HAWK withstood years of testing that had yet to uncover a fatal weakness found through Mythos.
Meta is all-in on AI, and sometime soon, the company is going to make a big push into personal AI agents that can do things on your behalf. On Wednesday's Q2 2026 earnings call, CEO Mark Zuckerberg previewed a high-level vision of how the company is thinking about personal agents and what it will do […]
In my previous article , I built a fully local RAG assistant Ollama, ChromaDB, LangChain, all running in Docker. It answered technical support questions by searching through documentation and citing sources. It worked. But after using it for a while, I noticed something uncomfortable: it treated every question the same way . Ask it "how to close monthly payroll?" it searches the docs. Fine. Ask it "the server crashes at startup" it also searches the docs. Less fine. Ask it something completely outside the documentation it searches the docs. Useless. A real support technician doesn't do that. They first assess the situation, then decide what to do: look it up, run a diagnosis, or escalate to a human. My RAG had no such judgment. That's what this article is about how I evolved the system into an Agentic AI architecture using LangGraph, where the assistant first decides which strategy to use , then acts accordingly. The Core Limitation of Classic RAG Classic RAG is a linear pipeline. Every query follows the exact same path: Question → Embed → Retrieve → Prompt → LLM → Answer No branching. No decision-making. No memory between steps. This works perfectly for procedural questions where the answer lives in the docs. But technical support involves at least three distinct scenarios: Scenario Example Best strategy Procedural question "How do I create an account?" Search documentation Known error code "ERR-COMP-001 appears" Lookup error database Unknown incident "Server crashes, no idea why" Diagnose + escalate if needed A single RAG pipeline handles the first case well and the other two poorly. The solution is to add a layer of reasoning before retrieval. What Agentic AI Adds The shift from RAG to Agentic AI comes down to one thing: the system plans before it acts . Instead of one fixed pipeline, you have: Question ↓ Classifier (what kind of question is this?) ↓ ├── Procedural → RAG Agent (search docs) ├── Error code → Diagnostic Agent (lookup + LLM analysis) └── Complex → D
RAMageddon won't be the only reason your next phone costs more - Qualcomm is about to raise prices on all its processors, as well. Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon said on Wednesday that "prices are going to go up" on the company's products starting on September 1st, CNBC reports. The price hikes were rumored last week […]
The program, ChatGPT for Academic Researchers, will start with 10,000 participants this summer.
Introduction When building a Flutter application, you'll often need to store data on the user's device. For example: Saving user preferences Storing login information Caching API responses Creating offline applications Building note-taking or to-do apps While there are several local storage solutions available, Hive is one of the fastest and easiest local storage for Flutter developers. In this tutorial, you'll learn Hive from scratch by building a simple example. No prior database knowledge is required. What is Hive? Hive is a lightweight, NoSQL database written entirely in Dart. It stores data directly on the device, making it perfect for Flutter applications. Why use Hive? Extremely fast Works offline No native platform code required Simple API Easy to learn Great for small and medium-sized applications Think of Hive as a collection of boxes where each box stores your application's data. Hive ├── User Box ├── Settings Box ├── Notes Box └── Products Box Each Box is similar to a table in traditional databases. Step 1: Create a Flutter Project Create a new Flutter project. flutter create hive_demo Open the project. cd hive_demo Step 2: Install Hive Open pubspec.yaml and add the following packages. dependencies : flutter : sdk : flutter hive : ^2.2.3 hive_flutter : ^1.1.0 Then install them. flutter pub get Step 3: Initialize Hive Before using Hive, initialize it inside main() . import 'package:flutter/material.dart' ; import 'package:hive_flutter/hive_flutter.dart' ; void main () async { WidgetsFlutterBinding . ensureInitialized (); await Hive . initFlutter (); await Hive . openBox ( 'settings' ); runApp ( const MyApp ()); } Here we open a box called settings . Step 4: Understanding Boxes A Box is where Hive stores data. Imagine this box: Settings Box theme -> dark username -> Alex loggedIn -> true Keys are on the left. Values are on the right. Step 5: Save Data Saving data is incredibly simple. var box = Hive . box ( 'settings' ); box . put ( 'username' , 'John' );
Everyone evaluating AI avatar platforms focuses on voice quality. The bigger UX killer is almost always latency — and it's a harder problem than picking a good TTS provider. Where the delay actually comes from: User speaks/types → STT (if voice input) → LLM generates response (streaming helps, but first-token latency matters) → TTS converts text to audio → Audio playback + lip-sync rendering Each hop adds latency. A naive implementation that waits for the full LLM response before starting TTS can easily hit 2-4 seconds of dead air — long enough for a user to assume the bot is broken. How production systems actually solve this: Token streaming into TTS — start synthesizing audio on partial LLM output (sentence-by-sentence chunks) instead of waiting for the full response Speculative rendering — start lip-sync animation slightly ahead of audio using predicted phoneme timing WebSocket/SSE persistent connections — avoid the overhead of repeated HTTP round-trips per turn Regional API routing — TTS/LLM provider latency varies a lot by user geography; this matters more than most benchmarks show A practical note: platforms that advertise "real-time" avatars but load all logic behind a single request/response cycle will feel noticeably worse than ones built around streaming pipelines, even if they use the identical LLM and TTS providers underneath. If you're evaluating a platform (or building one), test with realistic network conditions, not office wifi — that's where the architecture differences actually show up. Bottom line: the voice provider matters less than people think. The orchestration around it — how aggressively you stream and pipeline each stage — is what separates a "wow" demo from a production-ready conversational agent.
