标签：#p

submitted by /u/lelanthran [link] [留言]

Google has shared details of its fleet wide large scale A/B experimentation system designed to standardize experiment assignment, exposure logging, and configuration propagation across distributed services. The approach enables consistent measurement across products, reduces experiment conflicts, and improves reliability of data driven decision making at scale. By Leela Kumili

The Dreame L20 Ultra isn’t the company’s newest model, but it’s still a great robovac / mop hybrid that offers strong performance while requiring very little day-to-day maintenance thanks to its included trash bin and AI obstacle avoidance. Verge readers can get for its best-ever price right now. Originally $1,400 when it launched in 2023, […]

A context-efficient CLI coding agent built by agents Discussion | Link

submitted by /u/Pink401k [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/TryallAllombria [link] [留言]

Your Mac talks back when you plug things in Discussion | Link

The app allows users to engage with other fans, explore trending videos, and access curated creator feeds.

At Microsoft's annual Build conference on Tuesday, the company announced a slew of new or expanded AI initiatives, including a super app, in-house reasoning models, a cybersecurity tool, and OpenClaw-esque AI agents. All this news added up to a clear message: Microsoft is positioned to be one of the biggest players in AI, and it's […]

This open-source community project lets you create a StumbleUpon-like experience for recommending your favorite sites.

WhatsApp will charge businesses for using its AI agent based on token usage

Microsoft has two new Surface devices arriving later this year, both powered by Nvidia's RTX Spark chips. I got a chance to take a closer look at both the Surface Laptop Ultra and Surface RTX Spark Dev Box at Microsoft's Build conference this week, and while both have the same chip inside, they're utilizing Nvidia's […]

GPT-Rosalind advances life sciences research with enhanced biological reasoning, medicinal chemistry expertise, genomics analysis, and experimental workflow capabilities.

The Series F round values Coralogix at $1.6 billion and comes less than a year after its previous raise.

Plex has come a long way from being just a personal media server. Over the past few years, it has transformed into a streaming hub, today featuring ad-supported content and movie rental options. Now, the company is setting its sights on competing with social networking platforms like Reddit and Letterboxd: on Wednesday, Plex unveiled several […]

Hi — I'm E Lion (Eric), Hawaii-based builder at Coral Crown Solutions . I ship production code on my own domains—not tutorials: elionmusic.com — 400+ promo pages, vinyl-style player UX, Vapi phone agent + OpenAI "Shine" chat (one knowledge base, unified CSV log, webhook follow-up emails) prayerauthority.com — faith-tech at scale; WebM flying angels , SOAP journal, oracle tools Digital Zion — Three.js metaverse + native 3D desk fork + localhost bridge APIs Stack: PHP 8, vanilla JS, webhooks, JSON-LD / Search Console, ElevenLabs, Playwright, Electron (Shine assistant), Cursor pair-programming. Looking for: peers who respect hard integration work (SMTP, CORS, cPanel, webhook auth) and clients who need a real AI front desk or artist/ministry platform. Live demos: coralcrownsolutions.com · elionmusic.com Happy to give honest feedback on your builds—drop a link.

The Setup I run a Proxmox 9 homelab (pve-manager/9.0.5, kernel 6.14.8-2-pve) and I needed to run Docker inside an LXC container — not a VM — to test a customer-style "bring-your-own-VPS" deployment path for a PaaS I'm building. The container had to act like a standard Ubuntu cloud VM: Docker, systemd, the works. LXC over a full VM gets me near-bare-metal performance, a fraction of the RAM overhead, and instant boots. The catch: the "Docker on LXC" recipes you'll find on most blog posts and Proxmox forum threads are out of date . They assume kernel 5.x and runc 1.1.x. On a modern Proxmox (kernel 6.14 + runc 1.2+ shipped with Docker 29) those recipes fail in two new and confusing ways before you even reach the workarounds we used to know about. This article walks through exactly what fails, why it fails, and the config that actually works in 2026 — plus an honest look at the security tradeoffs, because spoiler: the working config is privileged , and that matters. The Goal A Proxmox LXC container that can: Run docker run hello-world cleanly Pull and build complex images (multi-stage builds, overlay2 storage driver) Run nested containers with their own systemd Use systemd --user for per-service lingering processes Attempt 1: Unprivileged LXC (the path you "should" take) Conventional wisdom says: use unprivileged LXC. The container's root is mapped to an unprivileged UID on the host (typically 100000 ), so even a full container compromise can't escape to host root. Modern Proxmox makes this the default and recommended mode. I started with an unprivileged Ubuntu 25.04 container, added the now-standard features: pct set <vmid> -features nesting = 1,keyctl = 1,fuse = 1 Then inside the container, installed Docker from the official download.docker.com repo and ran: docker run --rm hello-world Here's what happened: docker: Error response from daemon: failed to create task for container: failed to create shim task: OCI runtime create failed: runc create failed: unable to start

