OpenAI disrupted a Cambodia-based scam operation using ChatGPT to support investment, romance, gambling, and impersonation schemes.

Most of the engineers consider documentation as an after-thought; a README on a finished system written in the final 20 minutes before a PR gets merged. That's the wrong way to do this relationship. Documentation is not a description of architecture. It is part of the architecture, and marking it as separate is the cause of so many rotting systems, which still pass all tests. The compiler doesn't care, your team does It could be a consistent codebase and yet it be undocumented garbage from the point of view of anybody who didn't write it. Only one sort of correctness is enforced by the compiler (or interpreter): does this code perform the operation that the instructions say it performs. It doesn't weigh in on why a specific table contains a deleted_at column, versus a hard delete, or why a service tries 3 times with exponential back-off, versus 5 times with a fixed interval. Those decisions include constraints that are not apparent in the diff, regulatory, historical, or performance. If these are only in the mind of the programmer who wrote them, the actual architecture is partially undocumented, and these constraints will be breached as soon as someone else messes with the code when it is under a tight deadline. Architecture is not only the shape of your services and schemas, it's the set of decisions and constraints that shape stayed within. Undocumented constraints are like walls that we don't see, or know about. They are walked through without anyone knowing they exist, and one of the assumed conditions is broken at a time. Documentation as a design artifact, not a report Good documentation should be done prior to and/or in the midst of implementation, not after. When writing a design doc that explicitly states the problem, the options you considered, the one you selected, and the tradeoffs you made, you are actually doing real design work, you are making mistakes in your thinking process that would only become apparent during production. There have been more ti

From the outside, social features seem like something straightforward: follow a user, like a post, see a feed, but when you attempt to implement them at any real scale you find that every single one is something you've got to be aware of, a pattern, a well-documented query pattern with all its failure modes. Here's a step-by-step look at four of them: adjacency list, fan-out feed, mutual-friends join, and some graph traversal that SQL wasn't really designed for. The adjacency list and why "who do I follow" isn't free A follow relationship is usually modeled as a plain adjacency table: follows(follower_id, followee_id, created_at) . That's the whole schema, and it's deceptively adequate for a long time. The first place it breaks is when you need "who do I follow that also follows them", mutual connections, because that's a self-join against the same table: SELECT f2 . followee_id FROM follows f1 JOIN follows f2 ON f1 . followee_id = f2 . follower_id WHERE f1 . follower_id = : user_id AND f2 . followee_id != : user_id ; This query is ok if the fan-out is low. It feels like it's no longer fine when a few accounts have a few hundred thousand joins, because join now needs to walk a correspondingly large intermediate result set per request. The typical solution isn't a better query, it's a better index and a cap. composite indexes on (follower_id, followee_id) and (followee_id, follower_id) so both directions of the join hit an index-only scan, plus a LIMIT applied early so the planner doesn't materialize more rows than the response will ever use. The fan-out feed problem The “social systems” hard problem is the timeline: display to me my feed of what people I follow posted recently, in order. There are two ways to construct it and they are both right - anything else and outages happen. Fan-out on write means that when a user posts, you insert a row into every follower's feed table immediately. Reads are then a trivial SELECT * FROM feed WHERE user_id = :id ORDER BY creat

