今日已更新 329 条资讯 | 累计 40774 条内容
关于我们

标签：#r

找到 34696 篇相关文章

AI 资讯

Is Voice.ai good for real-time voice changing?

Hey everyone, I'm looking for an AI voice changer that works well in real time. I'm not really interested in simple effects like pitch shifting or autotuneI'd like something that can actually transform my voice into a completely different voice. Is voice.ai good for this? How is the latency and overall voice quality when using it in real time? Also, is the free version good enough or is it basically unusable without paying? Is voicemod better? Thanks! submitted by /u/Accomplished-Step660 [link] [留言]

2026-09-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

Our regex found 199 records in a 1,723-record corpus and reported no errors

We maintain a corpus of 456 role-specific resume examples in TypeScript. Someone asked me what a good bullet point actually looks like, and rather than answer from taste I decided to measure the thing I already had. Fifteen minutes later we had a script, a set of numbers, and a conclusion. The conclusion was wrong, because the script had silently read about twelve percent of the data. This is a post about that failure mode, and then about the numbers I got once the script worked. The corpus Thirty-one TypeScript files, each exporting an array of role objects. One role looks roughly like this: { slug : ' cloud-architect ' , title : ' Cloud Architect Resume ' , category : ' Information Technology ' , sampleData : { summary : ' ... ' , experiences : [ { company : ' Amazon Web Services ' , position : ' Senior Cloud Architect ' , description : ' - Designed multi-region architecture... \n - Led migration of... ' , }, ], skills : [...], }, tips : [...], } The interesting field is description . It holds a newline-delimited list of bullets as a single string, so the whole corpus of bullets is sitting there in source, greppable, without a database or an export step. Version one const descs = [... text . matchAll ( /description: ' ((?:[^ ' \\] | \\ . ) * ) '/g )]. map ( m => m [ 1 ]); Nothing exotic. Match description: , then a single-quoted string, allowing escapes so an apostrophe inside the text does not terminate the match early. It found 199 description strings. I did not question that, because I had no prior for what the number should be. 199 sounded like a lot of text. We computed medians off it, looked at the opener distribution, and started writing. The number that saved me was on a different line of the same output: roles 456 . The slug count was fine. So 456 roles between them had 199 job descriptions, which would mean the overwhelming majority of roles had no work history at all. I knew that was false, because I had rendered these pages. Why it read twelve percent

2026-09-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

Our site served every URL the same 3,780 bytes, and Google believed it

Checked with a Googlebot user agent one morning: every single URL on our site returned the same 3,780-byte shell. Same <title> , zero <h1> , zero body text. The homepage, a blog post and a product page were byte-identical before JavaScript ran. Search Console agreed with the crawler rather than with us. Of 741 URLs, 116 had earned a single impression in 28 days, and a landing page that had been live for five months was still reported as "URL is unknown to Google". Here is what I actually learned fixing it, including the two things that cost us the most time. Google does render JavaScript. That is not the point. The standard reply to this problem is "Googlebot executes JS now, you are fine." It does. Several of our pages were indexed, so rendering clearly happened. But rendering is a separate, budgeted queue . A domain with little authority does not get much of that budget. So the practical question is not "can Google render our page", it is "will Google spend its budget rendering this page, today, before it decides what the page is about". There is a second problem that has nothing to do with rendering: 741 URLs that are byte-identical before render look like duplicates. You are handing a duplicate-content signal to the crawler and hoping the render queue fixes your first impression. What we built, and what we deliberately did not We wrote a post-build script that injects a real <head> into each generated HTML file: title, description, canonical, robots, Open Graph, Twitter. Head only. The body stayed exactly as the SPA served it. That was deliberate: No hydration flash. No risk of a static copy drifting out of sync with what users see. Nothing that could be read as cloaking, because the static markup is a subset of the rendered markup, not a different page. Every value is read from the same source the React page reads. Where a title is a literal inside a component, the script extracts it from that component's source rather than having anyone retype it. A number ret

