AI 资讯

TRIESTE, Italy – For developers, system administrators, and digital hoarders alike, the daily struggle of locating a specific snippet of text buried deep inside hundreds of nested project files is a universal headache. While heavy-handed IDEs and clunky terminal commands exist, they often feel like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Enter FiXiY, a lightweight, blazing-fast utility designed to do exactly one thing flawlessly: scan a folder and find precisely what you’re looking for inside the files. Created by software engineer Lorenzo Battilocchi (known online as XeroHero), FiXiY has officially launched as a free, open-source project on GitHub. Simplicity Meets Speed Unlike built-in operating system searches that are notorious for missing code snippets or taking ages to index, FiXiY bypasses the bloat. It provides a localized, no-nonsense approach to file-content searching. Users simply point the tool to a folder, type in the phrase, string, or code block they need, and FiXiY maps out every instance across all supported file types within seconds. "As developers and creators, we waste an incredible amount of cumulative time just navigating our own file structures looking for a variable, a configuration line, or a specific piece of text," says creator Lorenzo Battilocchi. "FiXiY was built out of necessity. It’s a nimble, friction-free alternative for anyone who wants instant answers without waiting for a massive IDE to load or fighting with complex regex syntax in a terminal." Key Features of FiXiY: Deep Folder Scanning: Recursively searches through complex directory trees and nested folders seamlessly. Intelligent Text Matching: Pinpoints exact strings of text, code, or data buried within plain text, source code, scripts, and logs. Lightweight Footprint: Operates with zero background bloat, making it perfect for rapid-fire asset hunting on any machine. 100% Open Source: Built transparently for the community, ensuring full privacy with no data leaving your local mac

Anthropic has closed a $65 billion Series H round at a $965 billion post-money valuation, marking what could be the AI startup's final private fundraise before a highly anticipated IPO.

Hey DEV community! 👋 A few days ago, I built a VS Code extension called Marksmith to fix the most annoying parts of writing Markdown (like pasting Excel tables and syncing preview scrolls). But recently, I noticed a huge shift in my own workflow: Half the Markdown I write isn't for humans anymore. It’s being fed directly into Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini as prompts and context. When you're constantly stuffing docs into context windows, two things happen: You worry about hitting context limits (or racking up API costs). You waste time dealing with AI "hallucinations" when you ask it to generate docs back for you. So, for the v0.3.0 release , I decided to pivot Marksmith into something new: An Agent AI-Ready Markdown Toolkit. 🚀 Here is what I added to survive the AI era: 📊 1. Real-time LLM Token Estimator Instead of just counting words, Marksmith’s Document X-Ray sidebar now includes a Heuristic Token Estimator for GPT, Claude, and Gemini. Before you copy-paste that massive README into your AI assistant, you can see exactly how "heavy" it is in terms of tokens right inside your editor. No more guessing if you're about to blow past your context limit! ✂️ 2. Copy Optimized for AI (1-Click Minify) Formatting is great for humans, but LLMs don't need all those extra spaces, perfectly aligned markdown tables, or empty lines. I added a CodeLens button at the top of your files. Click it, and Marksmith instantly minifies your Markdown (compresses tables, strips blanks) and copies it to your clipboard. Result: You save significant tokens and API costs without ruining your beautiful local .md file. 🕵️ 3. Hallucination Quick Fix Ever ask an AI to write documentation, and it leaves behind a bunch of [TODO: Insert link here] or makes up a fake local image path? Marksmith now automatically scans your document and puts a red squiggly line under AI placeholders and broken local links . Click the 💡 icon, and you can instantly strip them out or fix them. It acts as a safety net before you