Metrics and analytical models are a double-edged sword. They make complex systems easier to compare, automate, and reason about. But once a metric becomes important, people start optimizing for it. Not for the reality behind it. For the number itself. This is Goodhart’s law in practice: when a measure becomes a target, it stops being a good measure. submitted by /u/Sad-Interaction2478 [link] [留言]

React + Mapbox GL JS: Custom Markers, Popups, and Bounds-Based Data Fetching If you've added a Mapbox map in a React app before, you've probably hit a wall pretty quickly: Mapbox GL JS manages its own DOM, and React manages a virtual DOM, and getting the two to play nicely takes some thought. Markers and popups are a great example of this tension — they're imperative APIs in a world where you want declarative components. This post walks through a pattern I've landed on for wrapping mapboxgl.Marker and mapboxgl.Popup in composable React components, and combining them with bounds-based data fetching to build something like a real estate or earthquake explorer map — where the data on the map updates as you pan and zoom. Here's what we'll cover: Wrapping mapboxgl.Marker in a React component that handles its own lifecycle Using createPortal to render custom marker content in React Fetching data from an API using the map's current bounding box Tracking an active marker with React state Wrapping mapboxgl.Popup in a component If you want to see the finished product first, the source code is on GitHub . The Core Challenge: Two DOMs Before we get into the code, it's worth understanding why this requires a pattern at all. When you use React's normal component tree, React controls the DOM. But mapboxgl.Marker also creates and manages DOM nodes — it places an element on the map at a specific geographic coordinate, handles repositioning as you pan, and removes itself cleanly when you're done with it. The approach here is to use React to manage the lifecycle of each marker (mount when data arrives, unmount when data goes away), while letting Mapbox handle the positioning . We use React's createPortal to render JSX content into a DOM node that we hand off to Mapbox. The example discussed below is a map that fetches earthquake data for the current viewport, displaying a custom Marker and Popup for each. As you move the map and the bounds change, new data is fetched and the Markers a

What is an LLM evaluation harness? A deep dive into lm-eval-harness You fine-tuned a 7B model. It aced your smoke tests, your colleague ran a few prompts and shrugged approvingly, and the README is now full of cherry-picked outputs that look great in a screenshot. Then someone asks: how good is it, really? — and you realize you have no number to point at. No MMLU score. No HellaSwag. Nothing reproducible, nothing you can defend in a PR review, nothing you can compare to last week's checkpoint. That's the gap an evaluation harness fills. It turns "vibes-based evaluation" into something with a score, a stderr, and a config file you can re-run next Tuesday. Why evaluate LLMs at all? Two reasons that actually matter: Comparability. If you can't put a number on a model, you can't compare it to anything else — not the previous checkpoint, not the open-source baseline, not the commercial API you're trying to replace. Leaderboards are noisy and gaming-prone, but a local leaderboard with the tasks you care about is one of the most useful artifacts a team can build. Regression detection. Most model regressions are silent. A 0.3-point drop on MMLU won't show up in a chat session, but it will show up in CI. People who ship models for a living treat evals the way backend engineers treat unit tests: mandatory, run on every PR, and blocking on regressions. You don't need a hundred benchmarks. You need the three to five tasks that map to your actual use case , plus one or two general capability anchors (MMLU, HellaSwag) so you can sanity-check that you didn't accidentally destroy basic reasoning while you were tuning for your domain. What is an "evaluation harness"? An evaluation harness is the software that sits between a model and a benchmark. It handles the boring-but-critical parts: loading the model weights, tokenizing prompts in the way the benchmark expects, running inference, extracting the answer from a longer generation, scoring it against a ground-truth key, aggregating