标签：#t

Now that we have a mental model of how Solana works, it’s time to actually use it. We’ve talked about accounts holding state, programs containing the logic, instructions telling those programs what to do, and transactions bringing those instructions together. Creating an SPL Token Mint is a good place to see all of those concepts working together. In this part, we’ll create and initialize an SPL Token Mint on Solana Devnet, but more importantly, we’ll break down what is actually happening underneath the code. So, what exactly is a Mint? If I tell Solana to give someone 100 of a particular token, Solana first needs to know what that token is. What defines it? How divisible is it? How many units currently exist? Who has the authority to create more? That is where the Mint Account comes in. A Mint Account represents a particular type of token on Solana. It stores information about that token such as its current supply, decimals, mint authority and optional freeze authority. It does not store how many tokens I personally own. That belongs somewhere else, which we’ll get to when we talk about Token Accounts and ATAs. A simple way to separate the two is this: the Mint tells us what token exists, while a Token Account tells us how much of that token a particular owner holds. Before looking at any code, the complete process for creating our Mint looks like this: Connect to Solana Devnet Load our wallet Generate a new keypair for the Mint Calculate how much space a Mint Account needs Calculate the lamports required for the account Ask the System Program to create the account Ask the Token Program to initialize it as a Mint Put both instructions inside a transaction Sign the transaction Send and confirm it on Solana There are quite a few SDK functions involved when implementing this, but underneath all that syntax, this is really what the entire spl_init.ts file is doing. Starting with the wallet and Mint address We first load our wallet and turn it into a signer. The wallet

A TV isn't something you can throw into the trash once you're done with it. Here's what you should take into consideration before getting rid of that old panel.

A familiar production failure looks like this: an AI support agent reads a ticket, decides the customer deserves compensation, calls the refund tool, and refunds the full annual subscription instead of the $12 add-on. The model did not crash. The API did not throw an exception. The tool worked exactly as designed. The postmortem usually starts with the wrong question: “How do we stop the model from making bad decisions?” The better question is: which layer should have stopped the mistake before it became damage? AI agents fail in many different ways. They misunderstand intent. They create dangerous plans. They pass malformed arguments. They exceed permissions. They loop. They leak data. They take irreversible actions. Each failure mode belongs to a different layer, and each layer has a different job. If your only defense is a prompt that says, “Be careful,” you do not have a safety architecture. You have a hope. TL;DR: AI agent mistakes should not be stopped by the model alone. Use layered defense: intent classification stops wrong missions, plan validation stops forbidden sequences, tool schemas stop invalid arguments, authorization stops unauthorized actions, execution controls limit blast radius, output validation catches harmful results, runtime monitors stop loops, and human approval guards asymmetric risk. The best stopping layer is the earliest deterministic layer that can prevent harm, with the final brake closest to irreversible side effects. 📋 Table of Contents The Mistake Is Not One Failure Mode 1. The Prompt Layer Should Persuade, Not Enforce 2. The Intent Layer Should Catch the Wrong Mission 3. The Planning Layer Should Reject Forbidden Paths 4. The Tool Contract Layer Should Make Invalid Actions Unrepresentable 5. The Authorization Layer Should Veto Even Correct-Looking Actions 6. The Execution Layer Should Make Side Effects Boring 7. The Output Layer Should Catch Harmful Results Before They Ship 8. The Runtime Monitor Should Stop Slow-Motion Failures

This GIF shows what happens if you slightly stretch the data texture storing the BVH and triangle data. Child nodes storing triangles got misaligned addresses first, while AABB nodes lose them later.

Your team decides to add an AI agent to your Laravel application. The initial plan seems straightforward: give the LLM access to your existing REST API, let it figure out the endpoints, and watch it automate customer support. Then production happens. The agent calls GET /api/users and pulls 14,000 records into its context window, blowing past the token limit and costing $0.80 for a single turn. It tries to POST to a nested route, guesses the JSON payload wrong, and triggers a validation exception. Worse, it calls the refund endpoint without checking if the current user actually owns the order, because your API relies on middleware that the agent orchestrator bypassed. Building an API for human developers or frontend frameworks is fundamentally different from building an API for an AI agent. Humans read Swagger docs and write deterministic code. Agents read JSON schemas, reason probabilistically, and execute in a loop. If you just expose your Laravel routes to an LLM, you aren't building an agent. You're building a very expensive, highly unpredictable curl client. TL;DR: Turning a Laravel backend into an agent-ready system requires shifting from HTTP-centric controllers to action-centric tools. You must generate strict JSON schemas from PHP attributes, enforce authorization inside the tool boundary, curate outputs to protect the context window, handle failures without breaking the agentic loop, and offload execution to background queues. 📋 Table of Contents 1. Stop Exposing Routes, Start Exposing Actions 2. Generating Tool Schemas from PHP Attributes 3. The Authorization Gap: When Agents Bypass Policies 4. Taming the Context Window with Structured Tool Outputs 5. Surviving the "Infinite Retry" Loop on Flaky Tools 6. Building the Agentic Loop with Laravel Queues 7. Defending Against Tool-Output Prompt Injection 8. Observability: Tracing the Agent's Thought Process The Agent-Ready Backend Checklist 1. Stop Exposing Routes, Start Exposing Actions Scenario: You give an L

