th

wwwthrowaway256 2026-05-29 01:50 👁 2 查看原文 →
Reddit r/MachineLearning

Your Agents Are Aging Too: Agent Lifespan Engineering for Deployed Systems [R]

Are agents aging after deployment? : https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26302 On a new longitudinal deployment benchmark, switching the Claude Code CLI agent from Sonnet 4.6 to Opus 4.7 dropped PyTest pass rate by ~15%. This (to me) is a counterintuitive-enough result to pay attention to. The authors built AgingBench , to measure how coding agents hold up over a long deployment, not just on a single task. On their S7 coding scenario, swapping the backbone model from Sonnet 4.6 to Opus 4.7, within the same Claude Code CLI harness, produced a 15% mean drop in PyTest pass rate across the deployment horizon. Their argument is that this is a longitudinal effect, not a raw-capability one. The benchmark stresses how an agent's memory state evolves over many sessions (compression, interference, revision, maintenance shocks), and a stronger base model doesn't automatically age better under a given memory policy. In fact, memory policy alone drove a 4.5x spread in agent half-life across scenarios, which is larger than any model swap they tested. All to say: "newer model, just swap it in" may not be a safe upgrade strategy for long-lived agents. More details and a runnable benchmark: https://agingbench.github.io Does this reflect your experience with long-lived agentic deployments? submitted by /u/CategoryNormal149 [link] [留言]

/u/CategoryNormal149 2026-05-29 01:41 👁 6 查看原文 →
HackerNews

Show HN: Py-SQL-cleaner – format SQL embedded in Python strings

Hi HN, I built py-sql-cleaner, a CLI for formatting SQL embedded in Python files. Python formatters handle Python syntax. They do not format SQL written inside Python code. On the other hand, SQL formatters usually target SQL files or raw SQL text, not SQL embedded inside a Python file. Still, I think it is not uncommon to find long SQL queries inside Python codebases. py-sql-cleaner detects embedded SQL inside Python files and works only on that SQL. The main things it can do are: find the SQL,

enumura 2026-05-29 01:30 👁 3 查看原文 →
HackerNews

Ask HN: What Is an "AI Engineer"?

I'm seeing an enormous contingency of my LinkedIn connections change their titles to "AI Engineer." I know for a fact that they're not working on any models or even AI workflows, they're just building apps and backends using AI tools like Claude. Is that what "AI Engineer" means nowadays? Is that what companies are looking for when they open recs for "AI Engineer"? Should I be marketing myself as an "AI Engineer" just because I'm very efficient using modern AI tooling to build good non-AI softwa

seattle_spring 2026-05-29 01:26 👁 3 查看原文 →
Reddit r/artificial

Anthropic releases Claude Opus 4.8 with improved agentic reasoning, honesty, and a new "dynamic workflows" feature in Claude Code

Anthropic just dropped Claude Opus 4.8 today, an incremental but meaningful upgrade over Opus 4.7. Here are the highlights: Model improvements Better performance across coding, agentic, reasoning, and knowledge work benchmarks Significantly improved honesty: the model is reportedly ~4x less likely to let flaws in its own code go unremarked compared to Opus 4.7 Alignment assessment shows lower rates of deceptive or misaligned behavior, on par with their Claude Mythos Preview model Scores 84% on Online-Mind2Web for computer use and browser agent tasks, ahead of both Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 New features launching alongside it Dynamic workflows (Claude Code): Claude can now spin up hundreds of parallel subagents in a single session to tackle large-scale problems like full codebase migrations. Available for Enterprise, Team, and Max plans. Effort control: Users on claude.ai can now choose how much compute effort Claude puts into a response, from faster/cheaper to deeper/slower. API update: The Messages API now accepts system entries inside the messages array, letting developers update instructions mid-task without breaking prompt cache. Pricing Same as Opus 4.7: $5/M input tokens, $25/M output tokens. Fast mode (2.5x speed) is now 3x cheaper than it was for previous models, at $10/$50 per million tokens. What's next Anthropic mentioned they are working on bringing Mythos-class models (currently in limited preview for cybersecurity use cases under Project Glasswing) to general availability in the coming weeks. Full details and system card: anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8 submitted by /u/Direct-Attention8597 [link] [留言]

/u/Direct-Attention8597 2026-05-29 01:03 👁 5 查看原文 →
The Verge AI

Claude’s new model is more ‘honest’ when it messes up

Anthropic is releasing Claude Opus 4.8 on Thursday, and the company is touting the model's "honesty." According to Anthropic, it trains "all [its] models to be honest - for instance, to avoid making claims that they can't support." But it notes that "a general problem with AI models is that they sometimes jump to conclusions, […]

Jay Peters 2026-05-29 01:00 👁 7 查看原文 →