DevSecOps Pipeline — Completion Runbook All code is written and pushed to GitHub. This runbook covers the remaining operational steps: Terraform applies, GitOps ARN updates, and ArgoCD deployment. Prerequisites Install these tools if not already present: # AWS CLI v2 winget install Amazon.AWSCLI # Terraform 1.6+ winget install HashiCorp.Terraform # Terragrunt # Download from https://github.com/gruntwork-io/terragrunt/releases # Place in C:\Windows\System32\ or add to PATH # kubectl winget install Kubernetes.kubectl # ArgoCD CLI winget install argoproj.argocd AWS Profile Setup The root terragrunt.hcl uses profiles named myapp-{env}-{region_alias} . Configure them in ~/.aws/config : [profile myapp-production-use1] region = us-east-1 role_arn = arn:aws:iam::591120834781:role/AdministratorAccess source_profile = default [profile myapp-production-usw2] region = us-west-2 role_arn = arn:aws:iam::591120834781:role/AdministratorAccess source_profile = default [profile myapp-staging-use1] region = us-east-1 role_arn = arn:aws:iam::690687753178:role/AdministratorAccess source_profile = default [profile myapp-staging-usw2] region = us-west-2 role_arn = arn:aws:iam::690687753178:role/AdministratorAccess source_profile = default [profile myapp-dev-use1] region = us-east-1 role_arn = arn:aws:iam::557702566877:role/AdministratorAccess source_profile = default [profile myapp-dev-usw2] region = us-west-2 role_arn = arn:aws:iam::557702566877:role/AdministratorAccess source_profile = default PHASE 1 — Terraform Applies Work from the myapp-infra/ directory. Run in the order shown — capture outputs for updating GitOps files in Phase 2. 1.1 WAF (production + staging) # Production us-east-1 terragrunt apply --terragrunt-working-dir live/production/us-east-1/waf # Output → webacl_arn (copy this value) # Production us-west-2 terragrunt apply --terragrunt-working-dir live/production/us-west-2/waf # Output → webacl_arn (copy this value) # Staging (no GitOps ARN needed, but good to have) terra

Author's note: In the spirit of fairly critiquing AI and practicing a suggestion I end the article with, this article and the accompanying illustration were created entirely without AI assistance. Agentic coding AI is here, and it’s transforming the software industry. But with agentic coding out now for over a year, has it felt like the software industry has really transformed? From my from vantage point, although there are some really cool projects that have been built only because of new agentic coding tools, it generally feels like we’re awash in a sea of software slop. Tim Kadlec wrote a great article, “Losing Focus” , that really resonated with me, especially this quote: “I don’t think the quality of software has increased all that much in in the past 12 months. I think maybe the amount of software has, but it’s very, very hard to find software that’s reliable.” - Max Scoening, Head of Product at Notion I’ve been hearing loads of stories and murmurs about AI from the people I know in tech, and I think there’s a lot being lost in the binary divide that a lot of people seem to fall into - either AI is bad and can do nothing right, or AI is the new future of engineering, and every company should have all their code written by AI today . I want to posit that right now we’re in the messy middle. An era of hype and grifters that want to sell you an AI fantasy that hasn’t been reached, which obscures the real present - powerful AI tools that can speed up professional developers, but can lure non-developers into shipping products that aren’t nearly ready for prime-time. My Background But first, if you don’t know me, let me explain why you should listen to my perspective. I’ve been working professionally in software (specifically web development, focused on the frontend), for over ten years. In that time I’ve worked at a non-profit, a for-profit, led a small startup, freelanced, and have led a number of open-source volunteer teams at Chi Hack Night , including right now

Hey , I've been building VeritasReason — an open-source Python framework that adds a structured reasoning and provenance layer on top of LLMs and AI agents. The problem it solves: AI agents today make decisions but record nothing. When something breaks in prod, you have zero audit trail. What it does: • Context Graphs — queryable graph of everything your agent knows + decides • Forward-chaining rule engine (YAML rules, no code required) • W3C PROV-O provenance — every answer traces back to its source fact • Policy compliance: ask "Which purchase orders violated SoD policy in Q1?" • Works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, Ollama, any LLM 30-second demo: pip install veritas-reason veritasreason-policy-demo GitHub: https://github.com/bibinprathap/VeritasGraph PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/veritas-reason/ Happy to answer questions — built this for regulated-industry AI (healthcare, finance, legal) where "trust me bro" answers aren't enough. — Bibin submitted by /u/BitterHouse8234 [link] [留言]

