找到 12128 篇相关文章
GitHub热门项目 | 🚀 2026 最系统的 AI Agent 速成指南｜智能体实战教程 · 完整学习路径 + 实战项目 + 面试题库 · 对标大模型应用开发工程师岗位 · 覆盖LangChain / LangGraph / Coze / Dify / MCP / skills / LLM / RAG / 提示词 · 企业级部署与微调 · 从0到企业级落地 + 从学习到上线项目 + 面试准备一体化 | Stars: 3,439 | 43 stars today | 语言: Python
GitHub热门项目 | Agentic AI for writing code | Stars: 736 | 10 stars today | 语言: Python
GitHub热门项目 | ComfyUI template workflows | Stars: 710 | 9 stars today | 语言: Python
GitHub热门项目 | Give your agent a computer 👾 | Stars: 1,637 | 796 stars today | 语言: TypeScript
Small ask, on paper. A clinician types something like "any allergy conflicts for this patient's current meds?", and before the model answers it needs to actually go get the medication list and the allergy list rather than guess at what's plausible. Two functions, both of which already existed. The interesting part was never the lookups, it was getting a model to decide when to call them and hand back arguments I could trust. Then compliance sat in on the review and asked the question I should have seen coming: "what checks this model's answer?" Fair question, this is going in front of a clinician. Their answer was a second model, from a different provider, running the same lookups independently and flagging if it disagreed. Reasonable. Also, as it turned out, the thing that broke my code. The first version worked. That was the problem. I had the OpenAI SDK already wired into this project, so version one was straightforward: define tools , send the request, read message.tool_calls , run whichever function it asked for, push a role: "tool" message back with the result, loop until it stops asking. Twenty minutes, maybe. It worked on the first real test and I remember thinking this was going to be a short ticket. It was a short ticket, right up until "second model, different provider" landed in the same sprint. I went to point the exact same loop at Claude and it just doesn't speak that dialect - Anthropic sends tool requests back as tool_use blocks sitting inside the message content, not a separate tool_calls array, and the result has to go back as a tool_result block inside a user message. There's no tool role at all on their side. Same idea, completely different shape, and I was about two minutes from just writing a second version of the loop and calling it a day. I'd already installed the thing that fixes this I only stopped because I already had @aviasole/shapecraft in this project for the FHIR schema work, and figured it was worth thirty seconds to check whether g
An AI coding agent isn't autocomplete. It runs shell commands, reads your files, installs packages, and opens things you never pointed it at. That's the whole reason to have one. It's also why I don't start projects the way I used to. Nothing dramatic happened to me, by the way. I'm not writing this from the wreckage of a dropped production table. I'm writing it because I spent an afternoon going through what could plausibly go wrong, expecting a long list of hard problems, and instead found that most of it is handled by about ten minutes of config nobody mentions on day one. So here's the ten minutes. Prose isn't protection This is the bit that took me embarrassingly long to get. You can tell an agent things two ways. A rule is prose it reads and weighs - good for judgement calls like naming, style, when to stop and ask. A ban is a config entry that makes something impossible. The trap is using the first for the second job. Writing "never force-push" into a CLAUDE.md feels like a control. It isn't. It's a request sitting in a context window next to a few thousand other tokens, competing with whatever you actually asked for. It'll usually win. Usually is fine for naming conventions. It's not fine for git push --force . 1. The deny list .claude/settings.json : { "permissions" : { "deny" : [ "Bash(rm -rf:*)" , "Bash(git push --force:*)" , "Bash(git push -f:*)" , "Bash(git reset --hard:*)" , "Bash(psql*production*)" , "Bash(*DROP DATABASE*)" , "Bash(*DROP TABLE*)" , "Bash(*TRUNCATE*)" , "Read(./.env)" , "Read(./.env.local)" , "Read(./.env.*.local)" ] } } These don't run. Not "the agent is discouraged" - they don't run, including in the scenario the list exists for, which is you at midnight approving a plan you skimmed. Two things to know before you test it. It takes effect from the next session, not immediately. So you write the file, try the blocked command in the same session, watch it go through, and conclude the whole feature is broken. Restart first. Keep the .env
TL;DR: Grafana Agent reached End-of-Life on November 1, 2025 and has been replaced by Grafana Alloy. Alloy consolidates Agent's Static mode, Flow mode, and Kubernetes Operator into a single collector built on the OpenTelemetry Collector while maintaining native support for Prometheus and Loki. If you're using Flow mode, migration is relatively straightforward. If you're using Static mode, the migration process will involve reviewing and testing the converted configuration. Before switching over, verify relabeling rules, recheck resource usage, and confirm that Prometheus and Loki are receiving the same data and labels as before. If you're still running Promtail, it's worth migrating both to Alloy at the same time since Promtail is also End-of-Life. If you deployed Grafana Agent a couple of years ago, there's a good chance you haven't thought about it since. It quietly collects metrics, ships logs, and generally stays out of the way. What you may not realize is that Grafana Agent reached End-of-Life on November 1, 2025. That includes Static mode, Flow mode, and the Kubernetes Operator. Grafana Labs has stopped creating bug fixes, security patches, and official support. If you're still running it, your collection layer is probably still performing normally, but is now unsupported. That doesn't necessarily mean it will stop working tomorrow, plenty of unsupported software continues running for years. It does mean you're taking on the risk yourself, especially as the rest of your monitoring stack continues to evolve. This article covers why Grafana Labs replaced Agent with Alloy, what actually changes during the migration, and where people tend to run into problems. Why Grafana Agent was deprecated One of the biggest issues with Grafana Agent is that it was essentially three agents, not one product: Static mode, which used YAML and looked similar to Prometheus. Flow mode, which introduced a component-based configuration using River. The Kubernetes Operator, which manage
