AI 资讯

I'm really interested in trying to learn about this new concept of having a one central AI-powered database acting as a digital brain for your business, pulling in all of the various data sources and having one single source of truth. People like Nate B Jones talk about it and I really want to try to build something - but concious how wrong they can go. Are there any credible ones already build I can base off? Has anyone done this? submitted by /u/zascar [link] [留言]

Every tool sprawl thread I read starts with license math, and license math is a decoy. Last quarter I added up what our seven-tool delivery stack actually cost us, and the subscriptions came to about 15% of the total. The other 85% never appears on an invoice, which is exactly why nobody budgets for it and nobody fixes it. Some background so you can judge whether my numbers transfer to your team. I spent years building automation in banking before running my own product team, so I am professionally allergic to process waste. Despite that, our stack had drifted into the usual shape: Jira for tickets, Confluence for docs, Lucidchart for architecture, TestRail for test cases, two spreadsheets doing unpaid overtime in the gaps, and an AI chatbot bolted on the side that had never seen any of it. The licenses for all of that, for six people, ran about $700 a month. Annoying. Not a crisis. And that is precisely why the "consolidate your tools" pitch dies in so many budget conversations. Saving a few hundred dollars a month does not justify a migration, and everyone in the room knows it. If licenses were the real cost, I would side with the skeptics. The audit: two weeks of logging every re-key So we measured the part nobody measures. For two weeks, everyone on the team logged every re-key: any moment a human moved or restated information that already existed in another tool. Copying acceptance criteria from Confluence into a Jira ticket. Updating TestRail because a story changed shape. Redrawing a Lucidchart flow that had drifted from the code. Reassembling a status update by hand from three tabs. Pasting project context into the chatbot, again, because it forgot everything since yesterday. The rules were strict so the number would survive scrutiny. Log transfer time only, not thinking time. Round down when unsure. If the same fact got re-keyed twice, log it twice, because it cost twice. Each entry went into a shared CSV with four columns, and this script turned it into th

Playwright has excellent tooling around browser automation, but most of the ecosystem still treats it as a test framework. For teams running AI coding agents and automated browser workflows, there is a different set of requirements: browser automation ↓ session persistence across runs ↓ debuggable traces when things go wrong ↓ parallel execution across CI shards The Playwright CLI directly addresses these gaps. It ships as a standalone npm package and exposes every browser operation as a CLI command; open, click, type, snapshot - without requiring a Node.js script or test runner. npm package: @playwright/cli GitHub: https://github.com/microsoft/playwright-cli The current implementation focuses on: session persistence with named instances and portable state video and trace recording built into every session CI sharding for parallel execution at scale session persistence The default behaviour keeps browser state in memory. Cookies and localStorage are preserved between CLI calls within the session, but cleared when the browser closes. For repeatable workflows, that breaks down fast — logging into an application before every run wastes time and introduces flakiness. Named sessions let you run multiple browser instances simultaneously and address them by name: playwright-cli -s=admin open https://app.example.com/admin playwright-cli -s=checkout open https://app.example.com/checkout Each session is an isolated browser instance. An agent can orchestrate workflows across multiple authenticated contexts without state leaking between them. The goal is straightforward: the same CLI binary should be able to maintain independent browser contexts for parallel workflows without requiring environment-specific configuration. The critical piece for CI and agent reuse is state persistence: log in once playwright-cli -s=admin open https://app.example.com/login playwright-cli -s=admin fill "#username" "admin" playwright-cli -s=admin fill "#password" "$ADMIN_PASS" playwright-cli -s=admi

Kubernetes vs Docker, PaaS, and Traditional Deployment Tools for AI Apps: What Developers Need in 2026 Hadil Ben Abdallah Hadil Ben Abdallah Hadil Ben Abdallah Follow Jun 9 Kubernetes vs Docker, PaaS, and Traditional Deployment Tools for AI Apps: What Developers Need in 2026 # ai # kubernetes # docker # devops 35 reactions 6 comments 8 min read

PostgreSQL Partitioning for Multi-Tenant Audit Logs: Querying 100M Events Without Table Scans I'll be direct: if you're running a SaaS with compliance requirements and your audit_logs table is approaching 50M rows, you're three months away from pain. I've watched audit queries go from 200ms to 8 seconds in production at 2am because someone ran a "give me all logs for tenant X" report. Partitioning isn't optimization theater—it's table-stakes infrastructure. At CitizenApp, we store 9 months of audit logs across 50+ tenants. Without partitioning, a single compliance query would full-table scan 100M+ rows. With it, we hit the same data in <100ms. This post is exactly how we do it. Why Partitioning Matters (The Reality Check) Most developers treat audit_logs like any other table. You add an index on tenant_id and created_at , call it done, and move on. Then your compliance officer runs a query like: SELECT * FROM audit_logs WHERE tenant_id = 'acme-corp' AND created_at >= '2024-01-01' ORDER BY created_at DESC ; At 50M rows, even with a composite index, PostgreSQL has to: Index scan → finds millions of matching rows Random I/O all over the table Spill to disk if sorting is large Hope the OS cache is warm Partitioning solves this by eliminating the data you don't need from day one . Instead of scanning a 100GB table and filtering it down, PostgreSQL can skip entire partitions. A query against January 2024 data simply ignores partitions for February–December. I prefer partitioning because it's native PostgreSQL—no external caching layer, no read replicas, no Redis gymnastics. It's boring infrastructure that works. The Partitioning Strategy: Composite Partitioning (Range + List) I use a two-level partitioning scheme: Range partition by month ( created_at ) — keeps each partition to ~5–10GB List subpartition by tenant — ensures compliance queries are single-partition scans This is deliberately opinionated. You could do range-only, but then a multi-tenant query still scans the