Learn how to build professional PDF reports in Odoo 19 using QWeb . This guide covers everything from creating your first report to advanced techniques like reusable templates, custom paper formats, barcodes, multilingual reports, RTL support, and performance optimization. Introduction Every Odoo application relies on reports. Whether you're printing: Sales Quotations Customer Invoices Purchase Orders Delivery Slips Manufacturing Orders Inventory Labels Payroll Documents Custom Certificates you're using QWeb , Odoo's XML-based templating engine. Although creating a basic report is straightforward, building maintainable, scalable, and professional reports requires understanding how the entire reporting pipeline works. In this tutorial, we'll build a complete report from scratch while exploring best practices used by experienced Odoo developers. By the end of this guide, you'll be able to: Create custom PDF reports Understand how Odoo generates PDFs Design reusable templates Display relational data Build dynamic tables Format currencies and dates correctly Add company logos, images, barcodes, and QR codes Create custom paper formats Pass additional data from Python Optimize report performance Debug common QWeb issues How Odoo Generates a PDF Before writing any XML, it's important to understand the report generation process. User clicks "Print" │ ▼ ir.actions.report │ ▼ Report Model (_get_report_values) │ ▼ QWeb Template │ ▼ Rendered HTML │ ▼ wkhtmltopdf │ ▼ PDF Download Each step has a specific responsibility: Component Responsibility ir.actions.report Registers the report Report Model Prepares business data QWeb Generates HTML wkhtmltopdf Converts HTML into PDF Understanding this workflow makes debugging significantly easier. Project Structure A clean module structure helps keep reports maintainable. my_module/ │ ├── models/ │ └── sale_order.py │ ├── report/ │ ├── sale_order_report.xml │ ├── report_action.xml │ └── paperformat.xml │ ├── security/ │ ├── views/ │ └── _

Two people asked a context compressor two completely different questions. It gave them the same answer. Not a similar answer — byte for byte the same 544 characters. Here's what that looked like: query="Fix the IntegrityError on commit" level=L0 -> 159 tok cache_hit=False query="Explain the tax rounding TODO in compute_tax" level=L3 -> 159 tok cache_hit=True identical output: yes (544 chars both) Different question. Different compression level. Same 544 characters, served from cache. Finding it I wasn't looking for this. I was auditing something else entirely — measuring how much meaning a context compressor loses, not how fast it runs. My harness feeds the same corpus through the compressor with different queries and checks which critical substrings survive: file paths, error types, line numbers, identifiers. I noticed two rows in my results table were identical. Same token count, same output. My first assumption was that my own harness had a bug — that I was passing the same query twice and hadn't noticed. So I changed the second query to something with no words in common with the first, and bumped the compression level from L0 to L3, which should change the output dramatically on its own. Same 544 characters. That was the moment it stopped being my bug. The cause One line: sid = content_hash(content) That sid was doing two jobs. It was the shadow ID — the handle used to refer to a stored document. And it was also the cache key. As a shadow ID it's correct: the same content should get the same handle. As a cache key it's wrong, because the output of compress() doesn't depend only on the content. It depends on the content and the query and the compression level. Two of those three inputs were simply not part of the key. So the first caller warmed the cache for a piece of content, and everyone who touched that same content afterwards got the first caller's answer — regardless of what they actually asked for. Why this is worse than a stale cache A stale cache gives y

Hello Everyone, I'm the creator of PyBotchi, an intent-based AI Agent Orchestrator. In this post, I will discuss some key concepts why I created it. A little bit of background first. I'm a solutions architect with 10 years of experience as a software engineer. Most of my work are high throughput, high reliability, low cost and low latency services. This is while making it simple and readable to improve it's maintainabality. When I'm designing a system, I usually prioritize these concerns. You may assume this is my bias in relates to AI Agent building. I'm also Claude Certified Architect (Foundation) and I found that PyBotchi aligns almost identical to Anthropic's core agent recommendations. TL;DR: PyBotchi is an lightweight, async-first Python framework that uses nested Pydantic models and OOP inheritance to turn LLM intent detection into clean, deterministic business logic without the overhead of complex graph orchestration. Why I created PyBotchi? I really believed that traditional coding can already solved what client's need. The only limitations we have is how we read the input and how we show the output. In most cases in web services, your API use JSON, XML, etc with their respective specification/structure. Input Analogy Assume you have created a Books CRUD endpoints (FastAPI with Pydantic). Your create endpoint will have a define specifications for book creation to have a validation and avoid user errors. Most of the time you will also validates sessions and permissions which also included in the request. If you want your chat bot to support those, you just need add those endpoint as intent (tools). If your model tool selection are able to detect intents. You are more "close" to being deterministic. "Your services will have 50 endpoints or more. You will flood your tool selection call" In your frontend UI, you segregate panels/forms/inputs in their respective pages. You don't usually join multiple intent in a same page. Cluttered UI will make your UX confusin