The agent did not fail because the model was stupid. It failed because a CRM tool returned a 502, the agent retried, created two support tickets, read a stale knowledge-base article, filled the context window with stack traces, and then told the customer everything was fine. When teams see this, the instinct is often to upgrade the model. But the same failure usually happens again, only with better prose. Most AI agent failures are not model failures. They are system failures: unclear objectives, weak tool contracts, missing budgets, excessive permissions, noisy context, no idempotency, no trajectory evaluation, and no sane recovery path. The model is only one component in a loop. The loop is the product. By 2026, models are much better at tool calling, structured output, and multi-step reasoning than they were a few years ago. That has made agents more practical, but it has not removed the engineering problem. If anything, more capable models make weak guardrails more dangerous, because the system looks competent for longer. TL;DR: AI agents usually fail because of the surrounding system, not the model. The common failure points are vague task contracts, weak tool schemas, excessive permissions, context rot, unbounded loops, non-idempotent tools, prompt-injection risk, missing trajectory evals, poor observability, and an obsession with autonomy over recovery. Reliable agents are built like careful distributed systems, not magic chatbots. 📋 Table of Contents The Model Is Not the System 1. The Agent Was Given a Goal, Not a Contract 2. Tool Schemas Are the Real Prompt 3. The Agent Has Access Before It Has Judgment 4. Context Rot Happens Before Model Degradation 5. Loops Fail When There Is No Budget or Circuit Breaker 6. Retries Turn Flaky Tools into Confident Lies 7. Prompt Injection Is an Architecture Problem 8. Nobody Evaluates the Trajectory 9. Observability Stops at the Final Answer 10. The System Optimizes for Autonomy Instead of Recovery A Practical Autonomy Che

The US government is investigating whether the Cybercab meets vehicle safety standards.

Roku's new free programming gives AI creators a platform for their productions. Whether the public will embrace it remains to be seen,

While Oura has largely dominated the smart ring market for years, a growing number of rivals are now racing to dethrone it by trying all sorts of approaches to get an edge over it.

Andy Holloway cohosts the Fantasy Footballers podcast with his friends Jason Moore and Mike Wright. The show is one of the premier fantasy sports podcasts, netting over 2 million monthly listeners and numerous awards, including Best Sports Podcast from iHeartRadio and People's Choice at the Podcast Awards four years in a row. Holloway's goal has […]

It's a concept device, sure, but there's something intriguing about Acer's handheld gaming PC and laptop 2-in-1.

During Naomi Osaka's match against Anastasia Zakharova at this year's US Open earlier this week, a gaggle of ring light-wielding influencers who were packed in a luxury suite became enough of a distraction that the umpire paused the match and repeatedly asked them to quiet down. Elsewhere in the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis […]

GitHub热门项目 | The open-source observability database. One columnar engine for metrics, logs, and traces, on object storage. | Stars: 6,625 | 11 stars today | 语言: Rust

GitHub热门项目 | Personal AI Toolbox | Stars: 1,377 | 19 stars today | 语言: Rust

GitHub热门项目 | | Stars: 4,187 | 6 stars today | 语言: TypeScript

GitHub热门项目 | A list of tools that are open-source, in-browser, and require no-signups! | Stars: 2,671 | 50 stars today | 语言: TypeScript

GitHub热门项目 | 🤗 The largest hub of ready-to-use datasets for AI models with fast, easy-to-use and efficient data manipulation tools | Stars: 21,899 | 5 stars today | 语言: Python

GitHub热门项目 | High-Quality Voice Cloning TTS for 600+ Languages | Stars: 9,811 | 83 stars today | 语言: Python

GitHub热门项目 | | Stars: 2,487 | 1,141 stars today | 语言: TypeScript

By Michael Nocito , data analyst · Published August 9, 2026 By the end of this page you can add an extension to a dashboard, tell the two hosting kinds apart, and read the permission box well enough to know what you're agreeing to. You'll also know the one behavior that surprises people after publishing, which is what an extension looks like in a PDF. It's about twelve minutes. Here's what to do before you add your first one. Find out where it runs. An extension you drop onto a dashboard is a web application, and some of them are hosted on Tableau-managed servers while others are hosted by whoever built them. That single fact decides how much thought the rest of the decision needs. The short version: an extension is a third-party web application running inside a dashboard object, and one of the two permission levels gives it your full underlying data along with table and field names. Where the code actually runs is the thing the panel doesn't show you, so it gets the picture. The original carries a diagram here. In words: A large rectangle labeled your dashboard contains four panels that all look alike. Three of them are shaded the same and marked as ordinary views. The fourth, in the lower right and outlined in a warning color, is labeled extension. A line runs from that fourth panel, crosses the boundary of the dashboard rectangle, and continues out to a separate box drawn outside and to the right labeled third-party host. The three ordinary views have no lines leaving the rectangle. The drawing shows that the extension panel sits inside the dashboard visually while its code and its data traffic reach outside it, which the other three panels never do. 1. What an extension actually is Before the explanation: you drop an extension onto a dashboard and it draws a chart type Tableau doesn't have. Where did that chart come from? From a web application, written by somebody else, running inside a panel on your dashboard. Tableau's own description is that extensions "let