AI 资讯

NCTA seeks waiver from foreign-router ban, citing memory and substrate shortages.

Bittensor pays roughly eight dollars in TAO token emissions for every dollar of real AI revenue that flows through the network. The exact ratio fluctuates by quarter, but the shape is durable. Q1 2026: about $328 million in annual emissions against $43 million in real AI revenue. That is 7.6 to 1. It is what the crypto-skeptical press has called "extractive by default." It is also what the crypto-friendly analysts call "the subsidy treadmill." The Bittensor engineering team is sophisticated. The subnet validators run real ML evaluation. The miners serve real inference. The revenue is real. The emissions are also real. The cause is the token model itself. One asset is asked to do two jobs that do not belong together. I want to be specific about this part, because every other decentralized AI compute network I have looked at has the same problem, and the fix is well-known. What the token does A token in a decentralized AI compute network does two structurally distinct things. The first job is utility settlement . Contributors run inference, and someone has to pay them for the compute work they did. The payment medium has to scale with usage, has to be denominated in something the contributor can spend on the network or convert to fiat, and has to remain stable enough that contributors can plan around it. This is a billing system. The second job is value capture . Early supporters, investors, and contributors take risk to bootstrap a network that does not yet exist. They have to be paid back for that risk in a way that scales with the eventual success of the network. The payment medium has to be a speculative asset that appreciates as the network grows. This is an equity instrument. A billing system and an equity instrument want opposite things. A billing system that is also a speculative asset means that contributors who get paid in it cannot help but hold a speculative position. An equity instrument that is also a billing system means that token-price volatility show

Google now lets big creators and publishers in the US claim dedicated profiles in Search to highlight things like videos, articles, and their other profiles online. But this feature won't be available to most people or organizations; Google is limiting it to people with at least 100,000 YouTube subscribers, 100,000 followers on Instagram or X, […]

Enlace a post en Español Click If you are developing games in Godot and using AI to help you code, you are probably tired of constantly switching tabs between your editor and the browser. Copying code, pasting it, explaining your scene context over and over again... it is a massive workflow killer. To solve this, I built Golem-AI (named after the Godot Engine logo because let's face it, it looks like a tiny, friendly mechanical golem). It is a "Cursor-style" AI assistant extension integrated directly into a dock right inside your Godot 4.2+ editor. Today, I am opening the repository to the community as a completely open-source project. It is currently in Beta and has some bugs, but it is fully functional, and I want to share it so we can improve it together. / ____/___ / /__ ____ ___ / | / _/ / / __/ __ \/ / _ \/ __ `__ \______/ /| | / / / /_/ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / /_____/ ___ |_/ / \____/\____/_/\___/_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ |_/___/ 🎮 How it Looks Inside the Editor Here is a glimpse of the integrated dock interface, its session history, and the context autocomplete system in action: 🔥 Key Features 🦙 Local & Cloud Providers: Connect it to Ollama or LM Studio for a 100% free, offline local workflow, or hook it up to OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, or Cursor proxies. 🧠 Cursor-Style UX & Context (@ Mentions): Type @ in the chat composer to automatically attach open scenes, specific project files, or custom skills directly into the prompt. 🛠️ Editor Tool Calling: It features an optional multi-step verification loop. The AI can actually interact with native Godot editor tools to help you iterate and fix things faster. 📚 Markdown Skills System: Feed the assistant specific workflows, style guides, or documentation using standard markdown files (/skill or @skill :id). 💬 Advanced Chat UI: Built-in "thinking blocks", agent step progress tracking, searchable history sessions, and a native bilingual UI (English / Spanish). 🛠️ The Current State: "It works, but..." (Looking for Beta Testers!) L

If you've ever worked on an e-commerce project in Chile, sooner or later you bump into Transbank. There's no avoiding it. I built a reference template that use NestJS on the backend and Next.js 16 on the frontend, and in this post I want to walk you through the whole thing: what Webpay Plus actually is, why the integration looks the way it does, and how each piece fits together. Github Repository Reference: Link A bit of context Webpay Plus is one of the most important online payment methods in Chile. The user experience is straightforward: your customer enters an amount on your site, gets redirected to Transbank's branded payment page, fills in their card details there, and comes back to your site with a result. From a UX perspective it's not as slick as Stripe Elements or a fully embedded checkout — the user always sees Transbank's domain in the address bar during the payment — but from a developer's perspective that's actually a feature. You never touch card numbers. PCI scope stays minimal. Transbank handles 3D Secure, fraud rules, and bank routing. The trade-off is that the integration model is what you might politely call classical . It's built around full-page redirects and form POSTs, not modern APIs with JSON responses and webhooks. That's important to understand up front, because it shapes every decision you'll make in the code. The integration flow, step by step Before looking at any code, it helps to have a clear mental model of what's happening . There are three distinct moments where your system talks to Transbank's system, and each one has a specific shape. First Step: When the customer clicks "Pay", the backend asks Transbank to create a transaction (amount, order ID, return URL) . Transbank returns a transaction token and a redirect URL where you must send the user. Second Step: Transbank requires the redirect to be an HTTP POST with the token in a token_ws form field, so you must generate an HTML form with a hidden token_ws input and submit it prog