The same agent, same prompts, did markedly different work on two codebases I work in. One has a test suite that runs in eight seconds. The other takes twelve minutes. The eight-second project gets a careful, iterative collaborator. The twelve-minute project gets a confident guesser. I noticed it first as a vibe. The agent in the slow codebase would write five files at once, then announce the task complete without having run anything end to end. The agent in the fast codebase would write one function, run the tests, react to the failure, fix it, run them again. Same model. Same configuration. The only difference was how expensive it was to learn whether the previous step was right. That is the whole post in one sentence. An agent's effective intelligence is bounded by how fast it can verify its hypotheses. Cut the verification cost and you raise the agent's apparent IQ. Raise it and you lower the agent's apparent IQ. The model in the middle is unchanged. Why this binds harder for agents than for humans A human engineer can hold a hypothesis in their head. "I think this works. I will check it later." The cost of holding the hypothesis is roughly free; the human has institutional memory, intuition, a sense of what the code does that does not require running the code to confirm. They can defer verification without losing fidelity. An agent cannot. It has no intuition about your codebase. The only ground truth it has access to is what the tests say, what the type checker says, what the build says. When those signals are cheap, the agent uses them constantly. When they are expensive, the agent stops using them and starts speculating. Speculation by an agent looks plausible. It produces code that compiles, follows the patterns it has seen in your repository, names things sensibly. The problem is that plausible is not the same as correct. The agent that speculates is shipping a guess; the agent that iterates is shipping a tested answer. From the diff alone, they can be hard

Pre-orders are opening up for Slate, the Spirit Airlines of EV trucks

Everyone is adding AI to their product right now. Most of them are doing it wrong. Not because they chose the wrong model. Not because they used the wrong library. But because they treated AI integration like a regular feature and skipped all the engineering discipline that production systems require. I have integrated LLMs into multiple production applications. This is what I wish I had known before I started. The Mental Model Shift You Need First A traditional API call is deterministic. You send a request, you get a predictable response. You can write tests against it. You can cache it. You can reason about it. An LLM call is not deterministic. The same input can produce different outputs on different runs. The model can refuse, hallucinate, or return output in a format you did not expect. Your system needs to be designed around this reality, not in spite of it. This means defensive parsing, fallback logic, output validation, and graceful degradation are not optional extras. They are the core of the feature. Choosing the Right Model for the Right Job The biggest LLMs are not always the right choice. I learned this building EditDeck Pro, an AI creative platform for music. Some tasks needed a large frontier model for nuanced creative output. Others needed a fast, cheap model that could run many times per session without accumulating significant latency or cost. The pattern that works: Use a lighter model for classification, extraction, and short structured outputs. Use a larger model for generation tasks where quality matters more than speed. Route dynamically between them based on the task type. This can reduce your inference costs by 60 to 80 percent on workloads that mix simple and complex tasks. Prompt Engineering Is Software Engineering Prompts are code. They should be versioned, tested, and reviewed like code. I store prompts in a dedicated module with version numbers. When I change a prompt I run it against a fixed evaluation set of inputs and compare the out

I was looking at my bank statement one day and realised I was paying for 4 things I completely forgot about. Combined it was around 40 euros a month just silently leaving my account. I'm a 17 year old developer from Cyprus and I spent the last few weeks building Capsule, a simple subscription tracker that shows you everything you pay for, alerts you before renewals, and tracks how much you save by cancelling things. No bank connection required. You just add your subscriptions manually. Privacy first. It's not on the Play Store yet but the waitlist is live at capsule.crickdevs.com if anyone wants early access. Would genuinely love feedback from real people before I launch.

