The car manufacturer is planning a big push into electric vehicles.

Universal XY Converter est un plugin QGIS pratique qui simplifie la conversion, la manipulation et le traitement rapide de coordonnées géographiques et projetées directement au sein de votre environnement de travail. 🎥 Tutoriel vidéo Découvrez la prise en main pas à pas en vidéo : 📖 Documentation complète Consultez le manuel d'utilisation officiel sur GitHub : 👉 User Manual - QGIS Plugin Universal XY Converter 🌟 Fonctionnalités clés Conversion rapide de coordonnées : Transformez facilement des paires de coordonnées (X, Y) entre différents systèmes de référence spatiales (CRS). Import & Traitement par lot : Prise en charge fluide de listes de points pour accélérer le traitement de vos relevés de terrain. Gain de temps au quotidien : Évite les manipulations manuelles complexes ou l'utilisation d'outils externes pour vérifier et convertir vos données de géolocalisation. 🚀 Comment les installer et démarrer ? Ouvrez QGIS . Allez dans le menu Extensions > Installer/Gérer les extensions . Dans la barre de recherche, tapez XY Converter (ou Universal Map2web ). Sélectionnez l'extension puis cliquez sur Installer l'extension . 💬 Vos retours m'intéressent ! Avez-vous testé ces outils ? N'hésitez pas à laisser un commentaire ci-dessous avec vos retours, vos questions ou vos idées d'amélioration !

You have read five blog posts about monads. Each one started with category theory, mentioned burritos, and left you more confused than before. Let's skip all of that. Here is the short version: a monad is a container that supports three operations. You already use two monads every day in TypeScript — Promise and Array . Once you see the pattern, every monad in @oofp/core will feel familiar. The Three Operations Every monad has three things: of(a) — Put a value into the container. map(f) — Transform the value inside, keep the container shape. chain(f) — Transform the value into a new container, then flatten. That's it. If a type supports these three operations and follows a few simple laws, it's a monad. Let's see this with types you already know. Promise — a monad you use daily // of — wrap a value const p = Promise . resolve ( 42 ); // map — transform the inside (then with a plain return) const doubled = p . then (( x ) => x * 2 ); // Promise<number> // chain — transform into a new Promise (then with an async return) const fetched = p . then (( id ) => fetch ( `/api/users/ ${ id } ` )); // Promise<Response> Promise.resolve is of . .then acts as both map and chain — JavaScript conflates them. When your callback returns a plain value, it's map . When it returns a Promise , it's chain . The runtime flattens the nested Promise<Promise<T>> into Promise<T> automatically. Array — another monad hiding in plain sight // of — wrap a value const arr = [ 42 ]; // map — transform each element const doubled = arr . map (( x ) => x * 2 ); // [84] // chain — transform each element into an array, then flatten const expanded = arr . flatMap (( x ) => [ x , x * 10 ]); // [42, 420] Array.of (or just [value] ) is of . .map is map . .flatMap is chain . Same pattern, different container. The insight is: chain is map followed by flatten . That's why it's also called flatMap or bind . You apply a function that returns a new container, then flatten the nested result. Maybe: Eliminating null

Response: https://substack.com/@maxspero/note/c-297953357

Charing your phone in the car may technically use energy, but not enough to give a second thought.

https://littletech.org/ https://static.politico.com/4a/bf/9c4021d8404386b0a311dcccf0...

submitted by /u/DataBaeBee [link] [留言]

If not, why not? That way, people can choose whether they want to install various software betas based on how much SSD wear they are willing to accept. And since this data would be made public and available in one place, software developers would be more careful about excessive logging in their betas.