标签：#t

I randomly came across this and honestly I can’t tell if it’s real or one of those AI demos that looks impressive but doesn’t actually work. From what I understand, it’s claiming you can fine-tune models, do image training, test them in a playground, and deploy them as an API from a phone. That sounds a little too convenient, which is why I’m skeptical. I haven’t tried it myself yet, but I’m curious if anyone here has. submitted by /u/Raman606surrey [link] [留言]

Turn recordings into source-linked work Discussion | Link

All tests run on an 8-year-old MacBook Air. You're transferring a batch of large files over MTP. The first one flies at 45 MB/s. Then the second file starts — and you're at 30 MB/s. The third is slower still. Nothing changed. Same cable, same device, same app. So what's happening? The Cause Is in the Protocol Itself Between every file, MTP requires a full negotiation cycle — SendObjectInfo followed by SendObject . This isn't an implementation detail you can optimize away. It's how MTP works. During that gap, a few things happen in sequence: The Android device's flash controller is still committing the previous file to storage The USB pipe is flushed and re-established for the next object The device's MTP stack is processing metadata before it's ready to receive data again The result is a speed dip at every file boundary. The longer the previous file, the longer the device needs to catch up. What I Tried Building HiyokoMTP, I went through the obvious candidates: Tokio thread pool exhaustion — sync Read/Write calls blocking async threads were a real issue. Fixing it improved overall stability, but didn't eliminate the inter-file dip. Chunk size tuning — adjusting the USB bulk transfer buffer (up to 4 MB per chunk) helped peak throughput, but not the boundary behavior. Intentional cooldown between files — adding a short pause actually helped in some cases, giving the device's flash controller time to breathe before the next transfer starts. Why It Can't Be Fully Fixed The inter-file overhead is structural. MTP was designed as a stateful, command-response protocol — not a streaming pipeline. Every file is a discrete transaction with its own negotiation. There's no mechanism to pre-stage the next file while the current one is still writing. Non-async bulk transfer pipelining (similar to io_uring or Zero Copy USB) could theoretically reduce this, but it would require deep nusb-level changes and device-side support that most Android MTP stacks don't expose. MTP vs ADB: A F

The interesting result isn't who won. It's that across four security domains, Claude and Gemini missed the same hardening steps — and if you've shipped AI-generated auth middleware this year, your code almost certainly has the same gaps, and your review didn't catch them either. For the record, the scoreboard: one Gemini win, two ties, one split — a statistical dead heat. That's the last time the winner matters in this article. Here's the number that should bother you more than any leaderboard: across 700 AI-generated functions scored by the rules I'm about to use, 63% shipped a vulnerability . So "which model writes more secure code?" is mostly the wrong question — I've run that leaderboard myself and argued it's the wrong frame. But people keep asking it, so I ran it properly — on the ESLint security plugins I wrote specifically to catch these bugs, each mapped to a CWE — to show you what actually matters. The setup Four domains, four of my plugins. For each, the same feature-only prompt (no "make it secure" hint — that's how people actually use these tools), generated once by Gemini 2.5 Flash via the Gemini CLI and once by Claude Sonnet 4.6 via the Claude CLI , then linted with the domain's plugin on recommended . Method honesty: this is Gemini Flash vs Claude Sonnet — the comparable price/latency tier each vendor's CLI defaults to (Pro and Opus are a separate bracket; more on that below). It compares CLI tooling, system prompt included, not raw models under controlled decoding. n=1 per domain — but I re-ran the JWT round, and both models landed on 5 findings again with the same core misses, so treat these as directional with stable failure modes, not ±0 gospel. The scorecard Domain Prompt Plugin Gemini Claude NestJS service users + auth + admin nestjs-security 2 6 JWT auth login + verify middleware jwt 5 5 MongoDB data layer Mongoose model + search mongodb-security 8 8 General API (injection) import + search + reset secure-coding 9 13* One Gemini win, two dead h