A spreadsheet containing laptop serial numbers is not proof that every endpoint is managed. It proves only that someone created a spreadsheet. For an audit, customer security review, onboarding check, or incident investigation, the evidence needs to connect four facts: The organisation expects the device to exist. The device is assigned to an accountable owner or lifecycle state. A management or monitoring control is actively reporting from it. The reported evidence is recent enough to support the decision being made. A device can appear in an asset register while being absent from the management platform. It can also appear in the management platform while belonging to a former employee or reporting data that is months old. Control objective: Maintain a current, reconciled inventory of expected endpoints, managed endpoints, owners, security state, and unresolved exceptions. 1. Define what "managed" means before counting devices Teams often use the word managed without an operational definition. That creates false confidence. An endpoint should not count as managed merely because an agent was installed once. For a company-owned laptop, a practical definition normally requires all of the following. Criterion Minimum evidence Identity Hostname, serial number, hardware identifier, operating system, and management record can be tied to one device Ownership Named user, department, custodian, stock status, repair status, or retirement state Control Expected MDM, RMM, EDR, or other endpoint control is enrolled and associated with the correct organisation Freshness Last check-in and evidence timestamps fall within a documented threshold Posture Update, encryption, firewall, antimalware, restart, and other required states are known Accountability Deviations have a reason, owner, approval, target date, and review history A device that fails one criterion should not disappear from the report. It should remain visible as an exception. 2. Reconcile three sources of truth No sing

hey there, so i wanted to share something with you. this is a bit personal but i have been watching the news this week and bruh... things are not going good. i am jobless right now, no other source of income, and day by day things are getting worse. and the worst part? AI is literally fuking every job in the software field. so when i saw this week's stock market drama, it hit me different. Microsoft popped. Meta tanked. Same AI boom. Two completely opposite reactions. and all i could think was... yeah, this is exactly my life right now. The Numbers, Bruh let me break it down real quick because this is wild: Microsoft jumped like 15% after beating expectations. Azure grew 43%. full year Azure revenue crossed $100 billion. insane. Meta dropped 8–9% after missing on guidance. their free cash flow collapsed 91% year-over-year to just $784 million. like... 91%?? gone. same AI boom. same crazy spending. and the market said "you're amazing" to one and "you're done" to the other. Why Microsoft Won Microsoft actually showed receipts. they didn't just talk about AI, they showed the money coming in. Azure is growing, Copilot is making real revenue, investors can literally see the line between billions spent and billions earned. lesson? Wall Street doesn't hate AI spending. it hates AI spending without proof. Why Meta Lost Meta's problem is that nobody can see where the money comes back. Zuckerberg talked about the "AI capacity dilemma" — how much compute to keep for yourself vs sell to others. but guidance missed, free cash flow went to hell, and the market was like... nah bro, i need answers. and honestly? i relate to that feeling more than i want to admit. putting everything into something and people still saying "not enough." The Bigger Picture this week is a preview of everything coming. companies are dumping hundreds of billions into data centers, chips, and models, all betting AI demand keeps exploding. the ones who can prove it pays off? they get rewarded. the ones who

I built a zero-config CLI that deploys the current folder to a live site. Anonymous by default, with a single-use claim link if you want to keep it. Every static hosting tool I've used asks for the same ritual before you can see your site online: create an account, verify an email, install a CLI, log in, answer a config wizard. That's a lot of ceremony for "put these files on a URL". So I built hosting — a CLI where the entire flow is: npx hosting That's it. No account, no config, no login. Your folder is live: Uploading 3 files (12.4 KB)... Live site: https://1freehosting.com/s/happy-panda-482 Claim link: https://1freehosting.com/claim/xxxxxxxx-... The claim-link model The interesting part isn't the upload — it's the ownership model. Deploys are anonymous by default . You get two links back: Live site — the public URL, share it with anyone. Claim link — private and single-use. Open it, sign in, and the site attaches to your account so you can manage it from a dashboard. Unclaimed sites expire 24 hours after the last deploy. That keeps throwaway experiments truly throwaway — no zombie sites, no cleanup — while anything you actually care about is one click from permanent. This inverts the usual order: instead of authenticate, then deploy , you deploy, then decide if it was worth authenticating for . Updating the same site The first deploy writes a .hosting.json file with the site's deploy token. Every later hosting run from that folder updates the same site — before and after you claim it. vim index.html hosting # same URL, new content Some details I sweated: .hosting.json is added to your .gitignore automatically (it contains the token). Hidden files ( .env , .git , …) are skipped client-side , so secrets never leave your machine. node_modules and OS junk are skipped too. Want a fresh URL? hosting --new . Deploying from CI or another machine? Grab the token from the dashboard and run hosting link <subdomain> --token <token> (or set HOSTING_DEPLOY_TOKEN ). Commands C

