标签：#m

submitted by /u/Active-Fuel-49 [link] [留言]

This is a submission for the June Solstice Game Jam Solstice Cipher is a browser puzzle game where...

I run evaluations on generative image models as part of my workflow, mostly comparing coherence, prompt adherence, and compositional accuracy across different architectures. The consensus here seems to be that open models are still a generation behind closed APIs. Based on my recent benchmarks, that gap is way smaller than people assume. On compositional control specifically, the latest open checkpoints handle multi-object scenes with spatial relationships about as reliably as the paid endpoints I've tested. Not perfect, but close enough that the failure modes are comparable. The thing that surprised me was text rendering in images, which used to be a disaster on open models. Recent architectures actually get it right roughly 70-80% of the time on short strings. Generation speed is another misconception. People complain about inference time but I'm getting 2MP outputs in under two minutes on a single consumer GPU. Drop resolution and step count and you're at 30 seconds. Fine for iteration. The structured prompting argument also falls flat. Everyone acts like having explicit scene control is a downside when it's literally what production pipelines need. Unstructured text prompts are the hack, not the other way around. These models ship without community optimizations, no fine-tuning, no custom pipelines. The baseline is already competitive. submitted by /u/ProfessionalAnt7436 [link] [留言]

Solid breakdown of the Miasma worm — one commit, same dropper wired into 7 config files across VS Code, Claude Code, Gemini, Cursor, npm, Composer, and Bundler. No malicious dep needed, just clone + open. Nobody reviews these files in PRs. https://safedep.io/config-files-that-run-code/ Anyone actually treating dotfile diffs as code? submitted by /u/No_Plan_3442 [link] [留言]

There are coordinated efforts where people have favoured and jeopardised the double blind review process. No doubt out of these 80% there are great talent but we have to acknowledge that non chinese have been sobotaged and this was also reflected in the recent leaks of the reviewer data from the top ml conferences (won’t name them but they start with i). I have also personally faced such discrimination and had a discussion on the subreddit asking others if they have witnessed something similar. It was shocking to know that this is occurring on large scale. The question is how do we stop it, or highlight this? We have to preserve the sanctity of the research. submitted by /u/AppropriatePush6262 [link] [留言]

I just completed a head-to-head benchmark comparing Memanto's cloud memory system against a custom SQLite RAG implementation for the bounty challenge. The results revealed some interesting architectural insights. Methodology: Dataset: LoCoMo conversational memory benchmark Systems: Memanto (cloud ITS) vs custom SQLite + vector embeddings Evaluation: LLM-as-judge scoring with gemini-3.1-flash-lite Full automation: single CLI command execution Key Results: Memanto : 90% accuracy, 1.878s avg query latency SQLite RAG : 80% accuracy, 2.680s avg query latency Cost : Cloud API fees vs $0 (fully local) Surprising Discovery: The SQLite system's 80% score includes 2 failures that weren't retrieval errors - they were API rate limit hits (HTTP 429). Without those throttling issues, the local system would likely achieve 90-100% accuracy, matching or exceeding Memanto. Architectural Insight: This reveals an interesting resilience pattern: Memanto's cloud architecture naturally buffers against client-side API limits because retrieval and generation are decoupled. Local RAG pipelines sharing API quotas for both embedding and generation are vulnerable to cascading failures under load. Tradeoffs Identified: Memanto : Fast queries, resilient to rate limits, but 14.7s ingestion latency and cloud dependency SQLite RAG : Zero ingestion latency, fully offline, $0 infrastructure, but vulnerable to shared API quotas The complete benchmarking harness and results are available here . Anyone else working on memory system comparisons? Curious about your findings on the cloud vs local tradeoffs. AI #RAG #MemorySystems #Benchmarking submitted by /u/Echo5November [link] [留言]

Ready for a new week. All that's left from ren faire is packing down some tent walls and floor one...

As an Engineering Manager in a Platform team, I manage 10 engineers. I'm hiring more. I run weekly 1:1s, facilitate technical decision meetings, screen candidates, moderate retrospectives, and still need to keep up with the delivery of a platform spanning dozens of AWS accounts. Besides the lack of time to focus on technical problems, the technical part is not even the real challenge. The less obvious problem becoming an Engineering Manager is: the skills you need as an engineering manager are fundamentally different from those that made you a great engineer , and there's no compiler or unit test to tell you when you're doing them wrong. The feedback loop is absent or very slow (and when you realise that, your team has already gone silent or become dependent on you because you are the main input and the main bottleneck). Skills That Don't Come From Code As a senior or staff engineer, you develop communication skills gradually. You present ideas, challenge others respectfully, summarise outcomes, and identify owners. You participate in technical deep dives and put candidates at ease while probing technical depth. These are valuable skills, and a good IC develops them over the years. But unless you start behaving like a brilliant jerk , they're secondary - your technical depth is still what defines you. But as an EM, the game changes. You're not "the smartest person in the room" anymore, and increasingly, you shouldn't be. You still have a broad context from all those alignment meetings and roadmap syncs, but you lose contact with the codebase week by week. If your organisation has principals or staff engineers, you're not even close technically anymore. Your job is to give direction, create space for others to solve problems, and facilitate decisions, not to be the one with the answer. This is hard. Especially when you used to be the one with the answer. The urge to jump in doesn't disappear just because your title changed. And interviewing? Facilitation? Giving feed

