标签：#war

At Disrupt 2026, Amazon's Panos Panay will provide an exclusive vision for what's in store for us beyond the smartphone.

Modern AI UX — chat panels, tool-calling agents, assistants that remember context and even suggest your next step — has lived in JavaScript SaaS for years. The Java enterprise stack has been left doing it the hard way. TabForge AI closes that gap . It's a complete platform for building AI-powered web apps on Jakarta EE + PrimeFaces — from the multi-tab UI shell down to a clean, provider-agnostic AI layer. Library, live demo, starter project, and a drop-in UI template — all shipped. Here's the whole thing, top to bottom. ## 1. Tabs as annotated beans — DynTabs You describe a tab; the framework handles opening, closing, lifecycle, and state. Each open tab gets its own isolated CDI bean via a custom @TabScoped scope. @Named @TabScoped @DynTab ( name = "OrdersDynTab" , uniqueIdentifier = "Orders" , title = "Orders" , includePage = "/WEB-INF/orders.xhtml" , trackActivity = true ) public class OrdersBean extends BaseDyntabCdiBean { // open the same tab twice → two independent instances } java No manual navigation, no page-state juggling. Open a tab, get a bean; close it, it's gone. A clean AI layer — EasyAI One fluent entry point over LangChain4j. Chat, tools, agents, and structured extraction — provider-agnostic, so the model behind it is a config detail. // A typed assistant with a business service exposed as tools OrdersAssistant ai = EasyAI . assistant ( OrdersAssistant . class ) . withTools ( orderService ) . build (); String reply = ai . ask ( "cancel order ORD-002" ); You opt methods in as tools explicitly — no accidental exposure: @EasyTool ( "Cancels an active order" ) public String cancelOrder ( String orderId ) { ... } Deterministic pipelines — flow() Agents are powerful but unpredictable. When you want a repeatable, testable process, flow() lets you own the steps and call the model only at the edges that actually need language: EasyAI . flow () . step ( "understand" , ctx -> EasyAI . extract ( OrderRequest . class ). from ( ctx . inputText ())) . step ( "check

Interesting empirical research: “ Black Box Warfare: Human Judgment and Military Decision-Making in the Age of AI .” Abstract: How is AI transforming decision-making in modern conflict? This study provides a unique empirical window into that question by deploying a high-fidelity replica of an AI decision-support system (DSS) used in military targeting. After reconstructing the interface and functionality of the real-world system, we tested its impact on combat decisions in two experiments involving 2,015 Israeli military personnel. Contrary to widespread fears of automation bias, we find strong evidence of algorithmic aversion, especially in scenarios involving high collateral damage. Yet we also show that integrating “explainable AI” features reduces algorithmic aversion and promotes more thoughtful evaluations of algorithmic recommendations. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions, revealing that trust in military AI is dynamic, varying with individual predispositions, perceived operational stakes, and the informational features of the interface. By grounding normative concerns in empirical evidence, our study offers critical insight into the integration of AI in warfare and underscores the enduring importance of human agency in high-stakes military decision-making...

The gaming industry has evolved from a niche entertainment sector into one of the fastest-growing technology-driven industries worldwide. India, with its large young population, growing digital economy, and increasing smartphone and internet penetration, is emerging as an important market for game development. As a result, students and technology enthusiasts are increasingly exploring a career in game development. Unlike traditional careers, game development brings together technology, creativity, storytelling, design, and problem-solving. From mobile games and PC titles to immersive AR/VR experiences, the industry offers diverse career paths for people with different skill sets. What Is Game Development? Game development is the process of designing, creating, testing, and launching video games. It involves several disciplines working together, including programming, game design, 2D/3D art, animation, sound design, storytelling, quality assurance, and project management. A game developer may work on everything from the underlying gameplay mechanics and physics to graphics, artificial intelligence, user interfaces, and multiplayer systems. Depending on their specialization, professionals can work with programming languages, game engines, animation software, or design tools. For aspiring professionals, understanding the different roles in the industry is the first step toward building a successful career in game development. Why Choose a Career in Game Development? Game development can be an exciting career option for individuals who enjoy technology and creative problem-solving. It allows professionals to turn ideas into interactive experiences while continuously learning new tools and technologies. Another advantage is the variety of career opportunities available. Someone interested in coding can become a gameplay programmer, while an artist can specialize in 3D modeling, character design, or animation. Others can explore game design, level design, sound, testing,

