标签：#t

Our rebranded Boston event, TechCrunch Founder Summit (formerly All Stage), is back on November 4th! And we are looking for some incredible volunteers to help us make this event happen. If you are interested in finding out what goes into building tech events, apply to volunteer. If you are selected, not only will you get […]

Every backtest has to answer a boring question: when the strategy says "buy," what price does it actually get? Most backtesting frameworks answer this question badly by default, and the badness is almost always in the strategy's favor. Here are the four assumptions that do the most damage, roughly in order of how often they show up. Mid-price fills If your backtest fills orders at the midpoint of the bid-ask spread, you are assuming you trade for free. You don't. A market order pays at least half the spread to cross it; a marketable limit order pays something close to that too, once you're honest about how often it actually gets hit versus sitting unfilled while the market moves away. Mid-price fills are the single most common way a backtest manufactures edge that doesn't exist, because the effect compounds with trade frequency — a strategy that trades often looks great on mid-price fills and mediocre-to-negative once it pays the spread on every round trip. Zero slippage Slippage is the gap between the price your signal fired at and the price your order actually executed at, and it's not just a queuing artifact — it's partly information. If your strategy is buying because something changed, other participants are reacting to the same thing, and the price you wanted is often gone by the time your order reaches the book. A backtest with zero slippage is quietly assuming the market waits for you. Unlimited size at the touch Backtests routinely assume you can execute your full position size at the best bid or ask, no matter how large the order is relative to the visible size there. In practice, a large order walks the book, and the average fill price is worse than the touch price by an amount that depends on how thin the book is. This one is invisible until you try to size up, which is exactly when a strategy that looked fine in testing starts bleeding. Commissions omitted or averaged Commissions and fees are usually small per trade and therefore easy to skip or fold in

Most hackathons ask you to build whatever you want. Dogfood 2026 does the opposite. Everyone builds the same thing: a submission and judging platform for hackathons. The challenge is simple: Build the platform that will judge you. And there is a reason this is more interesting than it sounds. Hackathon Raptors has run 35 hackathons across 85+ countries since 2023. They have seen the same problems appear again and again: registrations, teams, submissions, judge assignments, scoring, normalization, results, certificates, and exports all becoming separate pieces of an increasingly messy workflow. Now they want to build the platform they actually wish they had. That is what Dogfood is about. About the Hackathon Dogfood 2026 is a 72-hour online hackathon organized by Hackathon Raptors . The event runs from September 25 to September 28, 2026 . At a glance 🌍 Online and global ⏳ 72 hours 💰 $2,500 prize pool 👥 Solo or teams of up to 4 💸 Free to participate 🔓 Open source 🐳 Self-hosted 🛠️ Build with the stack of your choice But this is not a normal platform-building challenge. The winning project is intended to be forked, self-hosted, and used for actual Hackathon Raptors events. So instead of building a demo that gets abandoned after the weekend, you are building something that could become real infrastructure. Why Build Another Hackathon Platform? Hackathon platforms already have most of the features organizers expect. Registration. Team formation. Project submissions. Public galleries. Judge scoring. Community voting. Organizer dashboards. CSV exports. So what is missing? The difficult part is not building another CRUD application. The difficult part is making the entire system reliable when real people start using it. Consider judging. Two judges can look at the same project and give completely different scores. One might give almost everything a 4 or 5. Another might rarely give anything above a 3. Simply averaging those scores can produce a ranking that reflects the judg

Disclosure up front: Mnemoverse publishes this post, and Mnemoverse is one of the seven tools on it, so read every row knowing the author holds a position. With that on the table, the honest answer to the question in the title has not changed all year: there is no single best AI agent memory in 2026. There is a best answer to one prior question, and it decides more than any feature list: how much of your application should the memory system own? This post turns that question into a decision map. The deep, dated per-system read lives in Mem0 vs Zep vs Letta vs Cognee vs Supermemory ; head-to-head pages live on the comparison hub . TL;DR No single best exists. The boundary question (how much of the app the memory system owns) sorts the field faster than any benchmark. Seven systems, seven different jobs: embeddable SDK, temporal fact graph, self-editing runtime, ingestion pipeline, managed context engine, framework primitive, cross-tool managed memory. A tool chosen by ranking gets replaced; a tool chosen by job stays. Every claim here was checked against the vendors' public pages in July and August 2026, and these products change fast: verify against their own docs before you commit. The decision map The boundary question is the one-sentence filter this map runs on: how much of your application should the memory system own? Answer it first, and most of the table collapses to one or two rows. Your job Start with The cost you accept Embed an open-source memory SDK inside one application you fully own Mem0 You wire it into each app yourself; Apache-2.0 self-hosting is real Track facts that change over time, with valid-from and valid-to history Zep You operate Graphiti with a Neo4j backend, or take the managed cloud Build an agent that curates and edits its own memory as first-class behavior Letta You adopt a full runtime from the MemGPT line, not just a memory API Turn documents and data sources into a queryable knowledge graph Cognee Pipeline thinking: Extract, Cognify