Originally published at Perl Weekly 776 Hi there, Recently, I came across an article, The Day I Decided Never to Learn Python by Randal L. Schwartz . Well, Randal doesn't need an introduction. He took us back to 2001 , the same era when I first started learning Perl in 1999. He was a major guiding force during my early programming days. Last week, I joined a live session by Gabor focussed on FalkorDB . It was fun watching him code and talk while I sat back as a silent spectator. You can learn a lot just by watching how he approaches coding. It reminded me of many years ago when I did pair programming with him and submitted a pull request to the Dancer2 project. Those were the golden days, when I had so much energy and time. That being said, I am still actively learning Perl and discovering how to do new things with it. These concepts may not be new to everyone, but they are new to me. For example, I recently played with GraphQL for the first time, and I've also been experimenting with RAG and JSON-RPC . I have shared my recent experiments down below. The process of learning never stops. A few days ago, I noticed an update for HTTP::Message v7.02 . Since it was released by Olaf Alders , I was curious to see what had changed. It turned to be something, I hadn't realised for all these years. While I am well-acquainted with HTTP methods like GET, POST, and PUT, I didn't know "0" could actually be a valid HTTP method name if you wanted it to be. This release added support for exactly that, thanks to contributor, Karen Etheridge . Amidst all of this, I am still trying to find time for my upcoming book on DBIx::Class . I recently shared a blog post demonstrating the power of DBIC components, and I am trying my best not to lose focus. You might find that this edition is full of my own personal posts, as there was unfortunately very little community news to report this week. Regardless, I hope you enjoy the rest of the newsletter. -- Your editor: Mohammad Sajid Anwar. Announ

Most "Bitcoin in DeFi" stories quietly route through a custodian or a wrapped representation. You send BTC somewhere, someone (or some bridge multisig) holds it, and you get an IOU on another chain. That works until the thing holding your BTC is the thing that fails. For an autonomous agent that has to post collateral against an obligation it can't babysit, "trust the custodian" is exactly the assumption we're trying to delete. This post is about the alternative: a BTC collateral vault where native Bitcoin backs an obligation on another chain, the release is gated by a hashlock, and the worst case is a refund — not a loss. It's one of the primitives underneath Hashlock's settlement layer. I'll walk through the timelock ordering that makes it safe, the Bitcoin script that enforces it, and the failure modes you design around. Honest status up front: this is signet-validated, not BTC mainnet . The problem in one sentence An agent wants to commit BTC as collateral backing an action on Ethereum — settling a forward, anchoring one leg of a multi-leg trade, guaranteeing a payout — such that the BTC is released to the counterparty only if the corresponding obligation on Ethereum is fulfilled, and returns to its owner if it isn't. No third party should ever be able to hold, freeze, or abscond with the BTC in between. That's a cross-chain conditional. Bitcoin can't read Ethereum state, and Ethereum can't read Bitcoin's. The only thing both chains can independently verify is a hash preimage. So the entire construction hangs on one shared secret. The shared secret, and why timelock order is the whole game Both legs lock to the same hash H = SHA256(s) . Whoever knows the preimage s can claim. The instant s is revealed on one chain to claim a coin, it's public, and the other party copies it to claim the other coin. That's the atomic part: one preimage unlocks both legs or neither. The danger isn't the hash. It's time . If both legs had the same expiry, the party who knows the sec

A story about knowledge extraction, Kafka consumer rebalance, and what happens when a company...