Spent the week redesigning my portfolio’s blog layout and nuking thousands of stale notes in my Obsidian vault. Between the UI polish and some deep dives into libp2p DHT de-flaking, I pushed 36 commits and managed to delete almost 16,000 lines of clutter. TL;DR I’ve always believed that your digital space needs a good pruning every now and then to stay healthy. This week was the embodiment of that philosophy. I pushed 36 commits across four primary projects, resulting in over 23,000 additions and nearly 16,000 deletions. Most of that churn came from a massive redesign of my portfolio's blog and a long-overdue "fresh start" for my Obsidian vault. On the open-source side, I spent some quality time in the weeds of py-libp2p , chasing down flaky DHT tests and proposing better subnet diversity limits. What I Built Portfolio Redesign: The Typography Pivot My main focus this week was my portfolio. I’ve been feeling like the blog layout was getting a bit cluttered, so I opened and merged PR #15, which was all about "typographic hierarchy instead of decoration." I’m moving away from unnecessary borders and boxes and letting the type do the heavy lifting. I spent a lot of time in components/blog and app/blog refining the layout. I implemented borderless filter pills and full-width rows to give the content more room to breathe. One of the bigger technical shifts was moving the blog list to be fully server-rendered. It feels snappier, and it allowed me to implement more "honest" dates and better hover states on the rows. I also added a real focus ring for accessibility (because we’ve all been frustrated by keyboard navigation that feels like a guessing game). By the time I was done, I’d touched over 200 files in that repo alone. The Obsidian Purge I also took a metaphorical chainsaw to my obsidian-vault . I nuked nearly 10,000 lines of stale content. I removed entire directories for "Projects," "Rust," and "Backend" notes that were just gathering digital dust. It’s easy to let

Introduction: The Debate Over Code Comments In the trenches of software development, a quiet but fierce debate rages: are code comments still relevant? On one side, the prevailing narrative dismisses comments as "mostly useless" —redundant, outdated, or worse, misleading. This perspective has gained traction, fueled by the rise of self-documenting practices like meaningful variable names and modular design. Developers, under the gun of tight deadlines, increasingly treat comments as an afterthought, if not a burden. The result? Comments are neglected, both in writing and reading, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy of their uselessness. But here’s the rub: this dismissive attitude is flawed. When used thoughtfully, comments are not just useful—they’re critical. The problem isn’t comments themselves but how they’re misused or ignored. Poorly written comments, lack of maintenance standards, and time constraints have deformed their purpose, turning a powerful tool into a liability. For example, a stale comment explaining a function’s behavior can lead a developer to misinterpret the code, causing bugs that cascade through the system. The mechanism here is clear: impact (misleading comment) -> internal process (developer misinterprets code) -> observable effect (bugs introduced) . The stakes are high. As software complexity grows and developer turnover accelerates, the need for clear, maintainable code becomes non-negotiable. Comments, when crafted with intent, act as a bridge between the code’s logic and the human mind, reducing cognitive load and fostering collaboration. Neglecting them risks eroding code readability, maintainability, and team productivity—a risk that materializes when a new developer inherits a poorly documented codebase and spends hours deciphering its intent. This investigation challenges the dismissive attitude toward comments, dissecting their underappreciated utility through real-world examples. By addressing misconceptions and promoting best pr

Craft externalizes nothing and transfers by apprenticeship. Engineering writes the governing relation down where someone else can find it wrong. Four times now I have written the same three sentences in different notations, for four problems that looked unrelated: a design method, a coding technology, an architecture-derivation procedure, and a contract-modelling tool. I noticed the repetition only after the fourth. Here it is, stated as precisely as I can manage. Structure is derived from the attribution of forced change. The attribution is kept as an explicit, checkable artifact. The derivation refuses rather than guesses when its inputs underdetermine the answer. Three clauses, each carrying weight. Drop one and look at what remains. Drop derived and you have a documentation exercise: the structure was chosen first and the attribution written to match. This is the normal case, and it makes no prediction, so nothing can disagree with it. Drop explicit artifact and you have taste. Real, valuable, and transferable only by apprenticeship. Drop refusal and you have a generator that answers every question. Its answers carry no information, because it was always going to produce one. The third clause has a lineage worth claiming Type inference has refused for fifty years. Hindley-Milner unification fails rather than picking a plausible substitution: when two types cannot be reconciled, the answer is an error, not a guess. Core HM needs no annotations at all -- it infers principal types, and that is the point. The interesting part is what happened when later extensions broke that guarantee. Type classes admit programs whose type is inferable while the instance to use is not; GADTs and polymorphic recursion break principality outright. In each case the compilers were free to pick a plausible candidate, and they demand an annotation instead. Build systems joined later: Bazel refuses an undeclared dependency rather than resolving it from ambient state ( this rule is missing