The Ubiquitous Infinite Scroll Pagination Bug Almost every Flutter engineer has encountered the dreaded infinite scroll race condition in production. The user opens a list, flings their thumb down the screen on a spotty cellular connection, and triggers multiple scroll notifications past the bottom threshold within milliseconds. Before the first asynchronous HTTP network request finishes, the scroll listener fires again. Suddenly, your list duplicates items, page counters jump ahead, or the state machine locks up entirely. Recently, mobile developer Ali Wajdan published a widely discussed article titled 3 Lines of Dart async* Code That Fixed My Infinite Scroll Pagination . In his article, Ali accurately diagnoses the root cause of standard pagination headaches: "Most Flutter pagination code I have seen, including my own for years, wraps a mutable state object around a scroll listener. A page counter, a loading boolean, a hasMore flag, and a fetch method the UI calls when it hits the scroll threshold. It works until two scroll events fire close together, or a rebuild triggers a second load before the first future resolves... It is a classic race condition, and it gets worse once the state lives across a page counter, a hasMore flag, and a loading flag that all need to stay in sync." To escape this trap, Ali suggested encapsulating pagination logic inside a Dart async* generator and consuming it with a StreamIterator : // The pattern proposed in Ali Wajdan's article Stream < List < Post >> fetchPostsPaginated ( String query ) async * { var page = 0 ; var hasMore = true ; while ( hasMore ) { final batch = await api . fetchPosts ( query , page: page ); hasMore = batch . isNotEmpty ; page ++ ; yield batch ; } } final iterator = StreamIterator ( fetchPostsPaginated ( query )); Future < List < Post >> loadNextPage () async { if ( ! await iterator . moveNext ()) return const []; return iterator . current ; } On the surface, moving mutable state into local generator variable

The long-rumored deal will give the chip giant access to—and help it promote—a huge repository of open-source AI models and data sets.

How to Handle Anti-Bot Measures When Taking Screenshots Programmatically You send a request. The page loads. The screenshot comes back blank, or shows a CAPTCHA, or captures a "Please verify you're human" wall. This is one of the most common problems when building any screenshot pipeline. Here's what's actually happening and how to deal with it. Why headless browsers get flagged Bot detection works by looking for patterns that differ from real users. Headless Chrome has several tells: navigator.webdriver returns true by default Missing Chrome-specific properties like window.chrome Inconsistent screen dimensions (no monitor attached means no GPU info) Mouse events fire at pixel-perfect coordinates with no jitter Font fingerprints differ from headed browsers Modern detection services (Cloudflare, Akamai, Datadome) look for combinations of these signals, not individual flags. Spoofing one without the others often makes the fingerprint more suspicious, not less. The practical spectrum of detection Most sites fall into one of three categories: No active detection — a basic bot check via User-Agent string at most. Simple fix: set a realistic UA. Passive fingerprinting — loads a detection script, collects signals, blocks on second or third visit. You'll see this on news sites, e-commerce, media platforms. Active challenges — Cloudflare Turnstile, hCaptcha, reCAPTCHA v3 score-based. These require real interaction or a solving service. Know which category your target falls into before spending time on it. Fixes that work for most cases 1. Use a stealth plugin For Playwright, playwright-extra with puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth patches the most common fingerprinting vectors: npm install playwright-extra puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth import { chromium } from 'playwright-extra'; import StealthPlugin from 'puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth'; chromium.use(StealthPlugin()); const browser = await chromium.launch(); This handles navigator.webdriver , window.chrome , and several other

Ever wondered what's happening right now on a beach in Mexico, in Red Square, or at a harbor in Norway? I run Cam-World — a free live webcam aggregator that pulls together 7,000+ public streams from 100+ countries into one searchable place. No registration, no paywall. Here's a tour of what's inside and a few things I learned along the way. 🗺 The world map is the product The heart of the site is a dark globe where every green dot is a live camera. Click a cluster, zoom into a city, open a stream — you never leave the map. Watching it for a while teaches you something: the planet has a rhythm. Webcams go online with the morning sun, and the "online" wave rolls west around the clock. 📊 Honest uptime — you can tell a dead cam from a live one Aggregators usually show you a thumbnail and pray. We check every camera automatically and show a statistics widget: the last 24 hours and 30 days as color-coded slots (online / outage / offline / no data) plus an uptime percentage. The lesson here: webcams are ephemeral. Streams die, hotels turn off cameras, storms break them. Honest stats became our most-loved feature — users check reliability before clicking play. 🔎 Search, cities, collections Search works by name, city, country and tags. There are dedicated hubs for countries and cities, and themed collections: beaches, traffic, mountains, northern lights. 🌙 Small things that matter Dark & light themes (night couch-travel vs daytime browsing), 20 interface languages, "Near me" sorting by distance, live online/offline badges on every card. Try it 🗺 World map — pick a dot, watch live 🔎 Search — find a place you love 🏠 Home feed — a rotating mix of live cameras It's free, works on mobile, and there's always something happening somewhere. What would you check first — a beach, a mountain, or your own hometown square? 👇