I’ll say it plainly: the first health-adjacent agent workflow I’d trust is not an AI doctor. It’s a narrow pipeline that takes 6 months of Apple Watch sleep data, cleans timestamps, maps records into a fixed sleep-diary schema, flags broken rows, and stops for human review before anything reaches a clinician. That sounds unsexy. Good. That’s exactly why it’s the first version I’d trust. I landed on this after reading a post on r/openclaw where someone said they had their AI assistant turn months of Apple Watch sleep data into the diary their sleep clinic requested, and the data gotchas were brutal. That sentence contains the whole product. Not “AI healthcare.” Not “autonomous wellness.” Not a GPT-5 wrapper with a soothing UI pretending it understands sleep medicine. Just a very practical engineering problem: parse ugly export data normalize time boundaries fit it into a clinician-friendly format fail loudly on bad rows require a human to approve it That is a real use case. And if you build automations in n8n, Make, Zapier, OpenClaw, or Python, it should feel familiar: the hard part is not the final prompt. The hard part is the ugly middle. The hard part is ETL, not reasoning Most health-agent demos skip the only part that matters. They show the polished summary. They show Claude or GPT-5 saying something calm and articulate. They show a dashboard. I don’t think that’s the hard part. The hard part is ETL: extraction transformation loading For sleep data, that means dealing with stuff like: timestamps crossing midnight timezone normalization naps vs overnight sleep missing start or end times overlapping intervals gaps from the device not recording clinic-specific diary formats If you get any of that wrong, the model summary at the end is not helpful. It is actively misleading. That’s why I think the boring pipeline is the real product. The workflow I’d actually ship If I had to build this today, I would keep the architecture aggressively narrow. Apple Health export ->

My CV is a PDF, and PDFs do not answer questions. So I built ask.hiten.dev : a streaming chat grounded in my actual career history, where a recruiter can ask "why should I hire you over another senior frontend engineer?" and get a real answer. The constraint that made it interesting: the total inference budget is zero. No OpenAI bill, no hosted vector DB, nothing. Here is what that actually took. Four free providers and a failover chain No single free tier is reliable enough to put in front of strangers. Groq's free tier caps at 100k tokens/day, and I hit that cap on day one. OpenRouter's free models come and go. Cerebras occasionally queues you out at busy times. The fix is boring and effective: an ordered provider chain, all OpenAI-compatible, walked per-request until one answers. Groq (llama-3.3-70b) -> OpenRouter (gpt-oss-120b:free) -> NVIDIA (llama-3.3-70b) -> Cerebras (gpt-oss-120b) Each provider is just a base URL, a key and a model name. The API route tries each in order; the first 2xx with a body wins, and the response streams straight through. The client gets an X-Provider header so I can see who served what in the logs. Two details that mattered: Empty env vars are not unset. Docker Compose's ${VAR:-} yields an empty string, which defeats ?? defaults in Node. Every key goes through a helper that coerces "" to undefined , otherwise a provider with no key "exists" and fails every request. You cannot cheaply probe a token-per-day cap. My health check hits GET /models on each provider (auth check, 60s cache). It tells you "key works, service up", not "you have tokens left". The failover chain covers the gap: a TPD-capped provider fails fast and the next one picks up. If every provider is down, the page itself says so. The health check runs server-side at render time, and instead of a broken chat you get a short maintenance note. Never ship a chat UI that can fail after the user has typed. Open-weight models do not follow formatting orders My site's voice avoi

