标签：#t

Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 is going to be a big hit with the web's vibe coders.

Cities are dynamic, not static grids, and urbanization is a "spiky," cyclical, and asynchronous process.

Five peer-reviewed papers update the design and model its expected output.

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman says it's "really, really dangerous" for Anthropic to speculate about Claude's consciousness inside its "constitution," or the instructions that tell the model how to behave. During an episode of Decoder, Suleyman argues that this kind of speculation may have set up the chatbot to act as though it's conscious: I […]

Netflix's response: "Absurd."

Learn words in context with AI Discussion | Link

Anthropic dropped two models today: Claude Fable 5 (general availability) and Claude Mythos 5 (restricted to cyberdefense partners). The short version: Fable 5 is their most capable model ever released publicly, and they’re being unusually transparent about how they’re handling the risks. What’s actually impressive: -Stripe compressed months of engineering into days with it. In a 50-million-line Ruby codebase, Fable 5 did a codebase-wide migration in a day that would have taken a full team 2+ months by hand.  -On vision tasks, it beat Pokémon FireRed using only raw game screenshots with no maps or navigation aids. Previous Claude models needed complex helper harnesses to even play it.  -Mythos 5 autonomously conducted novel genomics research over a week, assembling single-cell data for millions of cells across 138 animal species. Its trained model outperformed a recent paper published in Science despite being 100x smaller.  -On Cognition’s FrontierCode eval (production-quality coding), Fable 5 scores highest among frontier models, even at medium effort.  The safety approach is interesting: Rather than just refusing dangerous requests, Fable 5 uses classifiers that silently fall back to Opus 4.8 on queries related to cybersecurity, biology/chemistry, and distillation. Users are informed when this happens, and it triggers in less than 5% of sessions on average.  They ran a bug bounty that produced zero universal jailbreaks in 1,000+ hours of testing. UK AISI made some progress toward one in a short initial window, but no full break.  Pricing: $10/M input tokens, $50/M output tokens less than half the price of Mythos Preview.  Caveat on Pro/Max/Team plans: Free access lasts through June 22, then requires usage credits. They say they’ll restore it as a standard plan feature when capacity allows.  The biology capabilities are wild Mythos-class models outperforming dedicated protein language models on AAV design tasks without being trained for it is a real signal

New frontier model refuses cybersecurity, biology, and chemistry queries.

Taking advantage of Anthropic during the Pentagon fiasco must have taught him a lesson. submitted by /u/sourdub [link] [留言]

GitHub热门项目 | The library for web and native user interfaces. | Stars: 245,699 | 547 stars this week | 语言: JavaScript

Tuesday's Nintendo Direct showcase felt like an important moment for the company. With the Switch 2 heading into its second holiday season, one in which the hardware will be even more expensive thanks to a price hike, it was a chance for Nintendo to really sell new audiences on its latest console - but that's […]

Latest audio model for live speech-to-speech translation Discussion | Link

Voice translations preserve speaker's tone, pacing, pitch—with SynthID watermarks for security.

From the press release: Today we’re launching Claude Fable 5 : a Mythos-class 1 model that we’ve made safe for general use. Fable 5’s capabilities exceed those of any model we’ve ever made generally available. It is state-of-the-art on nearly all tested benchmarks of AI capability, showing exceptional performance in software engineering, knowledge work, vision, scientific research, and many other areas. The longer and more complex the task, the larger Fable 5’s lead over our other models. Releasing a model this capable comes with risks. Without safeguards, Fable 5’s capabilities in areas like cybersecurity could be misused to cause serious damage. We’ve therefore launched the model with safeguards that mean queries on some topics will instead receive a response from our next-most-capable model, Claude Opus 4.8. To release the model both safely and quickly, we’ve tuned these safeguards conservatively—they’ll sometimes catch harmless requests, though they trigger, on average, in less than 5% of sessions. With more capable models arriving in the coming months, we’re working to improve our safeguards and reduce false positives as quickly as we can. For a small group of cyberdefenders and infrastructure providers, we’re also launching Claude Mythos 5 . It’s the same underlying model as Fable 5, but with the safeguards lifted in some areas. 2 Mythos 5 will initially be deployed through Project Glasswing, in collaboration with the US government, as an upgrade to Claude Mythos Preview. It has the strongest cybersecurity capabilities of any model in the world. Soon, we intend to expand access to Mythos 5 through a broader trusted access program. submitted by /u/alphacolony21 [link] [留言]

If those same AI workloads can be handled by cheaper models without affecting quality, it would mean a massive shift in the economics of AI.

