标签：#p

These bird feeders come with cameras and connected apps to let you see and learn about the birds in your neighborhood.

The indie marketplace for Blender artists and creators Discussion | Link

The affordable Artline doubles as a design piece and comes close to outshining the reigning champion of art TVs, the Samsung Frame Pro.

A decade ago, commuter buses attracted big protests in San Francisco. Years later, the city is still feeling the repercussions.

In 2019, Alex Vindman testified during President Trump’s first impeachment trial–a decision that ended his military career. Now he wants to challenge the president from the halls of Congress.

As adoption of AI agents looks set to surge by as much as 300% in the next two years, leadership teams are carefully considering the implications of a hybrid human-AI workforce. Unlike existing enterprise-level automation that relies on manual input, AI agents are capable of autonomously coordinating complex tasks, interacting with multiple tools and environments across…

submitted by /u/andersmurphy [link] [留言]

New research finds that in the six months after Meta relaxed rules in the name of free speech, violent threats against lawmakers—including President Donald Trump—surged on Facebook.

On Tuesday, the Seattle City Council will vote on whether to enact a one-year moratorium on new data centers - just two months after several companies proposed building five large-scale centers in the city. Among the moratorium's fiercest supporters are current employees from the city's biggest tech giant, Amazon, who joined others to testify in […]

The outspoken longevity scientist David Sinclair has been predicting that one day, you’ll go to the doctor and get a prescription that will make you 10 years younger. Now MIT Technology Review has learned that he has plans to launch human tests of an oral “reprogramming” drug as part of a $101 million competition organized…

AI coding agents feel sharp when a project is small. They can scan a few files, understand the shape, and make useful changes. In that phase, the project still fits inside the agent’s short-term memory. The architecture is obvious. The dangerous files are nearby. The blast radius is small. But something changes when a project reaches MVP size. The agent still sounds confident, but it starts guessing. It finds a nearby file and assumes it is the right one. It trusts stale documentation. It misses hidden callers. It forgets architecture boundaries. It edits something that was not really part of the task. I kept running into that problem while building larger projects. Source-level guardrails help. A CONTRIBUTING.md, AGENTS.md, or project instruction file can tell the agent how to behave. But those are still instructions. They are not facts. That is where the idea for CodeMeridian came from. What CodeMeridian is CodeMeridian is a local code knowledge graph for AI coding tools. It indexes a codebase into Neo4j and exposes that graph through MCP, so tools like GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, Codex-style agents, or other MCP-compatible clients can ask better questions before editing. The basic idea is: The assistant is the AI. CodeMeridian is the project map. It does not replace the coding assistant. It gives the assistant a structured way to ask about the codebase. Examples: What calls this method? What tests cover this area? What files are likely in scope for this feature? Is the graph stale before I trust it? How is this frontend component connected to backend code? Why a graph? Code is already a graph. Methods call methods. Classes implement interfaces. Tests cover production paths. Frontend components call API clients. API handlers touch services. Services use repositories. Docs mention symbols. Projects depend on other projects. A normal file search can find text. A graph can answer relationship questions. That matters because many AI coding mistakes are relationship m

Hey, welcome back. Last time we talked about missing parameterization in test scenarios. Today's mistake is similar in spirit. The test runs. The numbers look great. But what you've built isn't a load test. It's a hammer. ⚠️ The script works. The test is inhuman. Real users don't fire requests like a machine gun. They log in. They pause. They read. They click. They pause again. A typical user journey that takes 60 seconds in real life? Without think time, your script does it in just a few seconds. What this breaks Your throughput numbers are fiction. If users complete journeys 30x faster than reality, your RPS is inflated by 30x. You're not measuring capacity — you're measuring endurance under abuse. You stress the wrong things. Realistic concurrency surfaces real bottlenecks. A firehose of instant requests just overloads your connection pool and calls it a day. Production behaves nothing like your test. Because real users think. Your script didn't. 🛠 The fix Add randomized pauses between steps. Every major tool supports it: JMeter: Gaussian Random Timer, Uniform Random Timer etc. k6: sleep(Math.random() * 5 + 3) Gatling: pause(3.seconds, 8.seconds) Locust: time.sleep(random.uniform(3, 8)) 3–8 seconds between actions is a reasonable starting point. Check your analytics for what real sessions actually look like. Before your next run: Pauses between every major action? Randomized, not fixed? Does the timing feel human? If not — you're not testing load. You're testing collapse. Think time is one piece of the puzzle. But realistic load modeling goes deeper — it's about understanding how real users behave, how to translate that into a load profile, and how to design a test that actually reflects production. That's not something you patch with a timer. It's something you build from the ground up. If you want to understand the full system — from load model design to test execution to results that mean something — that's exactly what Performance Testing Fundamentals course