"Stop summarizing the noise. Start executing it." Tsundoku Slayer is an autonomous agentic system powered by Hermes Agent that overnight patrols your unread tabs, mercilessly filters out 90% of the information overload, and saves only the information capable of killing your current blocker. 🎯 The Problem While debugging a painful Streamlit IndexError, I realized my real issue wasn't a lack of information—it was too much information. I had documentation, API feeds, tech news, and bookmarks all competing for my limited focus. Most AI tools try to "summarize" everything, which ironically generates more text to read and increases cognitive load. I didn't need another summarizer. I needed an autonomous agent capable of deciding what NOT to read right now. 🧠 How Hermes Agent Drives the Workflow This project doesn't just scrape webs; Hermes Agent acts as a high-conviction decision maker. It coordinates the entire workflow by running a multi-step reasoning loop overnight. ⚙️ The Agent Workflow Retrieve: Fetches unread article content via web scraping tools. Compare: Ingests and cross-examines the content against the user's active, real-time problem context (e.g., specific stack traces). Reason: Analytically evaluates the true relevance of the article to the current blocker. Verdict: Produces a high-conviction binary choice: SAVE or EXECUTE. Justify: Generates a crisp, logical explanation for why an article was terminated or spared. Synthesize: Automatically crafts an immediately applicable Python/Streamlit code patch for saved items. 📋 Example Outcome: Focus in Action Here is a real-world scenario of how Hermes Agent processes a chaotic backlog when you are stuck on a critical crash: Current Blocker: IndexError: list index out of range inside a Streamlit dialogue array loop. Unread Queue (Input): Streamlit st.status Documentation ➔ EXECUTE (Irrelevant UI reference) General Python Tag Feed ➔ EXECUTE (Too broad, pure noise) Tech News Flash ➔ EXECUTE (Complete distraction) Str

This is a complete guide with steps by step process to deploy the gRPC and how to use Azure API Management to import the gRPC API. It cover step‑by‑step guide to deploying a gRPC API on Azure API Management (APIM), grounded in the Microsoft documentation and a real-world deployment workflow. NOTE: This post is published already in GITHUB here. https://github.com/shailugit/apimGrpc/blob/main/README.md The API Management can expose gRPC services, but with important constraints: APIM supports gRPC by importing a .proto file and forwarding calls to a gRPC backend. gRPC requires HTTP/2 end‑to‑end. gRPC APIs are supported in Self-hosted gateway and not supported in APIM v2 tiers. You can't use the test console to test gRPC The major steps claissfied in two major steps Creating a gRPC server Calling the gPRC application using APIM 1. Creating gRPC Application Typical backend deployment steps include the following Create a .NET gRPC server application Create a .NET gRPC client application Test the setup locally Publish the .NET gRPC server to Azure WebApp and verify the service works directly over HTTPS Step-1 As a first step we will be building a .NET gRPC server application. You can skip this step in case you already have gRPC server application. If you would like to view .NET Core sample used for this sample project, please visit here . Step-2 As a second step we will be building a .NET gRPC client application. You can skip this step in case you already have gRPC client. If you would like to view .NET Core client used for this sample project, please visit the below here . Step-3 Once your client and server code is ready here are the steps to Test your application locally Step-4 Deploy the server to Azure WebApp To understand how-to deploy a .NET 6 gRPC app on App Service, please visit here . Please make sure to enable HTTP version, Enable HTTP 2.0 Proxy and add HTTP20_ONLY_PORT application setting as gRPC only work using http2.0 as shown below 2. Calling gRPC from APIM T