Excited to share SkillMap AI, a platform designed to help organizations make faster and more accurate staffing decisions. The idea is simple: project requirements and candidate profiles often live in separate documents, making team allocation slow and inconsistent. SkillMap AI bridges that gap by converting project requirements into structured skill demand and matching them against candidate capabilities. ✨ Key Features • Requirement Intelligence – Transform project briefs into normalized skill requirements • Candidate Matching – Compare resumes against actual project needs, not just keywords • Skill Gap Analysis – Identify missing capabilities before project execution • Staffing Decision Support – Recommend validation, interviews, and upskilling paths 📊 Outcomes ✓ Faster staffing shortlists ✓ Reduced manual resume screening ✓ Better project-team alignment ✓ Evidence-based skill gap identification ✓ Improved workforce planning 🌐 Live Demo: https://skill-map-ai-delta.vercel.app Would love to hear your thoughts and feedback!

Hello. I am a 9th grade student from India. AI was used only for grammar correction. These are my own questions. I am confused about two concepts: 1. Second Law of Thermodynamics: It states that the entropy of an isolated system increases. Decreasing entropy requires work. Does this imply that while time dilation from General Relativity can cause time to pass slower, time can never run backwards, as that would require a spontaneous decrease in entropy? 2. General Relativity: Time passes slower i

Hey all. Been vibe coding for almost 2 years now (I think?). Previously was more focused on traditional micro-saas but recently decided to go in a different direction and see how far I could push lovable and try and make a commercial grade browser based game. Built it with Lovable + Supabase + Stripe -- full commercial browser game, gyroscope controls on mobile, no app store needed. Generated all my assets (I know, I know, there aren't a ton) with a combination of Gemini to prototype and the GPT 2 to finalize. I've made a few small games here and there that generally only get used by my kiddos, but with this one I wanted to try and create a full gaming experience (login rewards, leaderboard, store, powerup mechanics, simulated ads, etc.) Put a $100 bounty on it for the first player to reach level 100 on mobile. Nobody has claimed it since launch. So genuinely asking -- is it too hard, or is that the point? tiltra.io P.S. It is currently playable on both desktop and mobile but with the gyro mechanic it is definitely more fun and challenging on mobile. submitted by /u/BeltwayBro [link] [留言]

Bytedance released Bernini for video editing. The architecture splits the pipeline into a semantic planner that understands intent, then a renderer that executes. The planner draws a semantic sketch before any pixels are committed. This is the exact structure I want from coding agents. A planning stage that understands the codebase, the constraints, the dependencies. Then an execution stage that respects that plan. Right now most coding agents skip the planning layer or treat it as advice the agent can ignore mid flight. Bernini gets around the ignore problem by making the plan structural. The semantic sketch is a contract. The renderer's job is to match it. Coding agents need the same contract: a structured task graph where each step has inputs, outputs, and exit conditions. The hardware angle is interesting too. Gemma 4 at 2GB vram means the planner can run locally while the renderer stays in the cloud. Local intent understanding plus remote execution. Latency drops. Privacy improves. I have been using verdent partly for this reason: the plan comes before execution. Coding agents should pay attention to how video generation solved the same problem. submitted by /u/SherbertDazzling3661 [link] [留言]

Hi guys. I have been working on Hitoku Draft, an open-source, voice-first AI assistant that runs entirely locally. I posted about it already, and now it has also transcription with voice editing. Looking for feedback, as I found that outside tech circles other people still do not use this tech much. It's context-aware, in the sense that it reads your screen, documents, and active app to understand what you're working on. You can ask about PDFs, reply to emails, create calendar events, use web se

Opus 4.6 or sonnet 4.6 for rping Currently running on pro right now Im unsure what to choose between the two in terms of rping cause i prefer creative writing, stay in character, deep emotional prose, good character development, good memory, good character emotionals and stuff like that So far im using opus 4.6 but it drains the limits relatively quick For the sonnet i can use for hours and still be fine So like im wondering which is better for rping? I havent tested both deeply Also if they're an even better option, pls tell me. submitted by /u/Turbulent_Arrival_55 [link] [留言]

Gartner updated their 2026 forecast to $2.5 trillion in global AI spending. Same week, MIT's NANDA Initiative dropped a follow-up: 95% of enterprise gen AI projects deliver zero measurable return. Not low return. Zero. I've been on the delivery side of 14 of these projects since January. The MIT number doesn't surprise me. If anything it's generous. 1. 73% of the engineering work that gets AI into production has nothing to do with the model. Data pipelines, integration layers, legacy system remediation, human-in-the-loop tooling. That's where the hours go. The model is 27% of the work but gets 70%+ of the budget. Every time. 2. The budget ratio between projects that ship and projects that stall is almost exactly inverted. We tracked this through ticket history and commit logs across 14 engagements. Projects that made it to production: roughly 30% model, 70% infrastructure. Projects that stalled: 70% model, 30% infrastructure. Most companies think they're at 50/50. They're not even close. 3. One client went from 71% Copilot adoption to 34% in six months. Two other AI platform licenses dropped under 12%. Combined licensing: $340K/year. The tools worked fine. Nobody redesigned workflows to actually use them. 4. The median data error rate across our engagements is 14%. Teams always guess 5-10%. One client found 23% in month four of a $310K build. That's two months of an ML engineer building training pipelines against garbage data. $36K in salary discovering a problem a data audit would have caught in a week. 5. Medtech company. Four concurrent AI pilots. No kill criteria. $920K in engineer salary. Eleven months. Shipped: nothing. I've now seen this at six companies now. Nobody defines when to stop spending. So nobody stops. 6. Individual gains are real. Company-level ROI stays flat. HCLTech and Writer both found this from different angles. Only 29% of companies see significant ROI from gen AI, despite people at their desks reporting productivity jumps as high as 5x. I m