AI workflow automation looks simple in demos. A form submission comes in. An AI model reads it. The CRM gets updated. A Slack message goes out. An email is sent. But once you move from demo to production, the workflow becomes more sensitive. What happens if the AI summary is wrong? What happens if the CRM is updated with incomplete data? What happens if the customer request needs human approval before the next step? What happens when a workflow fails halfway? That is where AI workflow automation needs better architecture. In one recent project, we designed an AI workflow automation system using: Make.com for workflow orchestration FastAPI for custom backend logic OpenAI/GPT APIs for summarization and structured output Monday.com CRM for record management Slack for internal notifications Gmail for email-based communication Human review steps for approval and control The goal was not to build a chatbot. The goal was to reduce repetitive manual review work while keeping the workflow controlled, traceable, and practical for daily business use. The workflow problem The original workflow had several manual steps: A new request came in. Someone reviewed the request manually. Important information was extracted. A CRM record was created or updated. The internal team was notified. A follow-up email was prepared or sent. The team tracked the workflow manually. This kind of workflow is common in service businesses, operations teams, sales teams, and CRM-heavy processes. The pain was not that any one step was too difficult. The pain was that the same steps repeated again and again. That makes the workflow slow, inconsistent, and dependent on manual copy-paste work. Why not fully automate everything? The obvious idea is: Let AI read the request and update everything automatically. But that can be risky. AI-generated output can be incomplete, overconfident, or slightly wrong. That may be acceptable if the output is only a draft. It is not acceptable if the output directly updates

Every Linux PHP developer knows the dance. You need to switch from PHP 8.1 to 8.3. You run your sudo commands, update your global symlinks, and then realize your local development server in the other window just crashed because it was running on the old version. Why should managing PHP versions be a system-wide struggle? The Solution: Per-Shell Version Isolation phpvm brings the seamless developer experience of tools like pyenv , rbenv , or nvm to the PHP ecosystem on Linux. Instead of changing /usr/bin/php globally, it uses a lightweight shim directory prepended to your PATH . When you call php , the shim inspects your environment variables and forwards the execution to the correct binary. It supports three layers of resolution, falling back gracefully: Shell pin : Pinned manually via phpvm shell <version> Project default : Resolved from .php-version or composer.json requirements when you cd into a directory Global default : The system fallback managed by update-alternatives Effortless Provisioning No need to look up repository installation guides. The built-in installer automatically detects your distribution (Ubuntu or Debian) and configures the appropriate upstream repositories (Ond?ej Sur�'s PPA or deb.sury.org ) to fetch the exact CLI and FPM packages you need. Polish in v2.5.1 Our latest release focuses on making the environment rock-solid: Tray App Auto-Start : Spawns the GTK desktop tray app immediately after installation by resolving the graphical session environment from active processes. PATH Priority : Actively prevents IDEs, login shells, or snap profiles from overriding the shim's position in PATH . Clean Cleanup : Ensures all background processes are terminated during uninstallation. Getting Started You can install or upgrade using the interactive script: curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rijverse/phpvm/main/install.sh | sudo bash If you are already running v2.5.0, simply run: phpvm --self-update Check out the project website, or find the

Motorola’s latest Razr Ultra proves that its flip foldable format has evolved to become more than just a nostalgic gimmick. I’d understand if you’re not interested in shelling out $1,499.99 for the 2026 model, but the similar 2025 Motorola Razr Ultra with 512GB of storage is a much more palatable $699.99 unlocked at Best Buy […]

Large exchanges are designing derivative products around AI tokens, which are increasingly being considered less a computational output and more a raw material input, like electricity or bandwidth.