Full interview-prep notes, ##Episode 1 through 29. Episode 1 : Execution Context ============================== Everything in JS happens inside the execution context. Imagine a sealed-off container inside which JS runs. It is an abstract concept that hold info about the env. within the current code is being executed. In the container the first component is memory component and the 2nd one is code component Memory component has all the variables and functions in key value pairs. It is also called Variable environment. Code component is the place where code is executed one line at a time. It is also called the Thread of Execution. JS is a synchronous, single-threaded language Synchronous:- In a specific synchronous order. Single-threaded:- One command at a time. Episode 2 : How JS is executed & Call Stack ============================================= When a JS program is ran, a global execution context is created. The execution context is created in two phases. Memory creation phase - JS will allocate memory to variables and functions. Code execution phase Let's consider the below example and its code execution steps: var n = 2 ; function square ( num ) { var ans = num * num ; return ans ; } var square2 = square ( n ); var square4 = square ( 4 ); The very first thing which JS does is memory creation phase, so it goes to line one of above code snippet, and allocates a memory space for variable 'n' and then goes to line two, and allocates a memory space for function 'square'. When allocating memory for n it stores 'undefined', a special value for 'n'. For 'square', it stores the whole code of the function inside its memory space. Then, as square2 and square4 are variables as well, it allocates memory and stores 'undefined' for them, and this is the end of first phase i.e. memory creation phase. Now, in 2nd phase i.e. code execution phase, it starts going through the whole code line by line. As it encounters var n = 2 , it assigns 2 to 'n'. Until now, the value of 'n' wa

The problem I'm a heavy sleeper. Not "hit snooze once" heavy. I would turn off three stacked alarms in my sleep and wake up an hour late with zero memory of doing it. The problem was never hearing the alarm. It was that turning it off had become a reflex I could do half-asleep, from bed, without ever really waking up. So I built Mornio. The idea Mornio moves the off switch away from the bed. You pick a QR code or a household barcode (the back of a cereal box, a sticker on the bathroom mirror, the label on your coffee tin) and place it across the room. When the alarm goes off, the only way to stop it is to physically get up, walk over, and scan that exact code with your phone. If you try to silence it without scanning, the alarm comes back. And a few minutes after you scan, Mornio runs a second stay-awake check, because getting out of bed once doesn't mean you won't faceplant back into it. How it's built AlarmKit (iOS 26) for scheduling and the reliable, system-level ringing. This was the big unlock: a normal third-party app can't reliably ring like a real alarm, and AlarmKit finally makes that possible. The camera for scanning the QR code or barcode, matched against the specific code you registered the night before. Everything stays on-device. No account, no ads. The codes you pick never leave your phone. What I learned The hard part wasn't the scanning, it was trust. An alarm has exactly one job, and if it fails once, you delete it forever. Most of the work went into making the ringing bulletproof and making the "I dismissed it without really scanning" edge cases impossible to game while half-asleep. Try it, or tell me I'm wrong It's live on the App Store (iPhone, iOS 26.1+): https://apps.apple.com/app/id6780983853 Site: https://mornioapp.com I'd love feedback from other heavy sleepers or shift workers: Does scan-to-dismiss sound like it would actually get you up, or annoying enough you'd rage-delete it? If you've tried it: was the first-morning setup (placing a co

Dynamic rendering in Angular sounds like a fairly narrow technical problem: “I don't know which component I need until runtime.” Angular already gives us several good tools for that. But there is a big difference between dynamically choosing a component and dynamically constructing an entire UI from a runtime specification. And that difference becomes especially important with Server-Driven UI and Generative UI. 1. ngComponentOutlet : when the problem is really just component selection For simple cases Angular already gives us: <ng-container *ngComponentOutlet= "componentType" /> This works very well when the application already knows its possible components and runtime logic only decides which one to display. componentType = condition ? UserCardComponent : AdminCardComponent ; The advantages are obvious: very little infrastructure, normal Angular lifecycle, AOT-compatible components and a relatively declarative template. But this approach starts becoming uncomfortable when the runtime input is no longer: UserCardComponent and instead becomes: { "type" : "Card" , "children" : [ { "type" : "Input" , "props" : { "label" : "Name" } } ] } Now we are no longer selecting a component. We are interpreting a UI description. 2. ViewContainerRef.createComponent() : more control, more responsibility Angular also allows components to be instantiated programmatically: const ref = viewContainerRef . createComponent ( componentType ); ref . setInput ( ' label ' , ' Name ' ); This is a powerful primitive. We control where the component is created, which component is used, how inputs are assigned and when the component is destroyed. For relatively contained dynamic behavior, this can be exactly what we need. But once a runtime specification controls many components, application code often starts evolving into something like: switch ( node . type ) { case ' input ' : ... case ' select ' : ... case ' button ' : ... case ' dialog ' : ... } Then we add input mapping. Then events. Then ne