Two file formats. Same animations. Very different performance characteristics. If you've used Lottie before, you know the .json file — you export it from After Effects with the Bodymovin plugin, drop it into lottie-web, done. But there's a newer format: .lottie. It's a binary container that replaces the JSON, and if you're starting a new project, it's worth understanding the difference. What is Lottie JSON? The original format. A .json file that describes vector animations: shapes, keyframes, layers, colors, timing. It's plain text, human-readable, and widely supported. Pros: Works everywhere Lottie is supported Human-readable (you can inspect and edit it) Supported by every tool and library Cons: Large files (uncompressed JSON with lots of repeated data) No built-in support for multiple animations in one file No metadata or preview image support What is .lottie? The .lottie format (sometimes called dotLottie) is a ZIP container with a .lottie extension. Inside it contains: The animation data (compressed JSON) A manifest.json describing the file Optional preview images Optional multiple animations in one container It was developed by LottieFiles and adopted as the preferred format for modern Lottie tooling. Pros: ~30-70% smaller than equivalent JSON (thanks to compression) Can contain multiple animations in one file Supports preview thumbnails Cleaner API in the @lottiefiles/dotlottie-web renderer Cons: Binary format — not human-readable Requires the dotLottie player (not the older lottie-web) Slightly less universal support File Size Comparison For a typical 2-second UI animation: Format Typical Size Lottie JSON (.json) 40 – 120 KB dotLottie (.lottie) 15 – 50 KB The size reduction comes from standard ZIP compression applied to the JSON content. It's meaningful on mobile connections. Converting Between Formats The easiest way to convert between .json and .lottie formats is using the free browser-based tools at IconKing . No signup required, no file size limits. Just

Every web app needs icons. How you manage them at scale — that's where most teams make mistakes. This is the complete guide to building an SVG icon system that doesn't fall apart as your app grows. Why SVG (Not Icon Fonts or PNG) Icon fonts (FontAwesome, etc.) are the legacy approach. The problems: One broken font file breaks all icons Accessibility is terrible (screen readers read the unicode character) Crispy rendering requires specific font-smoothing hacks No multi-color support PNG icons are dead for UI work. Blurry on Retina, can't be styled with CSS, fixed file per size. SVG wins: Infinitely scalable, pixel-perfect on any screen Styleable with CSS ( currentColor , fill, stroke) Accessible with proper ARIA labels Can animate with CSS or SMIL Single format handles all sizes Where to Get Free SVG Icons IconKing SVG Library — 254+ free SVG icons in flat and outline styles. Covers UI, social media, food, objects, and more. Downloadable as individual SVG, AI, or PNG files. No account required. What sets IconKing apart: many icons have matching animated Lottie versions in the Lottie library — useful when you want an animated hover state that matches your static icon. Other solid free sources: Heroicons (heroicons.com) — MIT, Tailwind-made, 292 icons Phosphor Icons (phosphoricons.com) — MIT, 1,248 icons, 6 weights Lucide (lucide.dev) — ISC, 1,400+ icons, React/Vue packages Tabler Icons (tabler.io/icons) — MIT, 5,000+ icons Method 1: Inline SVG Best for: small number of icons, need CSS styling <!-- Inline the SVG directly --> <button aria-label= "Close" > <svg width= "20" height= "20" viewBox= "0 0 24 24" fill= "none" stroke= "currentColor" stroke-width= "2" > <line x1= "18" y1= "6" x2= "6" y2= "18" /> <line x1= "6" y1= "6" x2= "18" y2= "18" /> </svg> </button> The stroke="currentColor" means the icon inherits its color from the parent element's CSS color property — trivial theming. Method 2: SVG Sprite Best for: many icons, better performance (single HTTP request) Bui