If you’ve ever built a slide-out cart drawer, a dynamic free-shipping bar, or custom analytics tracking for a Shopify store, you've run straight into this brick wall: Shopify themes do not emit consistent, trustworthy cart events. You write a perfect event listener, only to find out a third-party product-bundle app uses old-school XMLHttpRequest (XHR) instead of fetch to add items to the cart. Your listener misses it completely, the cart drawer stays shut, and your user thinks the button is broken. Most developers end up copying and pasting messy, brittle window.fetch overrides into their projects. Frustrated by solving this over and over again, I built Shopify Cart Broadcaster —a zero-dependency, 2 KB utility that intercepts both Fetch and XHR requests seamlessly to provide universal DOM events. 👉 Check out the source on GitHub: Rabin-p/shopify-cart-broadcast (If this saves you an afternoon of debugging, drop a ⭐!) The Nightmare of the /cart/add Response Even if you successfully listen to Shopify's /cart/add.js request, Shopify throws another curveball at you. When you add an item to the cart, the server responds with only the item(s) that were just added —not the updated state of the entire cart. If your slide-out cart drawer needs the new total price to see if a discount threshold is met, you are out of luck. You're forced to manually chain another fetch('/cart.js') request to get the true state. My utility handles this annoying race-condition out of the box. It detects the mutation type, intercepts it, pushes the true cart events to the window and displays it beautifully. window . addEventListener ( ' shopify:cart-updated ' , ( e ) => { // Always gives you the accurate, updated cart object! console . log ( ' New Cart Total: ' , e . detail . cart . total_price ); });

MacRumors has discovered a new and easier Genmoji creation experience in iOS 27.

🏆 This is a submission for the June Solstice Game Jam 🎯 What I Built Turing's Frequency is a browser-based rhythm game where you decrypt encrypted radio signals by listening to musical patterns and recreating them. Each signal carries a message from a historical figure who changed the world — voices that were silenced, ignored, or forgotten, now restored through your rhythm. 🎮 👉 PLAY THE GAME LIVE 👈 📖 The Story The game is set in 1954 , on the desk of Alan Turing at the University of Manchester. A radio crackles with fragmented transmissions — encrypted messages carrying words of Pride , resistance , and identity . You are a student who has found Turing's last notebook, and with it, the key to decrypting these signals. 🌅 The connection to the June solstice: As you decrypt each signal, the screen literally brightens — from near-darkness to a flood of golden light. The solstice is the moment light and dark trade places, and this game makes that transition tangible. 🎬 Video Demo 👆 Watch the full gameplay loop: title → story → rhythm gameplay → decrypted messages → victory screen with solstice light effect. 🕹️ How to Play Key Action 1 2 3 4 Play notes ↑ ↓ ← → Arrow keys (alternative) Space / Enter Advance screens 🎧 Listen to the signal pattern 🎹 Repeat the notes in order 🔓 Decrypt the message 🌅 Restore the voice 💻 The Code The entire game is a single HTML file (~32KB) with zero external dependencies . No frameworks, no libraries, no asset files — just HTML, CSS, and vanilla JavaScript. mamoor123 / turings-frequency Turing's Frequency - A Rhythm of Light. June Solstice Game Jam 2026 entry. ⚡ Key Technical Decisions 🔊 Web Audio API for all sound: Every tone is synthesized in real-time using oscillators. The game uses a pentatonic scale (C4, E4, G4, C5) so every combination of notes sounds pleasant. No audio files needed. function playTone ( freq , duration = 0.3 , type = ' sine ' , volume = 0.3 ) { const osc = audioCtx . createOscillator (); const gain = audioCtx . create