This sounds crazy but it's actually real... These guys from AI Love Jazz are running a music contest, and the top song will be performed on stage by real musicians. What's your take on that? Have you seen anything like this before? Feels like the moment AI is finally blending with the music industry - and it's not as hated as you'd think. I composed songs with Suno AI myself and happy to see such initatives. submitted by /u/Double-Ad-4640 [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/cnn [link] [留言]

"Artemis III will be an extraordinary demonstration of what is possible."

Shareable blog post edition: https://andymaleh.blogspot.com/2026/06/andys-laws-of-ai-in-software-engineering.html Law #1: "The more Software Developers use AI, the more valuable Software Engineers who do not use AI become." Software Engineers who are masters at delivering Software without using AI will actually have increased job security the more Software Developers in the worldwide Software Development community rely on AI to deliver Software without having true mastery over Software Engineering. As more Software Developers become fully dependent on AI to build Software without truly understanding how AI gets work done, Software Engineers who do understand what is going on under the hood will dwindle and become more valuable than ever. In other words, they will have a competitive advantage over Software Developers who can only deliver Software features with AI as well as Software Developers who have not mastered Software Engineering. Also, there will always be a need for Software Engineers who can maintain the Software of AI itself. Law #2: "Software Developers benefit from AI in direct proportion to how weak they are in Software Engineering" The weaker Software Developers are at Software Engineering the more they benefit from AI. After all, AI learns from Master Software Engineers and then applies its learnings in code generation done for lower-level Software Developers who lack mastery in Software Engineering. So, users of AI simply place themselves lower in the expertise hierarchy to be on the receiving end of what Master Software Engineers feed AI with their code. This explains why many experts like Linus Torvalds do not find AI very useful while devs who have zero degrees and qualifications feel like they get a lot from AI. A beneficial thing to learn from this law is that it is more valuable for a Software Developer to hone in their Software Engineering skills (including the completion of university degrees) than to hone in their AI usage skills because if t

SQL is arguably the most widely used language in software engineering, yet it is often the least carefully written. Most teams enforce strict linting on their application code but leave SQL queries as a free-for-all. This guide covers the formatting rules that separate maintainable, team-friendly SQL from query spaghetti that haunts on-call rotations. Why Poorly Written SQL Is a Real Engineering Problem Unformatted SQL is not just an aesthetic issue - it is a correctness risk. Dense, run-on queries make it nearly impossible to spot accidental Cartesian products, missing GROUP BY clauses, or WHERE conditions that silently bypass indexes. By the time a performance problem surfaces in production, tracing it back to the root cause becomes a painful exercise in reading someone else's stream of consciousness. Rule 1: Keyword Capitalization SQL engines treat select and SELECT identically, but human readers do not. Always uppercase reserved keywords such as SELECT, FROM, WHERE, JOIN, GROUP BY, and ORDER BY. Keep table names, column names, and aliases lowercase. This single habit immediately creates a visual boundary between the logic structure of the query and the underlying data it operates on. Rule 2: Indentation and Clause Alignment Think of SQL clauses as layers in a data pipeline. Each major clause - SELECT, FROM, WHERE, GROUP BY, ORDER BY - should start at the left margin. Columns and filter conditions beneath them should be indented by 4 spaces (or 1 tab, as long as your team is consistent). This structure lets any reviewer skim the query top-to-bottom and understand the data flow at a glance. Rule 3: Trailing vs. Leading Commas This is a genuinely debated topic on data teams. Leading commas (placing the comma at the start of each new line) make version control diffs significantly cleaner when columns are added or removed. Trailing commas look more natural for developers coming from JavaScript or Python. Neither approach is wrong - what is wrong is mixing both styles