今日已更新 440 条资讯 | 累计 31268 条内容
关于我们

AI 资讯

AI人工智能最新资讯、模型发布、研究进展

16561
篇文章

共 16561 篇 · 第 816/829 页

Product Hunt

folk

the AI in your texts that gets stuff done Discussion | Link

2026-05-26 05:24 👁 5 查看原文 →
Product Hunt

SellerClaw

A team of AI agents that runs your stores across channels Discussion | Link

Artem Kosilov 2026-05-26 05:03 👁 3 查看原文 →
Reddit r/MachineLearning

The famous METR AI time horizons graph contains numerous severe errors [D]

Nathan Witkin, a research writer at NYU Stern’s Tech and Society Lab, writes damningly about the famous METR AI time horizons graph in the Substack publication Transformer: It is impossible to draw meaningful conclusions from METR’s Long Tasks benchmark — in particular once one realizes that its numerous flaws are probably compounding in unpredictable ways. The appropriate response to a study of this kind is not to assume it can be saved via back-of-the-envelope adjustments, or to comfort oneself that other anecdotal evidence implies that it is probably correct anyway. It is to cut one’s losses and move on in search of higher-quality information. … The METR graph cannot be saved. For all its sleekness and complexity, it contains far too many compounding errors to excuse. Among them is generalizing to the entire species data collected from a small group of the authors’ peers. Coming up with ever more dramatic ways to make this mistake has become a kind of sport among AI researchers. If the field has a central pathology, it is to aggressively overindex on a mix of anecdotal data from power-users, alongside a long list of benchmarks even more compromised than METR’s. One hopes that as the field matures, its participants will learn to stop making these mistakes. The errors include: Some of the human baselines data is not actually measured or collected from any empirical source, rather, it is just guesstimated by the authors A key variable in the data is how long it takes humans to complete certain tasks, but — when METR did actually measure this — it paid its human benchmarkers hourly, meaning they were incentivized with cash to take longer The sample of human benchmarkers was biased toward METR employees’ friends, acquaintances, and former colleagues (who are likely unrepresentative and possibly biased) Humans familiar with a codebase and a specific coding task were 5-18x faster at completing it, but METR used data from humans who were much slower because they had to s

/u/common_yarrow 2026-05-26 02:30 👁 5 查看原文 →
Reddit r/MachineLearning

DCGAN inference on a microcontroller: 12.6M parameters, 512KB SRAM, 26-second generation, pure C [P]

Just thought I'd share, I ran a DCGAN on a dual core RISC-V microcontroller, the CH32H417 generating 64x64 cat faces. This is a new RISC-V MCU, so no TFLite, no CMSIS NN and no external memory. It's a pure C inference engine, bit-identical to PyTorch reference outputs. The model is 12.6M parameters with int8 per channel quantization. Intermediate activations are stored in DTCM and layer weights stream from SD card using double buffering so the next layer loads while the current one computes. The total available SRAM is 512KB shared between both cores and the inference engine and time to generate one image is 26 seconds, it could be faster, but SD card access speed is the bottleneck rather than computation. The z vector is seeded from 200 bytes of quantum random data (ANU QRNG vacuum fluctuation source), transformed via Box-Muller into the latent vector. which is not strictly necessary for image quality but it was a fun constraint for the art installation side of the project. The generated cat is classified as "motivated" or "demotivated" based on a single quantum bit, which selects from a phrase bank with four fragment slots combining into one of 131,072 possible spoken verdicts output through the onboard DAC... As far as I can tell nobody else is running GAN inference on these low cost RISC-V microcontrollers, cause ARM has the CMSIS NN ecosystem for this kind of thing but RISC-V MCUs especially in the CH32 space have nothing, so the entire inference engine is written from scratch. Paper: TinyGAN: Generative Image Synthesis on a RISC-V Microcontroller with Quantum Entropy Sampling submitted by /u/Separate-Choice [link] [留言]