As USB-C becomes the standard across most devices, it's time to go through that drawer full of USB adapters and toss those you no longer need.

Table of Contents Introduction Putting the 10x Claim Into Perspective How Did We Get Here? This Was an Extensive Evaluation The Priority Was Compatibility Why Not Rust? Why Not C#? Why Go Fit the Existing Compiler A Port, Not a Simple Translation Where Does the Performance Come From? Native Execution Parallel Processing Memory Efficiency and Larger Projects The Benchmarks Memory Usage The JavaScript API Trade Off Is It Still TypeScript? The F1 Analogy Large Companies Helped Test TypeScript 7 Should You Upgrade? Final Thoughts Introduction At the end of March 2025, I published this article: Go-ing Beyond TypeScript: Microsoft Picks Go: How Will This Change the Landscape? Giorgi Kobaidze Giorgi Kobaidze Giorgi Kobaidze Follow Mar 31 '25 Go-ing Beyond TypeScript: Microsoft Picks Go: How Will This Change the Landscape? # microsoft # typescript # go # csharp 1 reaction 2 comments 12 min read At the time, Microsoft's decision to port the TypeScript compiler to Go sparked quite a bit of discussion and controversy. Many people questioned whether moving such a critical piece of the ecosystem away from TypeScript was the right choice. And boy, did Microsoft deliver what it promised: an order-of-magnitude performance improvement on some of the world's largest TypeScript codebases. The results are here, and the benchmarks speak for themselves. Putting the 10x Claim Into Perspective The phrase "10x faster" describes the scale of the improvement Microsoft has demonstrated. It does not guarantee that every codebase will become exactly ten times faster. The results depend on the size of the project, the work being performed, and the available hardware. Some projects might see a 5x improvement, while others could reach 8x, 10x, 12x, or potentially even more. No, this doesn't make every TypeScript developer a 10x developer , But it does mean that compiling a TypeScript project, loading it in an editor, and receiving diagnostics could become dramatically faster after moving to the nat

If you subscribe to more newsletters than you read, which tool fixes it depends entirely on which problem you actually have. Most roundups skip that step and just rank apps. Disclosure up front: we make one of the eight tools below. It's the last entry, it's new, and it has no track record — its section says so plainly. The other seven are real options and for most people one of them is the better pick. Every price and behaviour here was checked against the vendor's own site on 2 August 2026 . Where a vendor doesn't publish a price, this says that instead of guessing. The two problems people both call "too many newsletters" They aren't the same problem, and the tools split cleanly along the seam. Clutter. Newsletters are burying your real email. You'd read them, you just don't want them sitting next to your bank and your on-call alerts. The fix is routing: move them somewhere else. Volume. Twenty-five arrive a week and you have time for three. Moving them changes nothing — now you have twenty-five unread items in a nicer app. The fix is either condensing the pile or deciding what's in it. Almost every tool below solves exactly one of these. Buying a clutter tool for a volume problem is the standard way to end up paying a subscription and still having the same unread count. The plumbing, since you're the one wiring it up Four mechanics show up across all eight: Dedicated intake addresses. Readwise Reader, Meco, Readless and Digest each hand you an address on their domain (Meco's look like you@mecoinbox.com ). You subscribe with it and their infrastructure receives the mail — the cleanest integration point available: no OAuth scope on your mailbox, no IMAP polling, no shared credentials. Mailbox connection. Meco will alternatively connect Gmail or Outlook and pull your existing subscriptions across, setting the selected ones to skip your inbox (reversible at any time, per Meco's FAQ). Much faster than re-subscribing to 25 newsletters by hand. The cost is a read scope

Despite predictions that AI agents could make traditional apps obsolete, developers are shipping new software faster than ever. From smarter bookmarking tools and neighborhood marketplaces to digital pen pals and nature journals, here are the latest App Store finds worth adding to your Home Screen.

