标签：#m

"We will likely have similar concerns and discussions when China fields its Starlink-like constellation."

Apple will reportedly refresh the iPad mini this fall and the rest of its iPad lineup in the first half of 2027.

submitted by /u/ldelossa [link] [留言]

Google said users can soon access their notebooks through AI Mode in Search.

With this new update, Google is expanding AI Mode beyond answering questions and into completing tasks across the apps they use regularly.

Companies coming to market are raising money at fastest pace this century.

You're paying $10 to $20 a month for Copilot. You don't have to. A 2024-era laptop can run a coding model good enough for autocomplete, refactors, and "explain this function" entirely offline. No API key, no telemetry, no per-token bill. Here's the exact 2026 setup I run on a 16GB machine. Why local in 2026 Two years ago, local coding models were a toy. The autocomplete was slow and the suggestions were noise. That changed. qwen2.5-coder and deepseek-coder-v2 are genuinely useful now, and the tooling caught up: Ollama serves them, Continue.dev wires them into your editor, and the whole thing runs on hardware you already own. The pitch is simple: Free. No subscription, no usage caps. Private. Your proprietary code never leaves the machine. This matters if you work on smart contracts or anything under NDA. Offline. Works on a plane, in a basement, behind a corporate firewall. The tradeoff is quality and latency. We'll be honest about both. Pick a model (and match it to your RAM) This is the decision that makes or breaks the experience. Pick a model your machine can actually hold in memory, or it spills to disk and crawls. # Fast, fits anywhere (8GB+) ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:1.5b # ~1.0GB ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:3b # ~1.9GB # The sweet spot for most laptops (16GB) ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:7b # ~4.7GB # Quality tier, needs headroom (32GB+ comfortable) ollama pull deepseek-coder-v2 # ~8.9GB (16b MoE) ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:14b # ~9.0GB ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:32b # ~20GB Rough rule: the model file size is the floor, then add a few GB for context and the OS. A 4.7GB model on a 16GB machine is comfortable. A 20GB model on the same machine is not. Model Size RAM I'd want Use it for qwen2.5-coder:1.5b 1.0GB 8GB Autocomplete, fast iteration qwen2.5-coder:7b 4.7GB 16GB Daily driver: chat, refactors, explain deepseek-coder-v2 8.9GB 32GB Harder reasoning, multi-file context qwen2.5-coder:32b 20GB 64GB Near-cloud quality, if you have the RAM deepseek-coder-v2 is a 16b m

Splatoon Raiders’ July 23rd launch day is almost here, so your window to preorder the physical version at a $10 discount is about to close. The digital version is $49.99, and so is the game on cartridge if you preorder at Walmart. Amazon previously honored the preorder discount, but it’s selling the game at full […]

DoorDash is opening a limited beta of dd-cli, a command-line tool that lets developers and AI agents search stores, build carts, and place orders from the terminal, marking another step toward software designed for AI agents instead of just humans.

When people think about data centers, they usually think about servers, GPUs, electricity, and AI. Very few people think about water. That realization is what led me to start building AquaStat . Why AquaStat? Modern data centers consume significant amounts of water for cooling. Depending on the technology, climate, and workload, water usage can vary dramatically from one facility to another. Finding reliable information about that usage, however, is often difficult. Some facilities voluntarily publish sustainability reports. Others release only limited information. In many cases, information is scattered across government documents, environmental reports, local news articles, permits, or community discussions. I wanted to build a platform that could organize this information into something developers, researchers, journalists, and the public could actually use. What AquaStat Is AquaStat is an API-first platform focused on collecting, organizing, and analyzing information related to data center water usage. The long-term vision includes: A developer-friendly REST API OpenAPI documentation API key management A desktop control center A command-line interface Historical tracking Source attribution for collected information Transparent methodologies A modern TypeScript ecosystem Rather than hiding calculations, I want AquaStat to explain where information comes from and how conclusions are reached whenever possible. Technical Goals I'm designing AquaStat around several principles: API First Everything should be accessible through documented APIs before being exposed through a graphical interface. Strong Documentation Documentation should be treated as part of the product, not an afterthought. Reproducible Calculations Whenever AquaStat estimates or derives values, the methodology should be understandable and repeatable. Modern Tooling The project uses a modern TypeScript stack with an emphasis on maintainability, testing, and developer experience. Challenges One of the b

Owen Flowers and Thalha Jubair, two members of the prolific Scattered Spider hacking group, pleaded guilty and were sentenced to five years and six months in jail for hacking London’s metropolitan transit system.