If this is too long, tldr : Google Conway’s Law wath yt video and think There is a popular rule in software development called Conway's Law. It says that organizations design systems that mirror the way people inside those organizations communicate. In simpler terms: Your architecture will eventually look like your team structure. Big company with separate frontend, backend, data, DevOps, and platform teams? You will probably end up with separate services, separate processes, separate ownership, and a lot of API calls between people who sit in different Slack channels. But what happens when the entire company is just two people? That is where things get interesting. At bundle.social, we are running a unified social media API that handles a lot of edge cases. And there are two of us. There is no dedicated platform team No analytics department No infrastructure group. No product manager translating customer feedback into Jira tickets. Just two people are trying to keep a fairly large system moving without turning it into a pile of slop services nobody fully understands. You would think Conway's Law does not really apply to such a small team. It absolutely does. It just shows up differently. How Conway’s Law Works in a 2-Person Team When you have 50 developers split across departments, Conway's Law creates microservices and cross-team dependency hell. When you have two developers, Conway's Law forces your system into one of two extremes: The "Two Halves of a Brain" Split: Service A belongs entirely to Person A, and Service B belongs entirely to Person B. Because human communication between two people has practically zero friction, it's extremely tempting to drift into the lazy version of Conway's Law: ignoring technical boundaries altogether because "we can just talk about it on Slack." Why write explicit API documentation when you sit next to the person who wrote the endpoint? Why enforce strict domain boundaries when you can just export a helper function across modul
Hey everyone, For the past few months I've been working on a side project called MeshDrop. The idea started because I wanted a simple way to send files and folders directly between my own devices (and with friends) without uploading everything to cloud storage or relying on third-party servers. MeshDrop is built on the Holepunch ecosystem using Pear Runtime, Bare JS, and Hyperswarm. It supports direct transfers over LAN and can also connect over the internet using DHT hole punching with end-to-end encryption. I've also been experimenting with a few extra features like short 8-character pairing codes, cross-device clipboard sharing, and a remote drive feature that's still a work in progress. I'm still learning as I build this project, and I've been using AI coding tools alongside documentation, testing, and a lot of trial and error to help me move faster. I'm trying to understand the code and improve with every feature instead of just generating code and hoping it works. This is very early beta, so please expect bugs, rough edges, missing features, and probably a few questionable UX decisions. I'm sharing it now because I'd rather get feedback early than spend months building something people don't actually enjoy using. If you decide to give it a try, I'd really love honest feedback on things like: Does the overall workflow feel simple or confusing? Is the UI easy to understand? Did you run into any bugs or connection issues? Are there features you'd expect from a P2P file sharing app that are missing? Is there anything that feels unnecessary or poorly designed? Please don't hold back. Constructive criticism is exactly what I'm looking for. If something feels wrong, confusing, or badly designed, I'd much rather hear about it now so I can improve it. GitHub: https://github.com/aamirali51/MeshDrop Latest Beta: https://github.com/aamirali51/MeshDrop/releases/tag/v1.0.0-beta.1 Thanks for taking the time to read this. Whether you try it, report a bug, suggest a feature, o
At TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, the AI Stage is back to dig into the single hottest topic in the community for the past few years, presented by Google for Startups.