There is a strange contradiction happening in software engineering right now. A lot of developers are worried that AI is going to make them obsolete. At the same time, the people building the most capable AI coding tools are demonstrating something that should probably make us rethink what being a software engineer actually means. I don't think the future is one where nobody understands software anymore. I think it is one where writing the software becomes dramatically cheaper. And if that happens, the thing that makes an engineer valuable has to move. That is what I mean by career safety. Career safety isn't about making yourself impossible to replace. It is about making your value portable. We've always resisted giving up the code Developers have a long history of being suspicious of abstractions that take work away from us. We went from machine code to assembly, from assembly to higher-level languages, from manually managing memory to garbage collection, from building everything ourselves to libraries and frameworks, and from text editors to IDEs. We even had entire categories of tools, such as CASE tools, designed to automate parts of software development. And every time, there was resistance. Because programmers don't just use code. We build our identities around it. John Carmack captured this unusually well when he wrote: “Coding” was never the source of value, and people shouldn’t get overly attached to it. — John Carmack He followed that with the more important point: Problem solving is the core skill. — John Carmack That is a difficult idea for developers to internalize because coding is tangible. You can point at the repository. You can point at the pull request. You can count the commits. You can say, "I wrote this." But the business doesn't ultimately pay you for the number of lines you wrote. It pays you for what those lines accomplish. The business never really bought the code A company doesn't wake up in the morning thinking: "We need 14,000 more line

Moving a Next.js app off Vercel and onto a plain Ubuntu VPS usually starts with a painful realization: either your serverless functions are timing out on background jobs, or your client just handed you a strict "you must host this on our infrastructure" requirement. Deploying the app itself is easy. What trips people up (and what cost me hours of debugging and locking myself out of my own server) is everything around the app. Here are the 12 things that actually break when you leave the serverless ecosystem, in the order you'll hit them. 1. Next.js needs a process manager, not just npm start Running npm start in a terminal dies the moment you disconnect. You need something that keeps the process alive, restarts it on crash, and survives a reboot. PM2 is the simplest option for a single-server Node deploy. npm install -g pm2 // ecosystem.config.js module . exports = { apps : [{ name : " my-app " , script : " node_modules/.bin/next " , args : " start " , cwd : " /var/www/my-app " , instances : 1 , exec_mode : " fork " , autorestart : true , max_memory_restart : " 512M " , env : { NODE_ENV : " production " , PORT : 3000 }, }], }; cd /var/www/my-app && pm2 start ecosystem.config.js pm2 save pm2 startup systemd -u YOUR_USER --hp /home/YOUR_USER That last line is the one people forget - without it, PM2's process list doesn't survive a server reboot. 2. Nginx needs to proxy to the port, not serve the files Next.js is not a static site (unless you've explicitly exported it as one). Nginx's job is to forward requests to the Node process, not serve files from disk: upstream nextjs_upstream { server 127.0.0.1 : 3000 ; keepalive 64 ; } server { listen 80 ; server_name example.com www.example.com ; location / { proxy_pass http://nextjs_upstream ; proxy_set_header Host $host ; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr ; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for ; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme ; # WebSocket support - required for HMR and any realtime f

Zoox is expanding to this critical ride-hailing destination a few weeks after it started charging for robotaxi rides.

Nvidia has agreed to buy Hugging Face for $12.93 billion, bringing one of the most popular hosting platforms for open-source AI models, datasets, and tools under the ownership of the world's biggest AI chipmaker. Hugging Face is an online platform founded in 2016 that gives AI developers a space to share their projects and data […]

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. Child-monitoring apps might need a reboot Digital harms have become the defining fear of American parents. In response, they’re increasingly turning to content-monitoring apps that scan their children’s texts, photos, emails,…

Using GPT-6 Astra, Playco built three themed game prototypes from one grey box foundation and reported 50% fewer manual fixes than with the previous model.

Legora used GPT-6 Astra to review 41 documents in minutes, find all four planted errors, and improve performance by nearly 40% in this financial-review workflow.

We're liveblogging Dyson's press conference at IFA 2026 because we love cleaning gadgets.

The DJI ROMO 2 lineup also includes LiDAR-enabled mopping arms and improved obstacle avoidance.