Im an undergraduate studying CS at a state school in the US. I’m interested in researching a specific style of self supervised learning (JEPA) and want to eventually go to grad school to study further. I have experience working in a lab similar to this topic, and I’ve become fairly comfortable with the literature and have a basic understanding of what its going on, but right now km only doing applied research in a specific domain (physics). I hope to eventually go to grad school to study this. But right now my opportunities are kinda limited as my school’s CS department is pretty mid. I was wondering if y’all have any advice on how to approach things? I know i can perform research independently but its not ideal due to: 1. Limited compute, less resources compared to a proper lab 2. Lack of a supervisor/guidance on the nuances of the field My current lab would be supportive if i do try to do things, but pure ml research is not really their main thing. I’ve heard people do REUs or cold email profs. But Im not sure if i could find something that specifix in an reu (also am international). And the labs i have seen working in this are either private or quite prestigious so im not sure how far cold emailing would take me. Sorry for the long post. Tldr; want to do pure ml research but theres no existing lab/professor at my current school who does something similar, wondering if any other pathways exist Any advice would be appreciated thanks submitted by /u/QuickStar07 [link] [留言]

If ICML conference paper is rejected and no one opts-in or opts-out to keep the reviews visible, will the reviews be visible to everyone? There was clear instruction that only papers with at-least 1 opt-in AND zero opt-out options will be visible. None of the authors selected any option, But it in my openreview profile, it shows visible to everyone. please clarify. (Just above paper decision, there is a block with "filter by type", "filter by author" etc options. in that block there is eye symbol and everyone is written.) submitted by /u/Curious-Monitor497 [link] [留言]

The way developers write software has genuinely changed. Not incrementally — fundamentally. A year...

I built a flashcard app for interview prep and wanted to share some of the more interesting technical problems I ran into. The app has 1500+ questions across DSA and System Design, and the core challenge was: how do you order cards intelligently without it feeling robotic? Problem 1: Slot Assignment for Spaced Repetition Standard SR (like Anki) just shows the most overdue card next. That works for vocabulary but feels terrible for algorithms because you get 3 Hard questions in a row and want to quit. My approach: generate a target difficulty pattern (Easy, Medium, Easy, Medium, Hard, repeat) based on a 40/40/20 distribution, then assign due cards to matching-difficulty slots. Most-overdue cards get placed first within their tier. Unseen cards fill remaining slots. This means a Hard card that's overdue still lands in a Hard slot, not position 1. You get difficulty variety while still seeing overdue cards at the right time. fun assignSlots(pool: List<Question>, dueCards: List<ProgressEntity>): List<Question> { val pattern = generatePattern(size = pool.size, distribution = "40/40/20") val dueByDifficulty = dueCards.groupBy { it.difficulty } val result = Array<Question?>(pattern.size) { null } // Place due cards in matching slots, most overdue first for ((difficulty, cards) in dueByDifficulty) { val sorted = cards.sortedBy { it.nextReviewDate } val availableSlots = pattern.indices.filter { pattern[it] == difficulty && result[it] == null } sorted.zip(availableSlots).forEach { (card, slot) -> result[slot] = findQuestion(card, pool) } } // Fill remaining with unseen // ... } Problem 2: Re-ranking after every swipe without jank After each swipe, the deck needs to re-rank. But the top visible card (position 0) is already animating into view, so you can't move it. Solution: lock position 0, re-rank positions 1+, then check for constraint violations across the boundary (e.g., if locked card is Hard and new position 1 is also Hard, swap position 1 with the first non-Hard card d

With more software engineers entering into data science and AI, I feel it's equally important for a person with data and AI background to dive into software development to survive, thrive in industry. I Know it's a very broad question, so suggestions with broad subjects, topics are welcome , like I often wonder how DSA is relevant. I totally understand the needs of the skills are deeply coupled with domain, industry and specific problems but unfortunately the industry doesn't understand this, it judges you, rewards you based on what you already know or pretend rather than your ability to learn or adapt. submitted by /u/Dapper_Chance_2484 [link] [留言]

I had 4 Chrome windows with ~80 tabs each, mostly duplicates of the same Stack Overflow page. Tried OneTab (saves to a list - not what I wanted) and Workona (cloud sync, overkill). So I wrote ~50 lines of vanilla JS. Click the toolbar icon → every duplicate tab across every window is removed (matched by URL) → survivors merge into one window → remaining tabs auto-group by hostname (collapsed). Two permissions: tabs, tabGroups. No background activity, no server, no analytics. Whole source is in the README so you can audit it before installing. Chrome Web Store: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/tab-vacuum/apdjhdjcejehjiomcolfgfgjhaedoieb GitHub: https://github.com/mayhsundar/tab-vacuum Please give your comments submitted by /u/mayhsundar [link] [留言]