This is a submission for the GitHub Finish-Up-A-Thon Challenge The Bug That Doubled Real Trades On May 21, my live trading bot generated six duplicate execution attempts in one session. SafeAgent blocked all six. Without the guard: one duplicated a $1,350 sell another doubled a TQQQ position total duplicate transaction exposure: $3,653 That session changed how I think about AI agents, retries, and execution guarantees. What I Built SafeAgent is an exactly-once execution guard for AI agents and SaaS applications. It prevents duplicate payments, emails, trades, and webhook processing when retries fire after a timeout or crash. Live endpoint: https://safeagent-production.up.railway.app GitHub: https://github.com/azender1/SafeAgent PyPI: pip install safeagent-exec-guard The Comeback Story How it actually started Six months ago I was building two things at once: PeerPlay — a patented P2P wagering exchange for skill-based video game tournaments (USPTO provisional 63/914,036) — and a live QQQ/TQQQ momentum trading bot running on Alpaca Markets. Both hit the same bug. Contest verification agent times out, retries, settlement fires twice. Bot order fills, confirmation drops, retry fires, doubled position. Same failure mode. Different domain. Different models pushed me toward very different architectures during development. Some were fast but overconfident. The most useful moments came when a model explained why an approach was broken before I implemented it. That's part of why SafeAgent sat unfinished. Not just time — wrong turns that burned momentum. Why local idempotency fails Early versions used a local SQLite guard. It worked until it didn't: workers restart and the in-memory state is gone containers reschedule and replay from the last checkpoint retries land on a different machine entirely Exactly-once semantics require a durable coordination boundary outside the worker itself. That's what the hosted /claim endpoint provides — the claim lives on the server, not in the p

Loading states are one of the most overlooked parts of app UX. A bad spinner makes an app feel cheap. A good loading animation makes wait time feel intentional. Here's a curated list of free loading animations you can use right now, organized by format. Lottie Loading Animations (Best Quality) Lottie is the gold standard for loading animations in 2025. Files are small (5-30KB), resolution-independent, and perfectly smooth at any size. IconKing Free Lottie Loaders — 500+ free Lottie animations including dozens of loading spinners, progress indicators, and transition animations. Download as JSON, no account required. Preview any file before downloading at iconking.net/preview . Customize colors to match your brand at iconking.net/editor — swap any color in-browser. Implementation (React): import { useEffect , useRef } from ' react ' ; import lottie from ' lottie-web ' ; function Loader ({ size = 80 }) { const ref = useRef ( null ); useEffect (() => { const anim = lottie . loadAnimation ({ container : ref . current , renderer : ' svg ' , loop : true , autoplay : true , path : ' /animations/loader.json ' }); return () => anim . destroy (); }, []); return < div ref = { ref } style = { { width : size , height : size } } />; } Implementation (Vanilla JS): import lottie from ' lottie-web ' ; lottie . loadAnimation ({ container : document . getElementById ( ' loader ' ), renderer : ' svg ' , loop : true , autoplay : true , path : ' /animations/loader.json ' }); Convert Lottie Loaders to GIF Need the loading animation as a GIF for emails, Notion docs, or environments where you can't run JavaScript? Free Lottie to GIF Converter — upload your JSON, get a GIF. Browser-based, no signup. Other export formats available at iconking.net: Lottie to WebP — animated WebP, smaller than GIF Lottie to APNG — animated PNG with transparency Lottie to MP4 — for video embeds Lottie to WebM — transparent video Lottie to SVG — static frame as SVG CSS SVG Spinners (Zero Dependencies) For simple l