/u/Separate-Choice 2026-05-26 02:22 👁 5 查看原文 →
InfoQ

Microsoft Introduces MDASH for Large-Scale AI Vulnerability Research

Microsoft has introduced a new AI-driven vulnerability discovery system called MDASH, a multi-model agentic security platform designed to automate large-scale code auditing across Windows and other Microsoft software environments. The system combines more than 100 specialized AI agents that work together to scan, validate, debate, and prove vulnerabilities across complex codebases. By Robert Krzaczyński

Robert Krzaczyński 2026-05-26 00:30 👁 11 查看原文 →
Reddit r/MachineLearning

Call for Papers - Workshop on Efficient Reasoning at COLM 2026 [R]

🌟 Announcing the 2nd Workshop on Efficient Reasoning (ER) at @colm2026 — Oct 9! 📣 We welcome submissions! Submit your work here: https://openreview.net/group?id=colmweb.org/COLM/2026/Workshop/Efficient_Reasoning 🗓️ Deadline: July 12, 2026 (AoE) 🔗 Website: https://wdlctc.github.io/efficient-reasoning-2026/ 💬 Topics include (but aren't limited to): 🔹 Multimodal, spatial & embodied reasoning under efficiency constraints 🔹 Curating high-quality reasoning datasets under resource constraints 🔹 Algorithmic innovations for efficient training & RL fine-tuning 🔹 Fast inference: pruning, compression, progressive generation, KV-cache tricks 🔹 Benchmarks & theory on time-/space-complexity and faithfulness 🔹 Systems to deploy long-CoT or on-device reasoning in the wild 🔹 Safety & robustness of efficient reasoning pipelines 🔹 Real-time applications in healthcare, robotics, autonomy, and more 🤝 We invite perspectives from ML, systems, natural & social sciences, and industry practitioners to rethink reasoning under tight compute, memory, latency, and cost budgets. Hope to see you there! 🚀 submitted by /u/Mediocre-Ad5059 [link] [留言]

/u/Mediocre-Ad5059 2026-05-25 23:25 👁 5 查看原文 →
Krebs on Security

Netherlands Seizes 800 Servers, Arrests 2 for Aiding Cyberattacks

Authorities in the Netherlands have arrested the co-owners of two related Internet hosting companies for operating IT infrastructure used by Russia to carry out cyberattacks, influence operations and disinformation campaigns inside the European Union. The two men were the focus of a 2025 KrebsOnSecurity story about how their hosting companies had assumed control over the technical infrastructure of Stark Industries Solutions, an Internet service provider sanctioned last year by the EU as a frequent staging ground for cyber mischief from Russia's intelligence agencies.

BrianKrebs 2026-05-25 21:21 👁 10 查看原文 →
Reddit r/MachineLearning

Are ICML workshops worth attending? [D]

Hi! I missed securing a main conference ticket for ICML 2026, as my workshop paper got accepted two days ago. Do you believe that it is worth attending just workshops at such A*-tier conferences (with all the overseas travel costs etc.)? I was quite looking forward to attending both, including the talks, poster sessions and company booths. I come from an adjacent field and have therefore had quite a few conference experiences. Any insights into past experience are highly welcome. Thank you! submitted by /u/dreameroutloud [link] [留言]

/u/dreameroutloud 2026-05-25 21:14 👁 5 查看原文 →
InfoQ

Presentation: From Legacy to Sovereignty: Driving the Future of Insurance through Platform Engineering

Sergiu Petean discusses the strategic journey of evolving DevOps into platform engineering within heavily regulated enterprise environments. He explains how to maximize efficiency using dynamic reference architectures, align platform KPIs directly with board-level business goals, reduce cognitive load via custom team topologies, and maintain innovation sovereignty through open-source technology. By Sergiu Petean

Sergiu Petean 2026-05-25 19:35 👁 8 查看原文 →