标签：#p

React + Mapbox GL JS: Custom Markers, Popups, and Bounds-Based Data Fetching If you've added a Mapbox map in a React app before, you've probably hit a wall pretty quickly: Mapbox GL JS manages its own DOM, and React manages a virtual DOM, and getting the two to play nicely takes some thought. Markers and popups are a great example of this tension — they're imperative APIs in a world where you want declarative components. This post walks through a pattern I've landed on for wrapping mapboxgl.Marker and mapboxgl.Popup in composable React components, and combining them with bounds-based data fetching to build something like a real estate or earthquake explorer map — where the data on the map updates as you pan and zoom. Here's what we'll cover: Wrapping mapboxgl.Marker in a React component that handles its own lifecycle Using createPortal to render custom marker content in React Fetching data from an API using the map's current bounding box Tracking an active marker with React state Wrapping mapboxgl.Popup in a component If you want to see the finished product first, the source code is on GitHub . The Core Challenge: Two DOMs Before we get into the code, it's worth understanding why this requires a pattern at all. When you use React's normal component tree, React controls the DOM. But mapboxgl.Marker also creates and manages DOM nodes — it places an element on the map at a specific geographic coordinate, handles repositioning as you pan, and removes itself cleanly when you're done with it. The approach here is to use React to manage the lifecycle of each marker (mount when data arrives, unmount when data goes away), while letting Mapbox handle the positioning . We use React's createPortal to render JSX content into a DOM node that we hand off to Mapbox. The example discussed below is a map that fetches earthquake data for the current viewport, displaying a custom Marker and Popup for each. As you move the map and the bounds change, new data is fetched and the Markers a

What is an LLM evaluation harness? A deep dive into lm-eval-harness You fine-tuned a 7B model. It aced your smoke tests, your colleague ran a few prompts and shrugged approvingly, and the README is now full of cherry-picked outputs that look great in a screenshot. Then someone asks: how good is it, really? — and you realize you have no number to point at. No MMLU score. No HellaSwag. Nothing reproducible, nothing you can defend in a PR review, nothing you can compare to last week's checkpoint. That's the gap an evaluation harness fills. It turns "vibes-based evaluation" into something with a score, a stderr, and a config file you can re-run next Tuesday. Why evaluate LLMs at all? Two reasons that actually matter: Comparability. If you can't put a number on a model, you can't compare it to anything else — not the previous checkpoint, not the open-source baseline, not the commercial API you're trying to replace. Leaderboards are noisy and gaming-prone, but a local leaderboard with the tasks you care about is one of the most useful artifacts a team can build. Regression detection. Most model regressions are silent. A 0.3-point drop on MMLU won't show up in a chat session, but it will show up in CI. People who ship models for a living treat evals the way backend engineers treat unit tests: mandatory, run on every PR, and blocking on regressions. You don't need a hundred benchmarks. You need the three to five tasks that map to your actual use case , plus one or two general capability anchors (MMLU, HellaSwag) so you can sanity-check that you didn't accidentally destroy basic reasoning while you were tuning for your domain. What is an "evaluation harness"? An evaluation harness is the software that sits between a model and a benchmark. It handles the boring-but-critical parts: loading the model weights, tokenizing prompts in the way the benchmark expects, running inference, extracting the answer from a longer generation, scoring it against a ground-truth key, aggregating

Join me in this deep dive where I'll explain all the code changes and tricks that took me from the reference implementation which processes the billion records in 4+ minutes, to processing everything in under 2 seconds. Who knew Java could be this fast? submitted by /u/goto-con [link] [留言]

Swap debugging war stories\n\nI have been living in webhook + PHP + email land (Vapi, OpenAI, PHPMailer, CSV logs).\n\nDrop your stack in a comment (even one line). I will reply with the first three places I would look for a silent production failure.\n\nNo sales pitch — trying to meet dev friends who ship unglamorous integration work.\n\nMy builds: elionmusic.com · prayerauthority.com

Stop shipping a 1990s C library to compute planets. Xalen is the pure-Rust, Apache-2.0 replacement for Swiss Ephemeris. If your app does astrology, you already know the dependency. Swiss Ephemeris: a C library from the 1990s, a folder of binary .se1 data files you have to ship and locate at runtime, and a license that is either AGPL or you pay for a commercial seat. For 30 years it was the only serious option, so everyone just swallowed the cost. That era is over. Xalen Ephemeris is a full planetary engine written in pure Rust, with no unsafe in the core engine (the only unsafe lives in the optional FFI, Node and WASM binding crates), released under Apache-2.0. No C toolchain. No data files to ship. No copyleft clause waiting for the day you try to make money. It is built to replace Swiss Ephemeris in production, not to admire it from a distance. Python is live on PyPI and the Rust crates are live on crates.io: # Python pip install xalen # Rust cargo add xalen-ephem xalen-time xalen-ayanamsa xalen-vedic Node and WASM build straight from the repo. Repo: https://github.com/vedika-io/xalen-ephemeris Switching takes one line Xalen ships a pyswisseph-shaped API on purpose. Migrating an existing codebase is a find-and-replace: # before import swisseph as swe # after import xalen.swe as swe jd = swe . julday ( 1990 , 6 , 15 , 10.5 ) xx , ok = swe . calc_ut ( jd , swe . SUN , swe . FLG_SWIEPH | swe . FLG_SPEED ) # same argument order, same SE_/SEFLG_/SIDM_ constants, same tuple layout Your function calls do not change. Your data-file directory disappears. Your license problem disappears. Xalen vs Swiss Ephemeris Line them up and the gap is hard to miss. Swiss Ephemeris is C from the 1990s, shipped as a native library you compile and link, fed by .se1 data files you have to bundle and locate at runtime, under AGPL or a paid commercial license. Xalen is pure Rust with no unsafe in the core engine, thread-safe, with no native dependency and no data files for the analytical eng

A little hand on your Mac Discussion | Link

Collaborative voice API for agents Discussion | Link

submitted by /u/f311a [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/ReasonableLoss6814 [link] [留言]

Smart lighting company Nanoleaf has been acquired by OneRobotics, the parent company of SwitchBot. In an exclusive interview with The Verge, Nanoleaf CEO Gimmy Chu says the company will remain independent and that he and his cofounder and COO, Christian Yan, will continue to run it. "Nothing is changing operationally," says Chu, adding that there […]

submitted by /u/jrdi_ [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/r_retrohacking_mod2 [link] [留言]

Fight the scourge of unsolicited rings and pings from spammers, scammers, and telemarketers.

When they're being eaten, bean plants release chemicals that draw in parasitic wasps.

Sepehr Khosravi discusses the evolution of developer productivity tools. Evaluating the strengths of tools like Cursor and Claude Code, he explains actionable techniques for senior engineers - including context engineering, custom rules, and Model Context Protocol (MCP) integrations. He shares real-world benchmarks and strategic frameworks for balancing AI adoption with clean code quality. By Sepehr Khosravi

Researchers are using machine learning algorithms to decrypt historical pencil-and-paper ciphers.

The company’s RTX Spark chips might finally turn the “AI PC” into reality.

How your front fork and rear shock work, so you can hurt less and have more fun.

Turn your iPhone into a free Mac controller Discussion | Link

Fusion startup Xcimer fired up the world's largest privately owned laser.