A few months ago I got properly bitten by the Linux bug. Ubuntu became my daily driver, I started digging into terminal tools way past the point of “practical necessity,” and I got obsessed with an idea that wouldn’t leave me alone: old hardware doesn’t have to die just because it’s old. I work as an on-site IT coordinator, handling day-to-day IT operations for an industrial company. Between that and years of general sysadmin work, I’ve watched a lot of perfectly usable machines get pulled out of service and shipped off as e-waste — not because they were broken, but because someone decided they were “too old” for whatever OS they were running. A Core 2 Duo with a fresh SSD and a lightweight distro can still be a genuinely useful computer.That gap between “technically obsolete” and “actually still works great” is where a lot of my curiosity lives right now. The gap I kept running into The more I looked into the Norwegian Linux scene, the more I found — Skolelinux/Debian Edu has deep roots here, NUUG (Norwegian Unix User Group) has been active for decades, and there’s a project called PC-Aid that collects, wipes, and reinstalls Debian Edu on used PCs, then sends them to schoolchildren in Ukraine. It’s been running for a few years now, quietly doing real, tangible good. I wanted in. But when I looked for any of this activity near me — Sunnmøre, a district on Norway’s west coast (in Møre og Romsdal county, home to the town of Ålesund) — there was nothing. No local NUUG chapter, no meetup, no group. Just… a gap. (If you’re not from Norway, don’t worry, most Norwegians would need a map for this too.) So instead of waiting for someone else to fill it, I started SLUG — Sunnmøre Linux User Group. Reaching out, awkwardly, like you do Starting a group is the easy part. Getting it to mean anything is harder. So I did the obvious thing: I found people who’d actually been part of PC-Aid and reached out. First was someone who’d been active in the project early on. I sent a message

Clicks’ $99 Power Keyboard brings a customizable, slide-out physical keyboard to MagSafe and Qi2 smartphones, but its added heft can make larger phones awkward to use.

A compiled application cannot hot-reload itself if its main loop, window context, and memory allocations live inside the binary being recompiled. The application must be split into two layers:Host Shell (Stable Execution Root):Statically compiled once.Manages the OS window, render loop, event polling, network sockets, and high-level heap allocations.Exposes a dynamic symbol loader (dlopen / LoadLibrary or a dynamic WebAssembly runtime execution context).Guest Module (Hot-Swappable Logic):Compiled as a shared dynamic library (.so, .dylib, .dll) or an isolated WebAssembly (.wasm) module.Contains frame updates, business rules, rendering instructions, and component tree logic.Exports explicit interface hooks (init, update, render, pre_reload, post_reload).The Hot-Reload PipelineWhen a developer edits source code in a compiled language (e.g., modifying a Rust UI render function or a C# algorithm), the dev server orchestrates a zero-downtime swap through this explicit pipeline:1.File Watcher & Fast Incremental Compile:Sub-second artifact generation.The watcher detects source changes and invokes an incremental compilation pass using dynamic linking configurations (e.g., -rdynamic, dynamic C-runtime links, or fast lld/mold linkers) to output a versioned binary artifact (logic_v2.so).2.Live Manifest Update:Atomic state & symbol mapping emit.The dev server emits an updated JSON manifest containing module hash, exposed symbol tables, binary payload locations, and updated asset hashes over a WebSocket/IPC stream to the Host Shell.3.State Snapshot & Freeze:Preserving user context.The Host Shell signals pre_reload() to the currently loaded logic_v1.so. The guest logic serializes volatile runtime state into a host-managed memory buffer or leaves pointers active inside a host arena.4.Dynamic Unload & Library Swap:Operating system symbol rotation.The Host Shell unloads logic_v1.so (releasing file locks via temporary copy paths on OS platforms like Windows), loads logic_v2.so, and re

Companies that rely on Ceva Logistics for shipping their physical goods to customers say their personal data was taken during a recent cyberattack.

Platforms are finally recognizing that people don’t want to consume AI slop. A growing number of sites and apps now have tools and policies to flag, label, and ban AI-generated content.

