标签：#t

Recently, while working on an in-progress open-source framework called Projector, I ran into a (not particularly novel) issue: one of it's internal packages ( core ) had grown during this period, and was not nearly as flyweight as it needed to be in the browser. The result was 10-20kbs of unnecessary machinery getting pulled in. I noticed this while running examples. I was consistently hitting a wall in bundle sizes that was surprisingly difficult to get past, even for someone as stubborn and relentless as I am. Naturally, I turned to Claude and ChatGPT to help me with this, and ended up using ChatGPT 5.5 with Codex as I find that, with the "precise" output mode, it tends to be a little more honest than Opus 4.8 these days. I shared exported HAR network logs with it, having it go through the chunks to confirm where the bulk was; consistently, it confirmed that the issue was around an entangling of authoring/resolution code with runtime code in core that was pulling in too much to the browser. The technical details here aren't really important, but I'm using them to illustrate a larger point. We then iterated through a lot of different solutions—I setup a "goal" in codex with benchmarks to hit, and gave it a bunch of constraints, context, and tooling. Finally, after about 2-3 hours of looping against that goal, it completed. Looking through the git diff, I noticed something odd—it had duplicated the result of the resolved module, so it could skip the resolution machinery and thus drop it from the browser bundle (again, technical details not really relevant). It hit the rough kb benchmarks, respected all constraints, utilized all context and skills available, and avoided importing the machinery that we both aligned on being the core problem. It provided an elegant, coherent, well-written api, implemented a surgical, well-tested, well-designed solution, and convincingly defended its work when I queried about the implementation. That sounds great, right? In fact, I thin

Startup Baseten is reportedly close to finalizing a $1.5 billion round at a $13 billion as the “inference gold rush" marches on.

Every connected device on your desk, from a smart plug to a fitness band to a hobbyist ESP32 board, runs on a descendant of one tiny chip that was never meant to change the world. In 1971, Intel released the 4004, the first commercially available microprocessor. It was not built for computers, robots, or the internet. It was built to run a desk calculator. The story of how a calculator chip became the foundation of modern IoT is one of the most instructive in all of electronics. A calculator contract that got out of hand The 4004 began as a job for hire. A Japanese calculator company called Busicom approached Intel in 1969 wanting a set of custom chips for a new line of printing calculators. The original plan called for around a dozen separate, purpose-built integrated circuits, each wired to do one fixed task. It was the standard approach of the era: if you wanted a device to do something, you designed silicon that did exactly that and nothing else. Intel engineer Ted Hoff looked at the sprawling design and proposed something radical. Instead of a pile of single-purpose chips, why not build one general-purpose processor that could be told what to do through software? A program stored in memory could make the same chip behave like a calculator today and something else entirely tomorrow. Stanley Mazor helped shape the architecture, and a newly arrived engineer named Federico Faggin turned the concept into a working device, inventing the silicon-gate design techniques that made it physically possible. Masatoshi Shima, Busicom's representative, worked alongside them on the logic. 2,300 transistors that started everything When the 4004 was announced on November 15, 1971, it packed about 2,300 transistors onto a single sliver of silicon. By modern standards that is almost nothing; a current smartphone chip holds tens of billions. But the leap was not about raw count. It was about the idea. For the first time, a complete central processing unit existed on one chip that an

