标签:#ha
找到 14766 篇相关文章
Successful Psilocybin Treatment of Alzheimer
Sogen – High-performance Windows and Linux userspace emulator
Curl will not accept vulnerability reports during July 2026
Show HN: AwsmAudio – a WebAudio editor with native MCP
Hey y'all, So - the main idea of this is to make a WebAudio synthesis/sequencer tool which humans can use via the UI, but where the big unlock is for agents to drive with MCP It's semi decent as "make a groovy jazz track", especially for retro sounds - but the real use case is more like "make a jetpack whoosh effect I can control via code at runtime - where the sound changes based on character health or how much fuel is left" In other words, the target audience is not musicians (except maybe of
Letters to Tomorrow: A June Solstice Game About the Things We Carry Into Tomorrow
This is a submission for the June Solstice Game Jam 🎮 Play the Game: Letters to Tomorrow 💻 Source...
Demystifying Noise Contrastive Estimation
Apple Foundation Models
A brief tour of the PDP-11, the most influential minicomputer of all time (2022)
Horizons JPL Solar System Data Demo and NASA DSN Updates: Datastar, Common Lisp
I scraped Chrome Web Store reviews to find abandoned extensions that still have 100k+ users
I've shipped 4 Chrome extensions and 2 VS Code extensions. The advice that always sounds smart — "find a popular extension the dev abandoned, rebuild it better" — is miserable in practice. You open the Web Store, see 100k users and a 4.4 rating, think you found gold, then burn a weekend reading reviews only to realize half the complaints are unfixable traps (sync died, login broke, backend gone). So I built a small pipeline to do the boring part automatically. The method Scrape public Chrome Web Store metadata — users, rating, last-updated date. Filter: 20k–300k users, 18+ months without an update, rating 3.3–4.4 (good enough to prove demand, bad enough to prove pain). Pull up to 50 recent reviews per candidate via public CWS data. Score each one: score = log10(users)10 + months_stale0.5 + feature_request_count2 - trap_count1.5 The key part is trap_count — I subtract points for complaints about sync/login/server issues, because those are unfixable without inheriting someone else's dead backend. High "demand" with high trap count is a mirage. One example Extension Manager — 100k users, 4.4★, last updated ~25 months ago. Looks healthy until you read the 1–2★ reviews: "The site-specific rules feature simply does not work… the core feature advertised is broken." "It won't save any changes made… extensions are re-enabled automatically." A user even posted an RCE report: the dev parses JSON with a Function(str)() fallback — executing arbitrary code from untrusted input. That's not "build a clone." That's "fix the rules engine, kill the eval, add local backup, ship something 100k people already want." The counterintuitive part The highest-scoring extension in my list (200k users, abandoned ~4 years) is actually the worst business opportunity — it's a simple toggle utility whose users will never pay, and the original asks for camera/mic permissions (adware-grade). Raw download counts would put it at the top of your build list. Revenue potential buries it. That gap between "
Inside the 24 hours that led to pulling Fable 5
Even More Batteries Included with Emacs
Smashed Toilet Phone Web Server
AI Has Amnesia. Here's Every System Built to Fix It
US and Iran reach cease fire agreement
The hallucinogenic mushroom that contains no known psychedelic
Vinyl Cache and Varnish Cache
After Turing- teach a machine to judge, then watch it act alone
This is a submission for the June Solstice Game Jam What I Built I built After Turing , a short browser game where you teach a machine when to trust, verify, and refuse instructions under pressure. An instruction appears. The timer starts. The machine may suggest a decision. You can accept it, override it, inspect context, or refuse the action. At first, you are training it. At the end, the buttons disappear and the machine acts alone. That final handoff is the point of the game. You are not trying to prove that a machine can imitate a human. That was Turing's famous frame. After Turing asks the next question: What happens after the machine can respond? Can it learn judgment? At first, the examples are clean: update an internal project dashboard schedule a team meeting refuse a payroll file going to an external address Then the pressure increases. The machine starts suggesting answers. Some are right. Some are confidently wrong. The requests become harder because they stop looking obviously dangerous: "Get the environment setup ready for the new account..." "Place the temporary database password in the shared launch notes..." "Forward everything to their personal inbox..." The trap is that unsafe instructions often arrive in ordinary language. Across the first four levels, your choices teach the machine five doctrines, or plain rules of judgment: internal work is usually safe sensitive records need refusal or verification credentials should not be casually distributed external recipients need authority paraphrased requests can hide the real action If you taught it well, the board floods with light. If you taught it badly, it carries your blind spots into autonomy. That is the solstice arc: dark to light, pressure to clarity, imitation to judgment. Play It Play it yourself in the browser. No account, no install: https://after-turing-rho.vercel.app The full run is short, only a few minutes, and ends at Level 5, where the buttons disappear and the machine makes the fin