Cloud teams waste between 40% and 60% of their infrastructure budget on a false choice: committing to reserved capacity they won't fully use or chasing spot instance savings they can't. Introduction: The Cloud Cost Optimization Dilemma Cloud teams waste between 40% and 60% of their infrastructure budget on a false choice: committing to reserved capacity they won't fully use or chasing spot instance savings they can't operationalize. The decision between commitment discounts and spot instances is not a preference. It is a calculation with three variables: workload predictability, failure tolerance, and the operational cost of managing interruptions. Commitment discounts lock you into capacity for one or three years. You pay upfront or monthly for compute resources whether you use them or not. The mechanism is simple: cloud providers offer 30% to 72% discounts because they can forecast their own capacity planning when customers commit. You save money when your actual usage matches your commitment. You lose money when usage drops below the committed level because you still pay for idle capacity. Spot instances offer 70% to 90% discounts by selling unused cloud capacity at auction prices. The provider can reclaim these instances with 30 seconds to 2 minutes of notice. You save money when your workload can tolerate interruptions and you build automation to handle instance termination. You lose money when interruptions cause failed jobs that must restart from scratch, consuming more compute time than the discount saved. Most engineering teams pick one strategy and apply it everywhere. This creates two failure modes. Teams that over-commit pay for capacity during low-traffic periods. Teams that over-rely on spot instances spend engineering time rebuilding checkpoint systems and retry logic that costs more than the discount delivers. The correct approach is workload-specific. Measure your actual usage patterns for 30 days. Calculate the cost of interruption handling. Then a

Use this WIRED-exclusive coupon code to get the best deal on this high-design machine and biodegradable pods.

Hello, I'm Maneshwar. I'm building git-lrc, a Micro AI code reviewer that runs on every commit. It is...

Introduction Modern cloud-native systems generate an enormous amount of telemetry data every second. Applications, containers, Kubernetes clusters, APIs, databases, and infrastructure components continuously emit metrics, logs, and traces to help engineering teams understand system behavior and troubleshoot issues. While observability has become essential for operating distributed systems reliably, it has also introduced a new challenge: managing the scale, cost, and quality of telemetry. OpenTelemetry (OTel) has emerged as the industry standard for collecting and processing observability data. It provides a vendor-neutral framework for instrumenting applications and exporting telemetry to different observability backends. However, simply adopting OpenTelemetry is not enough. Without proper optimization strategies, organizations often face excessive telemetry ingestion costs, noisy dashboards, high-cardinality metrics, trace overload, and inefficient debugging workflows. This article explores practical approaches for optimizing observability using OpenTelemetry. It focuses on metrics, logs, and traces individually while also discussing broader optimization strategies across the telemetry pipeline. Understanding the OpenTelemetry observability pipeline OpenTelemetry provides a unified framework for generating, collecting, processing, and exporting telemetry data. At its core, the OTel ecosystem consists of SDKs, instrumentation libraries, collectors, processors, and exporters. Applications generate telemetry using OpenTelemetry SDKs or auto-instrumentation agents. This telemetry is then sent to the OpenTelemetry Collector, which acts as a centralized telemetry processing layer. The collector can receive telemetry from multiple sources, enrich it with metadata, apply filtering or sampling, and export it to one or more observability backends. The observability pipeline typically follows this flow: Application → OTel SDK → OTel Collector → Observability Backend The Open

In the hyper-competitive landscape of modern B2B outbound sales, speed-to-lead and outreach capacity are the ultimate drivers of pipeline volume . Yet, traditional Sales Development Representative (SDR) teams face a exhausting bottleneck: reaches and qualifications are limited by human bandwidth . A typical outbound SDR spends up to 80% of their day dialing numbers, navigating IVR phone trees, hitting voicemail, and dealing with incorrect contact records. When an inbound lead submits a form requesting a product demo, the average company takes 42 minutes to respond. By that time, prospect engagement has cooled by over 400%. To shatter this operational limit, modern revenue operations (RevOps) teams are transitioning from rigid auto-dialers and static voice bots to autonomous voice AI sales agents . By pairing the hyper-realistic conversational engine of ElevenLabs with the visual orchestration power of n8n , you can deploy a scalable, context-aware calling agent that handles inbound qualification and outbound follow-up calls in real-time. This technical blueprint provides an end-to-end guide to designing, securing, and deploying a production-grade Voice AI Sales Agent using ElevenLabs Conversational AI and n8n . We will cover how to manage conversation state, execute live database tool calls, secure webhook communication, route calls dynamically, and configure infrastructure to achieve sub-second response latency . The Architecture of an Enterprise Voice Agent Building a conversational voice agent requires a multi-layered system that operates in near real-time. When a human speaks over a telephony network, their voice must be digitized, transcribed, processed by a large language model (LLM), synthesized back into audio, and sent back down the line—all within a fraction of a second. To ensure stability, scalability, and absolute separation of concerns, our architecture decouples the telephony and voice generation layer from the logic and database integration layer . [