When building and validating US stock quantitative strategies, I used to focus solely on core market data metrics. Like most individual quantitative developers, I prioritized the integrity of price candlesticks and trading volume data, assuming that complete K-line datasets would guarantee reliable backtesting outcomes that align with real-market performance. This assumption held true for small-scale tests and short-cycle verification, until I encountered persistent inconsistencies between historical backtest reports and live trading results. After thorough troubleshooting of strategy logic, parameter settings, and sliding point simulation, I finally pinpointed the root cause — inconsistent and inaccurate timestamp processing from market data APIs, a trivial-looking but critical engineering detail that most developers overlook. Most engineering teams devote massive effort to verifying the accuracy of US stock API quote data, yet ignore standardized processing for time fields. In quantitative trading systems, timestamp offset and timezone disorder are far more impactful than superficial chart display errors. They directly distort candlestick combinations, disrupt technical indicator calculations, and ultimately mislead the entry and exit signal judgments of trading strategies. Core Requirement: Time-series consistency for valid backtesting Market data is essentially a continuous time-series stream, where price and volume merely represent transaction outcomes at specific timestamps. The time dimension acts as the fundamental anchor that defines the exact position of every single trade in the market timeline. Unlike A-share market data that adopts a unified time standard, US stock data providers deliver multiple incompatible time formats across different APIs, including pure UTC time, US Eastern trading time, and original exchange timestamp fields. Without unified parsing and conversion logic in your program, timestamp misalignment and data dislocation are inevitable.

You open a new Spring Boot project and you create a DTO, then an entity, and you’re staring at getters, setters, constructors, equals() , hashCode() , toString() . Someone on the team suggests to put lombok’s @Data , or “just slap @Builder on it, it’ll be cleaner.” Forty lines become five and it looks great in the PR. Then it hits a real codebase, OpenAPI generation doesn't behave the way the build expects. Hibernate meets an auto-generated equals() and gets confused about identity. Something throws through a generated builder hierarchy at 2 AM, and the method you need to inspect doesn't exist in any file you can open. Eleven years into enterprise Java, my rule is simple: Lombok doesn't touch core application behavior. Not because writing a getter is interesting - it isn't, but because the handful of lines it saves rarely covers the compiler magic, tooling friction, and debugging problems it adds to something that has to survive for years after you've moved on to another project. "It just removes boilerplate" Worth asking what's actually being removed, though. A getter is part of your public API. A setter is a mutation point someone decided to expose. A constructor defines what states an object is allowed to enter. equals() and hashCode() define identity. toString() is what shows up in your logs when things go wrong at 3 AM. Write those by hand and they live in the source - visible, searchable, debuggable, owned by whoever's reading the file. Generate them with Lombok and the behavior is still there, it's just moved somewhere you can't see it without a separate step. The annotation most people reach for first time is @Data : @Data @Entity public class CustomerEntity { @Id @GeneratedValue private Long id ; private String email ; @OneToMany ( mappedBy = "customer" ) private List < OrderEntity > orders ; } One line and you get getters, setters, toString() , equals() , hashCode() across every field. For a JPA entity that's already a problem before you've written any bus

I used to think AI was making me lazy. I was wrong. AI wasn't making me lazy I was using AI as an...

Originally published on hexisteme notes . A predecessor note diagnosed three production features that passed every dedicated unit test and never executed at all, and why a unit test structurally can't see that gap. That note answered three cases I already knew about, because I'd already tripped over them. It didn't answer the question that matters once you've found three: how do you find the rest — the ones nobody happened to notice yet? This is that search: the tool that actually works, what it found across seven projects, and a fourth failure shape that the predecessor note's two fixes don't reach at all, because in that fourth shape the code was never the thing that was broken. The query, before the argument Before any of the specifics, here is the shape of the query, so you can run something like it against your own tables in under a minute: SELECT COUNT ( * ) AS total , SUM ( some_column IS NOT NULL ) AS filled FROM some_table ; If that comes back near 100%, this note may simply not apply to your codebase, and that's a real result, not a failure to reproduce it. Keep that in mind through the rest of this — every finding below is downstream of a query shaped like this one, not downstream of reading code and guessing. Grep is not the detector My first instinct, the same one the predecessor note's fixes point toward, was to grep for the failure shape — a default value, an unpopulated argument, a call site missing a keyword. In one afternoon it produced both a false positive and a false negative. The sharper miss: a literal grep for a write path failed to find an INSERT OR REPLACE statement that was, in fact, live and doing exactly the writing I was looking for. Grep matched the shape of the bug I expected walking in, not the shape the code actually had. Everything that survived scrutiny below came from asking a database a question, not from asking a shell how a string was spelled. The question that works is: of all the rows that exist, how many have this column fi

The AI-focused hedge fund is still making some big bets.