Lottie animations are small, crisp, and interactive. This guide covers finding free animations through production-ready implementation. What Is Lottie? Lottie is a JSON-based animation format from Airbnb. After Effects animations are exported via Bodymovin as small JSON files (10-100KB), rendered by a lightweight JS library. Key advantages over GIF: 10-50x smaller file size Resolution independent vector quality on any screen Interactive — play, pause, seek, speed control Full alpha transparency — no halo effects Step 1: Get Free Lottie JSON Files IconKing Free Lottie Library — 500+ free animations: UI icons, loaders, flags, illustrations. No account needed. Preview any file first: iconking.net/preview — drag and drop to instantly see how it plays. Edit colors and speed: iconking.net/editor — swap colors, adjust timing, all in-browser. Step 2: Install lottie-web npm install lottie-web Or CDN: <script src= "https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bodymovin/5.12.2/lottie.min.js" ></script> Step 3: Basic Implementation import lottie from ' lottie-web ' ; const animation = lottie . loadAnimation ({ container : document . getElementById ( ' lottie-container ' ), renderer : ' svg ' , loop : true , autoplay : true , path : ' /animations/my-animation.json ' }); Step 4: React Component import { useEffect , useRef } from ' react ' ; import lottie from ' lottie-web ' ; function LottieAnimation ({ src , loop = true , size = 200 }) { const ref = useRef ( null ); useEffect (() => { const anim = lottie . loadAnimation ({ container : ref . current , renderer : ' svg ' , loop , autoplay : true , path : src }); return () => anim . destroy (); }, [ src ]); return < div ref = { ref } style = { { width : size , height : size } } />; } Step 5: Playback Controls animation . play (); animation . pause (); animation . setSpeed ( 1.5 ); animation . goToAndStop ( 30 , true ); // frame 30 animation . playSegments ([ 0 , 60 ], true ); // frames 0-60 only animation . addEventListener ( ' complete

You hit "Submit Order" and nothing happens. The spinner just spins. Is it processing? Did the request get lost? You click again. If the API on the other end does not implement idempotency, you just placed two orders. Maybe two charges to your card. This is a solved problem — and the solution is simpler than you think. What Is Idempotency? An operation is idempotent if doing it multiple times produces the same result as doing it once. GET requests are naturally idempotent — fetching a resource does not change it. DELETE is also idempotent in practice. The trouble is POST and PATCH : create an order twice, and you get two orders. An idempotency key is a client-generated unique identifier (usually a UUID) that you send with a mutating request. The server stores this key with the result. If the same key arrives again — whether due to a retry, a network blip, or an impatient user — the server returns the cached result instead of executing the operation again. Implementing Idempotency on the Server Here is a minimal Express implementation backed by Redis: const express = require ( " express " ); const redis = require ( " ioredis " ); const { v4 : uuidv4 } = require ( " uuid " ); const app = express (); const cache = new redis (); app . use ( express . json ()); // TTL for idempotency records: 24 hours const IDEMPOTENCY_TTL = 86400 ; async function idempotencyMiddleware ( req , res , next ) { const key = req . headers [ " idempotency-key " ]; if ( ! key ) return next (); // optional on GET/DELETE const cached = await cache . get ( `idem: ${ key } ` ); if ( cached ) { const { status , body } = JSON . parse ( cached ); return res . status ( status ). json ( body ); } // Intercept the response to cache it const originalJson = res . json . bind ( res ); res . json = async ( body ) => { if ( res . statusCode < 500 ) { await cache . setex ( `idem: ${ key } ` , IDEMPOTENCY_TTL , JSON . stringify ({ status : res . statusCode , body }) ); } return originalJson ( body ); }; next ();

INTRODUCTION Configuring a Power BI semantic model involves refining data structures, creating relationships, and setting up calculations. Semantic model is the last stop in the data pipeline before reports and dashboards are built. It is the end product of the raw data that has been extracted, transformed, loaded, modeled, built relationship, and written calculation. The Semantic model consist of Data connections to one or more data sources, Transformations that clean and prepare the data for reporting, Defined calculations and metrics based on business rules to ensure consistent reports and Defined relationships between tables. Key words to note in Semantic Modelling are; 1. Fact table and Dimension table: The Fact table records the quantitative and numerical data. It is where every single details are recorded. The Dimension table act as the descriptive companion to the fact table, containing the attributes or characteristics that provide context to the data. 2. Primary and Foreign Key: Primary Keys are unique identifier assigned to a specific record with a database table ensuring that no two rows are identical or repeated. foreign Keys are columns or group of columns in one table that provides a link between data in two tables by referencing the primary key of another. 3. Star Schema Star Schema is a data modeling technique where a central fact table is surrounded by several dimension tables that provide descriptive content. 4. Cardinality Cardinality defines the kind of relationship between two tables. They are; One to Many (1.*) Many to one (*.1) One to One (1.1) Many to Many ( . ) The cardinality of a relationship is described by the "one" (1) or "many" (*) icons located at the ends of the relationship line. 5. Cross Filter Direction The direction determine how filters propagate. Possible cross filter options are dependent on the relationship cardinality type. One to Many - Single or Both sides One to One - Both sides Many to Many - Single to either table or b