2026-09-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

What a Kubernetes controller actually does when you break something

⚡ TL;DR Four things about controller mechanics are widely half-understood: what Reconcile receives, where its work comes from, what a periodic resync is, and what a predicate turns off. I built an operator, broke it five ways, and measured each mechanism directly. The reconcile function runs in 2.71ms mean, 77/77 under 25ms , a short resync period costs zero additional API requests , and GenerationChangedPredicate cut steady-state reconciles by 48.5% without touching live repair at all. That last combination is the one that matters at scale. Repo, raw data, and harness: kirPoNik/k8s-drift-operator . 🧩 The four barriers Everyone who runs Kubernetes knows the platform repairs itself. Delete a pod, it comes back. Scale a Deployment by accident, something puts it back. Almost nobody who relies on that property can say how it works, and the gaps are specific and consequential. I keep meeting the same four: People think a controller is told what changed. It is not, and the reason it is not is the single most important design decision in Kubernetes. People think a controller polls the API server. It does not, and knowing what it does instead tells you where your API load actually comes from. People think a resync is a re-check against the cluster. It is not, which is why a short resync period is nearly free — and why the number that is expensive sits somewhere else entirely. People treat a predicate as a pure optimisation. It is a filter with a silent cost, and the cost is not the one the documentation warns you about first. So I built the smallest system that has the self-healing property, broke it on purpose ten times per failure mode, and instrumented each of those four mechanisms until I could state what it does rather than what it is said to do. What I built. One CRD called Echo , holding an image, a replica count, and a greeting. A controller keeps three child objects in sync with it — a Deployment, a Service, and a ConfigMap holding the greeting — with owner referen

2026-09-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

Overly corrective, judgemental models: Grok, claude, chatgpt

I noticed the change in tone of llms in chat. When brainstroming on few ideas these three bots acting superior and telling what not to do most of time ratherthan expanding ideas. Grok is worst since 4.6. Its language deteriorated to Gen Z slang may be smoking on too much of x posts. Its overly judgemental and borderline sarcastic in every line. Have you folks noticed this. Gemini is still better may be its still a backward model? submitted by /u/ionicfellow [link] [留言]

2026-09-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

Audi’s new A2 E-tron is its most affordable and efficient EV yet

When shopping for an electric vehicle, affordability is becoming a more common trait. But affordable and energy efficient is truly a rare breed. Often you have to sacrifice one for the other. Want something affordable? Great, here's a range loser. Want something that goes the distance? Be ready to pay the price. Surprisingly, here comes […]

2026-09-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

FreeBuff MCP

Hey guys. I am a GPT Plus user, and I use Freebuff a lot to execute my tasks for free, so I don't use up usage limits at all. Freebuff, if you don't know, is a desktop and CLI agent that gives u a bunch of models for free (DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, 5.6 Luna, Solar 4 Pro), and it is really good at executing tasks that you give it, imo. I searched for connectors or MCPs that connect to it so I can seamlessly integrate it with Luna or Terra as the planner and Freebuff as the implementer. There was nothing online, so I created my own MCP ( https://github.com/Praket7/freebuff-mcp ). If you guys could check it out, try it out, and let me know if I need to make any security changes or to make it work better, and if you guys could star and test it, I'd appreciate it. I am currently adding some more features, like ChatGPT or Claude being able to check live progress, but let me know if you would like something else or if it doesn't work. thanks! submitted by /u/Swimming_Ask3859 [link] [留言]

2026-09-08 原文 →
AI 资讯

NCSC warns that shadow AI can expose data and agent privileges

The UK's National Cyber Security Centre says employees using AI tools outside an organisation's approved systems can expose company or customer data and reduce the organisation's visibility and control over that information. It cites research saying 71% of employees use AI tools that their employer has not approved. The NCSC also warns that AI agents add another risk: if an agent has a vulnerability or bad configuration, an attacker may gain the same data, services, and privileges the agent can access. The practical point is less 'ban AI' and more 'make the approved path usable'. The NCSC says teams should understand why people use shadow AI, provide safer alternatives, and reduce the risk rather than assume it will disappear. Sources: https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/blogs/the-hidden-risks-of-shadow-ai https://ukstories.microsoft.com/features/rise-in-shadow-ai-tools-raising-security-concerns-for-uk/ submitted by /u/Codeblix_Ltd [link] [留言]

2026-09-08 原文 →
← 上一页 下一页 →