Originally published at https://ninadpathak.com/articles/technical-documentation-template/ . Creating documentation often forces several decisions at once: where readers begin, how they complete the first task, where exact details belong, and how they recover when a step fails. A template reduces that first pass to a structure you can inspect and adapt. I built this template to solve a narrow problem: an empty documentation repository leaves every contributor to invent navigation, page responsibilities, and release checks again. It provides five focused pages, a local validator, and a strict build path so the structure is useful before the product-specific writing begins. Download the technical documentation template Download the template Unpack the archive, then replace the placeholders with evidence from your product. The remaining sections show what belongs in each page and how to verify the result. What a technical documentation template should include A technical documentation template is a reusable starting structure for product or engineering documentation. It should tell a contributor where a reader begins, where they complete a task, where they look up stable details, and where they recover from a known failure. A table of contents alone cannot do that work. It can label a page “Getting started” without establishing prerequisites, a tested command, an expected result, or a recovery path. The starter contains five pages because they create a complete first route without pretending every product needs the same collection. Page Reader job Evidence to add before publishing index.md Choose the first useful task A direct route to the right starting page getting-started.md Complete first setup Prerequisites, a tested command, expected output guides/send-a-request.md Perform one bounded task A full request and response or observable state reference/configuration.md Look up stable details Names, types, defaults, and constraints troubleshooting.md Recover from a know

This article is about a poker-analysis framework, but the engineering problem is common to LLM tool use. The framework uses an LLM as an input and control layer. It reads a natural-language poker question, chooses a local calculator, and proposes typed fields. A Python program, not the LLM, performs the numerical calculation and returns a structured result with verification data. In this evaluation, a coordinator manually passed each calculator-eligible saved proposal to the command-line calculator; no automatic runtime bridge connected them. The design intent was to reduce manual arithmetic checking by sending numerical claims to deterministic, internally verified local software. The evaluation below tests whether those claims were checked and whether the handoff remained auditable. It did not measure time saved or the overall quality of the resulting poker analysis. The calculator catalog is poker-specific. This is not a poker strategy guide, and you do not need to know poker strategy to follow the failure. The question is whether a correct calculator can produce a verified result after the LLM chooses an interpretation without asking the user to confirm it. The workflow was tested with 25 hand-authored cases that were fixed before execution. They are labeled C01 through C25: C01–C23 tested the LLM's routing, proposed input, and boundary decisions; C24 and C25 repeated two accepted inputs to check non-volatile result semantics. The labels are test numbers, not poker terminology. The main example uses one small pot-odds model. In this model, the pot is the shared pool of chips the players are competing for. The calculator's inputs are: pot_before_bet : the amount already in the pot before the opponent's new bet; opponent_bet : the amount the opponent adds; call_cost : the amount the player must add to continue; expected_rake : an optional amount removed from the final pot. The calculation is: net final pot = pot_before_bet + opponent_bet + call_cost - expected_rake

My expense app finally has a point of view on what I'm spending money on. No AI yet — just honest keyword rules, a nullable column, and one interface that means I can bolt an LLM on later without ripping anything out. Here's the build, three "empty value" bugs that bit me, and the habits that kept it clean. Index Where we left off The plan: rules first, AI behind the same door Step 1 — A nullable column (and why nullable matters) Step 2 — The migration: generate → review → apply Step 3 — A dumb-but-working categorize() Step 4 — Wiring it into create (with override precedence) Step 5 — The seam: extracting behind a Categorizer interface Step 6 — The UI loop: show, add, edit 🐛 The war story: three ways "empty" lied to me Thinking like an attacker Learning shortcut vs. production Key habits to keep Next up: Phase 7b Where we left off Phase 6 gave me the receipts — date-range reports and CSV export. I ended that post with a promise: Next up: Phase 7, where categories finally enter the schema and the app starts to get opinionated about what I'm spending on. This is that. But it turned into a bigger beast than one post, so I'm splitting it: Phase 7a (this post): the schema, a rules-based categorizer, the interface seam, and the full UI loop. Phase 7b (next): the actual LLM — an LLMCategorizer that slots in behind the same interface, with caching and a rules fallback. Doing rules first isn't a cop-out. It's the whole strategy. The plan: rules first, AI behind the same door The temptation with "AI categorization" is to reach straight for the API key. I didn't. Here's the order I actually built in, and why: Step What Why this order 1 Nullable category column The app needs somewhere to store a category before it can fill one 2 Rules categorize() A working, free, offline fallback — and a baseline to test against 3 Extract behind an interface So the LLM can slot in later without touching call sites 4 UI loop (show / add / edit) Give the human final say, no matter how smart the