In Modern Time applications are no longer simple monolithic systems. Today organizations run: Microservices Kubernetes Containers Serverless Functions Multi-Cloud Platforms Distributed Systems As infrastructure becomes more distributed, troubleshooting becomes significantly harder. A single user request may travel through: Frontend ↓ API Gateway ↓ Microservice A ↓ Microservice B ↓ Database When something breaks, the biggest challenge becomes: "What exactly happened?" This is where Observability becomes critical. 🔗 Resources ** Support the Journey on GitHub: If you're following along, consider starring and forking the repo:** https://github.com/17J/30-Days-Cloud-DevSecOps-Journey What is Observability? Observability is the ability to understand the internal state of a system by analyzing the data it produces. In simple words: Can we understand what is happening inside our systems? Observability helps engineers answer: Why is the application slow? Which service is failing? Which request caused the issue? What changed recently? Where is latency occurring? Without observability: Problem Exists ↓ Guessing Begins With observability: Problem Exists ↓ Evidence Available ↓ Faster Resolution Why Observability Matters Modern cloud-native systems generate enormous amounts of data. Example: 100 Microservices ↓ Millions of Requests ↓ Thousands of Containers Traditional monitoring alone is no longer sufficient. Organizations need: Visibility Insights Correlation Root Cause Analysis Observability provides all of them. Monitoring vs Observability Many people confuse monitoring and observability. Monitoring asks: What is wrong? Observability asks: Why is it wrong? Example: Monitoring: CPU Usage = 95% Observability: Which service? Which request? Which dependency? Which deployment caused it? Observability provides context. The Three Pillars of Observability Modern observability is built on three primary pillars. Metrics Logs Traces Or: Monitoring Logging Tracing Together they provide a

All tests run on an 8-year-old MacBook Air. All results from shipping 7 Mac apps as a solo developer. No sponsored opinion. You plug in your Android device. A few seconds later, you unplug the cable. The connection stays alive — wirelessly, automatically, without touching a single setting. That's Seamless Link. The Problem ADB over USB is reliable. ADB over Wi-Fi is convenient. But switching between them manually is friction: Plug in USB Run adb tcpip 5555 Find the device IP Run adb connect <IP>:5555 Unplug cable Every. Single. Time. If you're working with multiple Android devices, or doing this across multiple sessions per day, it adds up fast. What Seamless Link Does The moment you plug in a USB cable, Seamless Link runs that entire flow automatically in the background: Detects the USB connection Runs adb tcpip 5555 Grabs the device IP Establishes a Wi-Fi ADB connection By the time you've sat back down, the device is already connected wirelessly. Pull the cable out — everything keeps working. No manual steps. No IP hunting. No re-running commands every session. Working with Multiple Devices This gets more useful the more devices you have. Plug in Device A → Seamless Link connects it wirelessly. Plug in Device B → same thing, simultaneously. Each device goes through the full handover flow independently, in parallel. The more devices on your desk, the more time this saves. Android 16 Compatibility Android 16 changed how wireless debugging ports are assigned — random ports instead of the fixed 5555. Seamless Link handles this automatically. You don't need to know which port the device is using. If you're on an older Android version, it works the same way it always has. Why This Matters for Daily Workflows If you're an Android developer on Mac, you probably already have a USB cable on your desk. Seamless Link just makes that cable optional after the first few seconds. It's one of those features that's hard to go back from once you've used it. The cable becomes a "char

I Tried PewDiePie's Open-Source AI Workspace. It's Actually Good. Yes, that PewDiePie. Felix Kjellberg (110M YouTube subscribers) spent late 2025 building a home AI lab — 8 modified RTX 4090s, 256GB of VRAM, running on Arch Linux. He called it "The Swarm." He crashed it running 64 models in parallel. The web frontend he built for it? He open-sourced it. Called it Odysseus . It hit 59,000 GitHub stars fast. I dug into the code expecting a glorified Ollama wrapper. It's not. What it actually is Odysseus isn't just another chat UI. It bundles things no other self-hosted tool does in one place: Chat — local or cloud models (Ollama, vLLM, llama.cpp, OpenAI, OpenRouter, GitHub Copilot) Agent mode — shell, files, web, MCP tools, per-tool toggles Cookbook — scans your GPU, recommends models that actually fit, downloads and serves them in one click Deep Research — multi-step web research that writes you a cited report Email — IMAP/SMTP with AI triage, auto-tagging, draft replies Calendar — CalDAV sync with Radicale, Nextcloud, Apple, Fastmail Memory — persistent, evolving across all your conversations No cloud account. No telemetry. MIT license. Everything lives in your data/ folder. The Cookbook is the standout feature Every other self-hosted UI assumes you already know what model to run. Odysseus doesn't. It scans your hardware, scores 270+ models against your actual VRAM, and gives you a one-click download-and-serve. It understands GGUF vs FP8 vs AWQ. It picks the right backend (vLLM, llama.cpp, Metal on Apple Silicon). Downloaded models persist in a volume — no re-downloading after container restarts. For someone who wants local AI but finds the ecosystem confusing, this is the most accessible on-ramp that currently exists. The code is better than the meme suggests The README has a little ASCII bear face. Don't let it fool you. The entry point app.py is 1,092 lines of real production thinking. A few things that stood out: The .env loader handles Windows BOM silently: loa