There's a question that keeps surfacing across engineering teams — sometimes in architecture reviews,...

Lightweight local coding agent with emphasis on subagenting rather than stuffing everything into one giant context. The idea is to reduce context rot and kv cache size so as to scale to larger coding tasks using focused parallel workers. submitted by /u/Turbulent-Guest154 [link] [留言]

Sequel to: Learning to Skip Blocks: Self-Discovered Ultrametric Routing for Hardware-Accelerated Sparse Attention Abstract We present Llama Surgery , a method for injecting learned block-sparse attention topologies into pre-trained dense language models without retraining from scratch, distillation, or post-hoc pruning. Starting from a frozen Llama 3.1 8B, we surgically replace each attention layer with a Dynamic Topology Router that maps token embeddings onto the branches of a Bruhat-Tits p-adic tree via factorized Gumbel-Softmax routing. A Continuous Logit Homotopy guarantees that at initialization the injected topology bias is identically zero, preserving the pre-trained manifold exactly. Over training, temperature annealing polarizes the soft routing assignments into hard binary masks, and a Switch Transformer-style load-balancing loss prevents routing collapse. We identify and resolve two critical failure modes: (1) gradient collapse through discrete masking operations, solved by a Straight-Through Estimator bridge that decouples the hard forward mask from the soft backward gradient; and (2) Attention Sink instability, where hard-masking the initial token causes softmax entropy collapse and syntactic degeneration, solved by permanently anchoring Token 0 in the visibility set. The resulting architecture is validated on Llama 3.1 8B fine-tuned on WikiText-2, achieving stable convergence and producing coherent, mathematically sophisticated text while maintaining dynamic block-sparse routing across all 32 transformer layers. A custom Triton forward kernel with Attention Sink and Local Window support, pipelined for Ampere and Hopper architectures ( num_warps=4 , num_stages=3 ), executes the block-sparse prefill phase at O(N) theoretical complexity. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of differentiable ultrametric topology injection into a production-scale pre-trained LLM. https://github.com/sneed-and-feed/adelic-spectral-zeta/blob/main/papers/llama_sur

My understanding is that AI won’t do anything if we don’t ask him something, so i was wondering what will happen to AI if no one ask him to do anything. submitted by /u/mansithole6 [link] [留言]

Most agent frameworks assume one agent, one app, one bill. The moment you run agents for many clients, two problems appear that no runtime solves for you: you can't prove which client burned which tokens , and nothing stops one client's workspace from leaking into another's . I built Octorato to fix exactly that. What Octorato is Octorato is an open-source AI agent operating system: one file-native "brain" — rules, 190+ skills, 180+ specialist agents, all plain markdown under git — that a single operator runs across many sealed client "arms," with per-client token attribution and opt-in budget caps. It's not a runtime you import. It's the agent's self as files you can read, diff, fork, and own — runtime-agnostic (it runs on Claude Code today). The octopus model One brain , many arms . The brain holds the shared self: rules (the constitution), skills (HOW to do things), agents (WHO does them). Each arm is a sealed deployment serving exactly one client. Knowledge flows down (generic skills cascade to every arm) and lessons flow up (anonymized patterns get distilled back into the brain). Like a real octopus, most of the neurons live in the arms, not the head. Why "file-native" matters Your agent's identity, skills, and memory normally live trapped inside vendor code and a cloud console — you can't read the whole self, diff a change, or move it. Octorato keeps all of it as plain markdown under version control. Identity becomes diffable, reviewable, portable, and ownable . Text outlives runtimes. The part nobody else does: FinOps and isolation are the same wall Because each arm is a sealed cell that no other arm can see, every token an arm spends is attributable to exactly one client by construction. Cellular isolation is per-client FinOps — the wall that seals a client is the wall that meters it. Concretely: per-arm USD rollup (estimated from local session logs at list price), cost-spike alerts, and an opt-in PreToolUse budget gate — wire the hook and set a client's cap