I hit Ctrl-F more than any other key combination on this machine. It runs a shell function called fts — "find tmux session," which is not a good name but it's four years too late to change it. I press it, a fuzzy finder opens listing every project directory I have, I type a few characters, and I'm sitting in a tmux session for that project with the panes already laid out. If the session already existed, I'm back in it exactly where I left off. If what I typed doesn't exist yet, it offers to create it. Somebody watched me do this over a screen share recently and asked what was going on. So: here's the whole thing, the four tools it's built on, and a breakdown of every part that isn't obvious. What you'll end up with: One keystroke from anywhere to any project Fuzzy search across every repo you own, with a live directory tree preview Type a name that doesn't exist → it offers to scaffold and place it Never accidentally start a second tmux session for a project you already have open The same window/pane layout in every project, every time The problem it solves Before this, starting work looked like: cd ~/repo/work/some-project-i-half-remember-the-name-of tmux new-session -s some-project # split some panes, badly, slightly differently each time Three or four commands, one of which needed me to remember a path. None of it hard. All of it friction at exactly the wrong moment — the moment you've decided to start something, which is the moment you're most likely to get distracted instead. I'd also collected tmux sessions named 0 , 1 , 2 and some-project-2 , because I kept starting new ones instead of attaching to the one already running. So the goal wasn't really speed. It was making the right thing the automatic thing. Prerequisites Four tools plus zsh. All four are worth having on their own, and three of them are things you'll reach for daily once installed. Tool Version I'm on What it does here tmux 3.6a The terminal multiplexer. Holds the sessions, windows and panes. fz

Khi bắt đầu xây dựng một website chuyên về mô hình lắp ráp, mình nghĩ công việc chỉ đơn giản là đăng sản phẩm lên rồi bán. Nhưng sau quá trình thực hiện, mình nhận ra để một website hoạt động hiệu quả cần rất nhiều yếu tố khác. Điều đầu tiên mình tập trung là tối ưu trải nghiệm người dùng. Một website bán hàng không chỉ cần đẹp mà còn phải tải nhanh, dễ tìm kiếm sản phẩm và hiển thị tốt trên điện thoại. Bên cạnh đó, mình cũng chú trọng đến SEO. Thay vì sao chép mô tả từ nhà cung cấp, mình tự viết lại nội dung cho từng sản phẩm, tối ưu tiêu đề, thẻ mô tả, hình ảnh và cấu trúc website để Google dễ hiểu hơn. Trong quá trình phát triển, mình cũng xây dựng nhiều bài viết chia sẻ kinh nghiệm lựa chọn mô hình lắp ráp, cách bảo quản và những gợi ý quà tặng cho các dịp đặc biệt. Nếu bạn muốn tham khảo dự án mình đang phát triển, có thể xem tại: 👉 https://tiemlaprap.com Mình vẫn đang tiếp tục cải thiện tốc độ website, tối ưu SEO và trải nghiệm người dùng mỗi ngày. Nếu bạn cũng đang xây dựng một website bán hàng hoặc có kinh nghiệm về SEO, rất mong nhận được những chia sẻ và góp ý. seo #website #ecommerce #webdev #digitalmarketing

The start of a new school year can feel hectic, as parents juggle their kids’ classes, extracurriculars and sports on top of work, appointments, and other responsibilities. It’s easy for things to slip through the cracks, but Skylight’s shared smart calendars can help keep everyone on track, and from August 2nd through August 9th they’re […]

submitted by /u/fagnerbrack [link] [留言]

Struggling with audio dropout or finnicky pairing? Ensure these common Bluetooth speaker problems aren't getting in the way of your auditory delights.