the video generators are becoming much more powerful, only unemployed people can track the changes ( like me).. Here are the current observations, and add anything in the comments if you feel I missed something. Cinematic Videos Seedance 2.0 : This Chinese model is fantastic in real visuals and advanced visuals, almost like real shots. I guess this will become the future. Kling 3.0 and kling motion transfer: Motion transfer is amazing, you shot a vidoe yourself and can trasfer the movement any avatar. Kling is the king in that aspect. With Kling’s motion transfer, . There is no other technology that can do this this well and look super fantastic. Veo3 : Recent releases of Veo 3.1 are still some of the best videos. Sora has shoted down by openai, and recent Google model, - GeminiOmni , is the best in video editing. It is like Nano Banana for videos. It is absolutely fantastic. Don’t compare this with Seedance because the purpose is completely different. If you try it on your own video and ask it to add something, it gives a super realistic output. Explainer Videos These are not cinematic, but mostly for concept explanations and long videos. These tools are great fit: Distilbook : This one is very good at creating visual explanations with whiteboards and animations based on your content, PDFs, and all. If you want long videos, like 3-minute or 5-minute training videos,academic this is purpose-fit. NotebookLM Video overview : This tool has the video overview option, which makes things much easier for you. It is mostly for slide-type videos, but it still gets your work done because most of the time you may not need animated videos. MathGPT: Here it is mostly for math educational video explanations using some animations. These are not very advanced, but still, if you want cheap educational videos, maybe it can do the job. Images In my personal opinion, - The recent GPT image model is fantastic. Second, the Google model Gemini Nano Banana Pro and Nano Banana Flash 2 are b

As Apple tries to shrink Gemini for the iPhone, a cloud component is probably inevitable.

I have spent the last few months working on infrastructure and tools to give agents global ids, and the ability to communicate. That is up and running now, but actually structuring their work together has been a real pain: I still have to give them roles and responsibilities, and start the agents in the right directories with the right id so that the actually get things done. I have automated that part now: a team can be bootstrapped from a template with one command: aw team bootstrap https://gi

For a long time, I thought productivity was about effort. Work harder. Focus more. Stay disciplined. Manage time better. Most productivity advice is built around some version of this idea. Then I noticed something strange. Some days I could spend ten hours at a desk and accomplish almost nothing. Other days I could spend three hours working and make more progress than I had all week. The difference wasn't effort. The difference was context. The Most Expensive Thing Is Not Time Ask people what their most limited resource is and most will answer: Time. But for knowledge workers, engineers, researchers, writers, and designers, I think the scarcer resource is often something else. Mental state. The ability to hold a problem in your head. The ability to remember why a decision was made. The ability to see connections between ideas. The ability to continue a train of thought without interruption. That's the state where meaningful work happens. And it's surprisingly fragile. Every Context Switch Has a Cost Imagine you're debugging a difficult issue. You've already: read the logs inspected the code traced the requests formed a hypothesis You're finally starting to see the shape of the problem. Then: a Slack notification arrives someone schedules a meeting an email requires attention a different task becomes urgent The interruption itself might only take two minutes. The real cost is what disappears. The mental model. The momentum. The partially constructed map inside your head. The next time you return to the task, you don't continue where you left off. You rebuild. Software Often Creates The Problem It Tries To Solve One thing that surprised me after building products for years is how much software exists primarily because other software creates friction. A note-taking application exists because memory is limited. A task manager exists because priorities change. A research assistant exists because information is fragmented. Many tools are not solving fundamental problems.

HEY, so im trying to connect my chatbot (Custom Coded) to instagram API using webhooks but im unable to test it my pm2 logs shows (second image) and in my first image, i feel like the AI is just completly lying because i have been trying this for 2 days and he keeps on adding stuff and stuff now its just saying you cant test in development at ALL my facebook and instagram is connected facebook account is also connected to developers facebook and i believe so everything is enabled from my side My thought process is that im using wrong APP_SECRET and ACCESS_TOKEN combo because there are like 4 places that can be used to generate access token and ID and app secret and its so badly designed that i cant figure out what is what. very frustrated honestly. submitted by /u/Jumpy_Paramedic2552 [link] [留言]