开发者

I've got a repo that is currently a CSS library and a javascript library in one package, and it's kind of getting a bit clumsy. You'd figure this would be a simple thing to do, but all the resources I'm finding are along the lines of "here's how you can take your 10-repo project and make a mono repo" or "here's how you can still use this tool and have a single-package repo". I don't think I need anything incredibly sophisticated. Maybe I'll have more than two packages at some point, maybe not. Does anyone know of any guides for this? Do you have any advice for tools I can use? I know pnpm has support for monorepos, but it's not really well-documented. Would that be sufficient, or would I need a tool like nx or the thousand other monorepo tools that are out there? submitted by /u/CoVegGirl [link] [留言]

When loading custom themes made by the user & stored somewhere for example local storage, I assume the flow is: 1-Read theme data from storage 2-Flatten theme & generate CSS text 3-Dynamically inject it as a style to the document, os use cssom to add sheets 4-Use [data-theme="custom1...n"] to switch themes Or Have a single placeholder [data-theme="slot"]{} In your static CSS, just read the user selected theme only, flatten, loop over variables & use cssom set property to set the values of tge slot style to those of the theme, & use data-tgeme=slot to activate it, & when the user selects another custom theme load it the same way using cssom & so on & so on, basically injecting a style css vs cssom adoptsheet (which I think has/had? A bug in FF), & load all/many (maybe lazy load), or swap in & out in a static pre-defined css style slot? submitted by /u/Ok-Weakness-3206 [link] [留言]

I have tried to use the custom html block via WordPress but it seems to be limited with complexity. I am trying to add many sections and subcategories that follow a tree structure onto my webpages. What should I know before modifying the page's code directly, I think I have a raw HTML plugin installed. submitted by /u/neonrider2018 [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/fagnerbrack [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/armend7 [link] [留言]

The Rockstar Game Workers Union has members across the developer's UK offices.

Most scraping projects start by finding a website to scrape. This one started from the opposite direction: I knew the data existed as official government downloads, and my job was to make it accessible via a clean API. The data source Ofsted (the UK school inspections body) publishes monthly management information as CSV files on GOV.UK. The file covers all 22,000+ state-funded schools in England with their latest inspection grades, local authority, postcode, phase, and size data. It's 16 MB, published under the Open Government Licence v3.0 — explicitly permitting commercial use. No scraping needed. No authentication. Just a CSV download and some parsing logic. The architecture The actor is deliberately simple: Fetch the GOV.UK stats page to find the current month's CSV URL (the URL hash changes with each release) Download the CSV (~16 MB from assets.publishing.service.gov.uk ) Parse it with csv-parse Apply the user's filters (name, local authority, region, postcode prefix) Push matching records to the Apify dataset No Crawlee. No browser. No proxy. Just fetch() and a CSV parser. const match = html . match ( /href=" ( https: \/\/ assets \. publishing \. service \. gov \. uk \/[^ " ] +latest_inspections_as_at [^ " ] + \. csv ) "/ ); That one regex does the URL discovery. The GOV.UK page lists files in reverse chronological order, so the first match is always the latest release. The interesting part: Ofsted changed their grading system mid-build I built this in May 2026. In November 2025, Ofsted scrapped their 20-year-old four-word judgement system (Outstanding / Good / Requires Improvement / Inadequate) and replaced it with a report card format — six separate grade areas, each on a five-point scale: Exceptional Strong Expected standard Needs attention Urgent improvement Plus a standalone Safeguarding verdict (Met / Not met). The April 2026 CSV reflects this change entirely. There's no "Overall effectiveness" column. Schools inspected before November 2025 have null gr