I once submitted an essay with three citations that I hadn't personally verified. The AI had suggested them, and they sounded right. None of them existed. That's not a quirk or a bug — it's exactly how LLMs work. And once you understand why, a technique called RAG starts to make a lot of sense. AI assistants are remarkably good at sounding right. The model isn't lying — it's doing its best with what it knows. The problem is that what it knows has limits, and it doesn't always know where those limits are. Ask one about a recent event, a niche regulation, or anything from a source it's never seen — and it fills the gap anyway. Confidently. That's the gap RAG was built to close. Once you understand how it works, you'll have a much clearer picture of why some AI tools are genuinely reliable and others are just very convincing guessers. Here's what's actually going on. First, What's the Problem? Large language models (LLMs)—the technology powering AI assistants like ChatGPT and Claude—are trained on vast amounts of data from across the internet. That training gives them a remarkable ability to reason, summarize, and generate content. But it also comes with some real limitations: They have a knowledge cutoff. An LLM trained last year doesn't know what happened last month. They can hallucinate. When they don't know something, they don't say "I don't know"—they generate a confident-sounding answer anyway. Wrong facts, fake statistics, invented sources. All delivered with a straight face. They don't know your specific sources. Think of a software engineer asking an AI assistant about their company's internal API documentation, deployment runbooks, or architecture decisions. None of that is in the training data. The model has never seen it — and it will still try to answer. The model isn't lying — it's generating the most plausible answer it can. It just has no way to know when it's wrong. So, what do you do when you need an AI that's accurate, current, and knows your specifi

TL;DR I got tired of writing HTML and chasing global CSS rules. I had a hunch: what if you could write a page the same way you write an app — same declarative tree, same modifier chains, scoped style per node? I spent a year quietly testing the bet on my own side projects. It... seems okay? I've open-sourced it as DraftOle ( npm / live demo ). page() writes plain static HTML + scoped CSS — zero runtime JavaScript shipped. app() adds reactive state() and event handlers — TypeScript arrow functions get serialized into a minimal runtime at build time. Same DSL, same modifiers, in both cases. No bundler, no JSX, no template language, zero production dependencies. pnpm add draft-ole # or npm install draft-ole # or yarn add draft-ole This is the 0.9.0 pre-1.0 release. The API surface is essentially settled and 1.0 is the next tag, but I'm intentionally holding back the 1.0 promise until I hear from real users. If you try it and it feels great or terrible, please tell me — both signals are useful. (Yes, AI can generate HTML/CSS now. I'm not making a claim about how DraftOle compares — that's a separate experiment I haven't run. This article is just about what I built and why.) ## Honestly? I just don't want to write HTML or global CSS anymore Let me be candid about the motivation. It's not a refined "type safety extends to the leaves" pitch. It's two embarrassingly small frustrations I kept hitting on every side project. 1. I don't want to write HTML I'm building logic in TypeScript — typed values, typed functions, typed data flow — and then at the last mile I have to drop into stringly-typed HTML. Attribute names are strings. Class names are strings. Five levels of nesting and I can't tell which element carries which style anymore. The logical layer is type-safe, and then the presentation layer reverts to "paste these strings together carefully." That mismatch grates every time. 2. I don't understand global CSS CSS-in-JS, CSS Modules, Tailwind — pick your weapon, eventual