Meta's Creator Assistant AI can analyze your past posts to help with future content plans.

I have been researching how startups and developers manage AI spending across OpenAI, Claude, Gemini and other models. Many people seem to rely on spreadsheets, rough estimates or provider dashboards. I'm curious: How are you tracking AI costs today? What is the biggest frustration in your workflow? Trying to understand the problem space better before building additional features. submitted by /u/OneDisastrous7969 [link] [留言]

Jo is a secure programming language that intends to addressing the fine-grained sandboxing problem at compile-time. To make secure programming practical it ends up with a two-world architecture : - confined world : not trusted, no FFI transitively, disciplined, standard library is not trusted - trusted world : trusted, FFI, type cast, language runtime is trusted The two-world architecture makes it possible to establish a security wall inside the language : that makes it easy to confine an untrusted program to arbitrarily fine-grained permission, e.g., only access certain rows or columns of a database table. The language-level confinement remove the need for runtime sandboxing because compile-time confinement is more fine-grained. It also makes security auditing easier. For resource quota, it still needs to be combined with ulimit/cgroups. We believe the two-world design addresses both the need for security and usability in secure programming. Comments are welcome on the design or alternatives to address the same problem. Link: https://jo-lang.org/security/two-worlds.html submitted by /u/liufengyun [link] [留言]

I’m trying to set up SSL for a newly added domain on a shared cPanel hosting account. The domain is already added inside cPanel and shows under the SSL/TLS section, but the certificate status says the installed certificate does not cover the new domain. The existing certificate appears to be old/expired and was not issued by AutoSSL. When I go to the SSL/TLS Wizard, it says: “There are no SSL/TLS products available at this time. SSL/TLS providers can be enabled by the server administrator.” I’m not seeing a clear “Run AutoSSL” button anywhere in cPanel. Is this something I can fix myself from cPanel, or does the hosting provider need to enable AutoSSL / SSL providers on the server side? I’m mainly trying to get SSL working for the main domain and www version of the domain. submitted by /u/PersonalityLife6196 [link] [留言]

As an ML researcher, how do you use AI tools in your daily work? Do you mostly use them to clean up grammar and wording, or also to rewrite, structure, or draft technical text? submitted by /u/Hope999991 [link] [留言]

Amazon's gaming strategy has never really been clear. It's been very active in the space: acquiring Twitch, launching its Luna cloud gaming service nearly six years ago, investing heavily in MMOs during the peak of live-service wave, and having access to a huge slate of franchises through Prime Video and the MGM Studios library. Late […]

TL;DR: Reliability techniques (methods that boost an LLM's correctness by spending extra inference, e.g., retries with feedback, ensembling, generator/critic refinement, verification passes, difficulty-aware routing) are scattered across the literature, each in its own paper-specific codebase. We unified 28 reliability techniques ( 21 communication-theoretic methods across 6 families plus 7 prior-method baselines : Self-Consistency, Self-Refine, CoVe, BoN, Weighted BoN, CISC, MoA), each measured against an uncoded single-pass baseline, under a single API, with 3 adaptive routers (SemKNN + two local ACM routers) sitting on top, then showed that routing the technique adaptively per prompt lets you slide along a quality/cost frontier. In our paper benchmark with one specific lineup, Nemotron + Devstral as the two generators and GLM-5.1 as the judge, the adaptive router delivered ~56% cost reduction at matched quality, or ~7% quality bump at matched cost, vs the best fixed method we compared against at that same lineup. One knob ( λ ) does the sliding. The qualitative pattern (adaptive beats fixed) should generalize, but absolute numbers are lineup-specific, and we haven't run the full sweep across other model combinations yet. Adoption is change one import : python - from openai import OpenAI + from agentcodec.openai import OpenAI Pass reliability="harq_ir" (or any of the 28 techniques) and existing client.chat.completions.create(...) calls keep their native OpenAI response shape. Same drop-in shims for Anthropic and Ollama. GitHub: https://github.com/intellerce/agentcodec Working paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09121 After spending a while researching reliability methods from papers, we kept hitting the same wall: every paper ships its own one-off codebase with its own prompt format, its own scoring rubric, its own model wrapper. Benchmarking "should we use self-refine or best-of-N here?" turned into a week of plumbing per comparison. The communication-theory framin