AI Observability for Lovable Apps: Monitor Prompts, Traces, and Evaluations with Currai Building AI applications has never been easier. Tools like Lovable allow developers and founders to create AI-powered products in minutes. Whether you're building a chatbot, AI assistant, recommendation engine, AI agent, or prediction app, generating the application is often the easy part. The real challenge starts after launch. How do you know what prompts are being sent to the model? How do you debug unexpected AI responses? How do you compare prompt variations and determine which performs better? How do you evaluate output quality over time? How do you track token usage and costs? This is exactly why we built Currai . What is Currai? Currai is an AI observability platform that helps teams understand, test, and improve AI applications in production. It provides: Prompt tracing AI request monitoring Session tracking Prompt versioning A/B testing LLM evaluations Cost and token analytics OpenTelemetry support Instead of guessing why your AI application produced a particular response, Currai lets you inspect the entire execution flow. The Problem With AI Applications Traditional monitoring tools were built for APIs, databases, and backend services. AI applications introduce a completely different set of challenges: Prompt changes can significantly impact output quality Model updates can affect behavior Hallucinations are difficult to track User conversations are hard to debug Prompt experiments are often unmanaged Quality evaluation is usually manual When something goes wrong, application logs alone don't provide enough visibility. You need observability designed specifically for AI systems. Trace Every AI Request Currai captures every prompt, model response, latency metric, token usage, and cost. You can inspect: System prompts User prompts Model outputs Execution traces Tool calls Metadata This makes debugging AI applications dramatically easier. Run Prompt A/B Tests Prompt engin

HiveTalk.space is a privacy focused chat app. HiveTalk.space should not be confused with hivetalk.org. While both platforms focus on communication, they are separate projects with different goals and feature sets. HiveTalk is closed source and cloud hosted, making it easy to start chatting without setting up your own server. Despite not being self-hosted, privacy remains a core focus. Private conversations are designed with privacy in mind, allowing users to communicate without unnecessary tracking or intrusive data collection. Every account includes generous free limits. Users can upload files and videos up to 1 GB each, send unlimited messages , and sign in using supported social login providers or a traditional account. Creating communities is simple, with the ability to make your own chat rooms for friends, gaming groups, project teams, schools, or fanbases in just a few clicks. HiveTalk also aims to provide a modern messaging experience with features such as polls, rich text formatting, media sharing, and room management tools, while keeping the interface simple and easy to use. Whether you want a private conversation, a small group chat, or a larger community, HiveTalk is designed to scale without placing artificial limits on everyday usage. Unlike many messaging platforms that reserve key features for paid subscriptions, HiveTalk offers its core functionality for free. The goal is to make private, feature-rich communication accessible without requiring users to pay just to unlock basic messaging features. As the platform continues to develop, new features and improvements are regularly added, with a focus on privacy, usability, and giving communities more control over how they communicate.

Anthropic still can’t distribute Claude Mythos or Fable 5 after running afoul of the Trump administration. But no one can say exactly what the company did wrong.

Draft, restructure & tighten wording from panel inside Word Discussion | Link

"We are reassigning most affected employees across existing opportunities and programs."

At its core, software development has always been about a simple cycle: Write > Review >...

The Snapchat maker is spinning off yet another internal unit. Dotmo will be comprised of current Snap staff who are leaving the social media company to focus on AI video development.

Valve has some good news and bad news about Steam Controllers. The good news: if you make a reservation for a Steam Controller, the company will now show you one of three estimates of when you'll be able to actually order your gamepad: by September 2026, by December 2026, or sometime in 2027. The bad […]

The $50 GB Operator is an accessory that lets you connect, play, and authenticate Game Boy, Game Boy Color, and Game Boy Advance cartridges on PCs and other devices. Now it's getting some new functionality for the Game Boy Camera. After turning the Game Boy Camera into a charmingly awful desktop webcam two years ago, […]

OpenAI is bulking up before its IPO, landing Transformer co-inventor Noam Shazeer from Google DeepMind and former Trump AI policy official Dean Ball in the same week.

A new system service will roll out this month ahead of big changes starting in September.

TechCrunch spoke to investors to find the hottest startups in the Spring 2026 YC batch. Some of them commanded valuations of over $175 million, VCs said.

Dads are traditionally tough to shop for—let me help with these handpicked gift ideas for fathers with great taste.

Rivian is being sued over the self-driving capabilities of its early vehicles, or lack thereof.

The vulnerability, disclosed 12 months ago, affects multiple manufacturers.

Let your agents read, send, and react to email autonomously Discussion | Link

Plaintiffs in the class action complaint allege Rivian falsely promised for years it would bring hands-free driving to its first-generation R1 vehicles.