When a Go application needs on-chain and protocol-level data, the HTTP request itself is usually the easy part. The difficult work starts afterward: defining request models, decoding inconsistent payloads, respecting rate limits, recovering from transient failures, and deciding what to do when one part of a multi-metric query succeeds while another part does not. Those concerns can quietly turn a small integration into a maintenance burden. tokenterminal-go is an open-source, production-oriented Go SDK for Token Terminal API v2 that aims to remove that plumbing. The project supports all 24 documented API routes across Assets, Projects, Market Sectors, Metrics, and Datasets; it requires Go 1.21 or newer and uses only the Go standard library. 1 It is a focused choice for engineers building internal analytics services, data jobs, dashboards, research tooling, or any application that needs Token Terminal data without hand-rolling an HTTP client. The practical promise: keep the integration idiomatic and type-aware, while the client handles the failure modes that normally appear only after an application reaches real traffic. Why an SDK matters here Token Terminal’s API gives programmatic access to its data, but it requires an API key and an API-enabled plan. 2 That makes the client layer part of the application’s operational surface: it needs to handle credentials, request timeouts, rate limits, pagination or filtering parameters where relevant, and failures that should not crash a larger data pipeline. The library addresses these needs with a small, deliberate design. Its client methods take a context.Context , its response envelopes use generic Result[T] types, and its errors can be inspected with standard Go mechanisms such as errors.Is and errors.As . 1 In other words, callers can keep control of cancellation and business policy instead of receiving opaque, string-only errors. Capability What it means in practice Why it is useful Zero external dependencies The packag
TL;DR If you're a five-person startup shipping a Node.js API and you want a metrics dashboard by Friday, send your telemetry to a managed backend and keep only the instrumentation layer inside your own repo. The alternative — standing up a time-series database, an object store for long-term blocks, and a dashboard service — puts three more components on an on-call rotation that hasn't earned its first SLO yet. Settle the wire format now and treat the backend as a config line you can change later. I own the platform team's roadmap, which in practice means I'm the person who defends the monitoring bill in a budget review and also the person who gets paged when a disk fills at 03:00. Those two jobs pull in opposite directions, and most of the advice online is written by people who only hold one of them. Usually the pager wins the argument. Should a startup run its own metrics stack, or pay for a managed dashboard? Start with capacity, because that's the step everyone skips before signing anything. A moderately instrumented Node.js API — say 40 HTTP routes, two queue workers, default runtime and event-loop metrics, one latency histogram with ten buckets — sits somewhere around 3,000 to 8,000 active series per process. Multiply by replicas. Multiply again by every environment you keep alive, including the staging cluster nobody admits to. You are at 50k active series before a single engineer has written a custom counter, and a self-hosted scraper will chew through that on a 2 GB VM without noticing. It will still be fine at 500k. Past a few million active series you're into sharding, remote storage, and a retention argument with whoever pays for object storage — that's the point where the self-hosted route stops being free and turns into a project with a headcount attached. None of that work is hard. It's just never zero. Dimension Self-hosted stack Managed metrics backend Time to first dashboard 1–3 days under an hour Who owns retention you, plus the storage bill vendor
A few weeks ago I killed an indicator of mine in public. I had been trying to work out how much of my audience was automated. One signal was whether an account had uploaded its own avatar. It fired on 100% of the accounts I was confident were people and 97% of the ones I suspected were not. That isn't a lenient signal. It isn't separating anything — it tracks something both groups share, and I had been counting its votes for weeks. I wrote that up. Named the defect, retired the indicator, moved on feeling like I'd learned something. Three days later I shipped another one. The same hole, in a different shape I needed to check whether a comment on one of my posts was actually visible to readers — I'd found one the API returned and the comment count included, but that moderation had removed. So I wrote a check: // v1 — passes for anyone with a second comment on the page. Zero separation. visible : html . includes ( comment . user . username ) // v2 — the only witness with jurisdiction over one comment. visible : html . includes ( comment . id_code ) Two comments from the same account, one removed and one live, both came back visible under v1. I found it by accident, and only because I happened to compare against something else. Someone in a thread put the problem in a sentence I couldn't argue with: if the fix is "I noticed this one," the next indicator ships with the same blind spot in a different shape. Which is, word for word, what I had already written about the previous defect. Their prescription was structural. A labeled control set shouldn't be a diagnostic you run when something feels off. It should be a permanent seed every indicator has to clear a margin on before it's allowed to vote — not just beat chance on the live population, which is exactly the condition that let the avatar signal pass silently. Building it Twenty-eight accounts. Fourteen labeled human, fourteen automated, and every label carries a provenance string saying how it was established — seve
MacPaw is building a local version of its AI assistant Eney using Liquid AI's models.
Robinhood's latest financial instrument intends to let any retail investor feel like they, too, can make money by backing Y Combinator startups.
We tested coolers on camping trips, road trips, beach days, and at parties to bring you our favorite models for every situation. The Yeti Tundra Haul is our top pick.
submitted by /u/mareek [link] [留言]
TL;DR MCP servers are powerful, but they can provide access to production systems if...
MagSafe accessories make your phone feel uniquely yours. These are our favorites, including Android-friendly Qi2 picks.
submitted by /u/TheSwedeheart [link] [留言]
River plans to build a new factory, launch additional models from 2027, and target profitability as it scales production.
Make your product feed visible to AI shopping agents Discussion | Link
This affordable, portable projector doesn’t try to be a cinematic marvel, but it’s fun to use.