The Problem with Most Online Formatters You know the drill. You paste some JSON into a random online formatter, or convert a CSV to Markdown, or format a WeChat article. The tool works fine, but have you ever stopped to think about what happens to your data? Most "free" online tools send your content to their servers. Some store it. Some log it. Some sell aggregated data. You have no idea where your sensitive JSON payload, proprietary CSV data, or internal documentation ends up. The Client-Side Alternative I built tools.pixiaoli.cn — a collection of 33+ developer utilities that run entirely in your browser . No server uploads. No data collection. Your content never leaves your machine. What's Inside Here's a taste of what's available: JSON Formatter & Validator — Format, minify, validate, and tree-view JSON instantly CSV Converter — Convert between CSV, JSON, and Markdown tables WeChat Markdown Editor — Write Markdown and preview it exactly as it appears in WeChat articles Base64 Encoder/Decoder — With file upload support URL Encoder/Decoder — For query parameters and path segments Hash Generator — MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-512 Color Converter — Between HEX, RGB, HSL, and named colors Regex Tester — Live pattern matching with highlighted results Diff Viewer — Side-by-side text comparison Code Formatter — JavaScript, CSS, HTML, SQL, and more UUID Generator — v4 UUIDs for APIs and databases QR Code Generator — Customizable with logo support Markdown Preview — Live split-pane editor Image Format Converter — PNG, WebP, JPEG, GIF, BMP, AVIF Text Case Converter — camelCase, snake_case, kebab-case, and more Lorem Ipsum Generator — Customizable paragraph count and word limits HTML Minifier — Remove whitespace and comments CSS Minifier — Compress stylesheets JavaScript Minifier — Obfuscate and compress JS XML Formatter — Pretty-print XML documents YAML Formatter — Validate and format YAML HTML to Markdown — Convert rich HTML to clean Markdown Markdown to HTML — Render Markdow

link - https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06158 Abstract : Adaptive video tokenisation seeks to dynamically allocate token budgets based on the underlying visual complexity of a sequence. Current continuous-regime approaches achieve this via iterative binarised searches or trained neural regressors, while discrete methods often require a full-rate decoder pass to estimate information content. We demonstrate that such computational overheads are not strictly necessary. We show that the latent space of a frozen continuous video tokeniser inherently encodes temporal redundancy that can be exploited directly: spatial positions whose latent representations change minimally between consecutive frames carry near-zero additional information. We introduce a parameter-free adaptive token allocation mechanism that applies a fixed threshold to per-position temporal-L1 differences, identifying and dropping redundant latent positions. Consequently, the compression rate emerges naturally from the input content rather than being enforced top-down: static scenes get compressed aggressively, while highly dynamic sequences retain more tokens. To reconstruct the dropped positions, we propose the Latent Inpainting Transformer (LIT), a lightweight factorised spatial-temporal attention architecture. The resulting inference pipeline is highly efficient, requiring only a single encoder pass and one LIT forward pass, eliminating the need for auxiliary routing networks. Evaluations across TokenBench and DAVIS, which are the standard benchmarks used by recent tokenisers, indicate that our framework yields meaningful, content-driven token allocation while maintaining competitive reconstruction fidelity, and delivers a 31x inference-time speedup over the continuous adaptive baseline (ElasticTok-CV) and an 2x speedup over the discrete information-theoretic baseline (InfoTok) submitted by /u/chhaya_35 [link] [留言]

Elon Musk is set to make hundreds of billions even as communities in Mississippi and Tennessee are fighting to stop the gas turbines powering xAI's supercomputers.

OpenAI's GPT-5.5, GPT-5.4, and Codex are now generally available on Amazon Bedrock, one month after OpenAI revised its exclusive Azure arrangement. Pricing matches OpenAI's direct rates with usage counting toward AWS commitments. Codex shifts to pay-per-token billing with no seat fees. GPT-5.4 is the first OpenAI model available in AWS GovCloud. By Steef-Jan Wiggers

Cindy Zhang discusses the evolution of XDS, a unified UI system powering 10,000+ internal tools. She shares actionable insights for architects and engineering leaders on managing large-scale community contributions, executing safe monorepo refactors using JS AST and AI codemods, mitigating breaking changes via feature flags, and expanding UI libraries into full-stack platform systems. By Cindy Zhang

Customers have complained that a telehealth network selling compounded GLP-1s has been ripping them off—even after it had to pay $5 million to clients as part of a settlement with the US government.

European economy airline Ryanair is under investigation in the UK for charging parents mandatory fees to sit with their children. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it was looking into whether the seating fees, which may be charging parents for the airline to meet its child safety and disability‑related obligations, are "unfair" under consumer […]

From Wired: “We’re changing Fable 5’s safeguards for frontier LLM development to make them visible.” Anthropic said in a statement to WIRED. “We made the wrong tradeoff and we apologize for not getting the balance right.” Anthropic now says it’s changing course, and that Claude Fable 5’s safeguards for AI development will be visible to users. If the company suspects a user is trying to use Claude to build a highly capable AI it will alert them that it’s either refusing the request, or rerouting the user to a less capable model. Full article: https://www.wired.com/story/anthropic-responds-to-backlash-on-claudes-secret-sabotage-on-ai-research/ submitted by /u/goldcakes [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/germandiago [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/techie_e [link] [留言]

Deezer will now scan your playlists on other streaming platforms to detect AI-generated music. Deezer was the first of the big streaming services to start labeling AI-generated music. It even offered its tech to other platforms, but it doesn't seem like it had many buyers. Qobuz launched its own detection tech, while Apple and Spotify […]