Welcome to Day 4! Today is all about clean architecture, dependency isolation, and modern Python tooling. You will learn how to structure your files, control execution flows, use modern tools like uv to manage virtual environments at lightning speed, and organize a codebase like a professional software engineer. 🚀 1. Modules & Packages 📦 Module: A single .py file containing variables, functions, or classes you want to reuse. Package: A directory of modules. __init__.py : Runs automatically when a package is imported, allowing you to expose a clean top-level API and hide internal folder nesting. Absolute Import: Imports specifying the full path from the project root ( from app.core import analyze ). Preferred by PEP 8 . Relative Import: Imports relative to the current file using dots ( from .utils import clean ). Single dot . is current folder; double dot .. is parent folder. A. Core Modules & Packages 🌱 Easy Starter Example Creating a basic module and importing it: # file: calculator.py (Our module) def add ( a , b ): return a + b # file: main.py (Importing our module) import calculator print ( calculator . add ( 5 , 3 )) # Output: 8 🏛️ Real-World Example: Database Package API Exposing internal package functions cleanly using __init__.py : # Project Layout: database/ ├── __init__.py ├── auth.py (defines login_user()) └── query.py (defines fetch_data()) # database/__init__.py # Expose functions relative to this folder so users don't need deep imports from .auth import login_user from .query import fetch_data # main.py # Clean absolute package import for the end-user from database import login_user , fetch_data login_user ( " admin " , " password123 " ) B. Built-In vs. Third-Party Modules Built-In: Included with Python out-of-the-box (e.g., os , sys , json ). Third-Party: Built by the community and installed from PyPI (e.g., requests , rich ). 🌱 Easy Starter Example import math # Built-in math operations print ( math . sqrt ( 25 )) # Output: 5.0 # import requests # Th

Your data warehouse has a table called orders . It has columns like amount , status , created_at , and customer_id . Now three people ask "What was Q1 revenue?" The analyst writes SELECT SUM(amount) FROM orders WHERE created_at BETWEEN '2026-01-01' AND '2026-03-31' . The data engineer adds WHERE status = 'completed' . Finance excludes refunds and trial conversions. Three queries, three numbers, one question. Nobody is wrong. They just defined "revenue" differently. Multiply this by every metric in your organization, every team that queries the warehouse, and every tool that displays a number. That's the problem. A semantic layer solves it by defining each metric once, in one place, and serving that definition to every consumer. What is a semantic layer? A semantic layer is a metadata layer between your data warehouse and every tool that queries it. It defines business metrics, maps them to SQL, and exposes them through APIs. Instead of every consumer writing its own query, they all reference the same definition. When someone asks for "revenue," the semantic layer knows that means: SUM ( CASE WHEN status != 'refunded' AND type != 'trial' THEN amount ELSE 0 END ) That definition lives in one place. Dashboards, APIs, AI agents, and ad-hoc queries all use it. Change the definition once and every consumer gets the updated calculation. No Slack thread asking "which number is right." No detective work tracing a wrong number back to a stale query in a notebook somewhere. The core components of a semantic layer: Metrics (measures). The numbers you aggregate: revenue, order count, average deal size. Each metric has a fixed SQL definition. Dimensions. The columns you filter and group by: date, status, category, region. Dimensions define the axes of analysis. Relationships (joins). How tables connect: orders belong to customers, products belong to categories. Defined once, reused by every query. Access rules. Who can see what. Row-level security, tenant isolation, role-based ac

Self-service BI was supposed to free the data team. Give everyone a BI tool, teach them to drag and drop, and they'll answer their own questions. The data team can stop building dashboards and focus on infrastructure. That's not what happened. What happened: everyone builds their own dashboards with their own metric definitions. Marketing's "active users" counts monthly logins. Product's "active users" counts weekly feature usage. Finance's "active users" counts paying customers. Three dashboards, three numbers, one term. The data team now spends their time reconciling conflicting metrics instead of building. Self-service BI without governed metrics is just self-service chaos. What is self-service BI? Self-service BI means non-technical users can query data, build visualizations, and generate reports without help from the data team. The tools (Metabase, Looker, Power BI, Tableau, Superset) provide drag-and-drop interfaces, visual query builders, and template libraries. The promise: democratize data access. Anyone can answer their own questions. The reality: it works for simple questions ("how many orders this week?") and breaks for anything requiring business logic ("what's our net revenue retention?"). Users either define metrics incorrectly or ask the data team anyway. The data team becomes a help desk for the self-service tool instead of a help desk for SQL. Where self-service BI goes wrong Metric sprawl Without a central definition, every self-service user creates their own version of key metrics. A company with 50 Metabase users might have 30 different "revenue" calculations saved across collections. Which one is right? The one that matches the board report. Which one matches the board report? Nobody knows without checking each one. The "someone who knows" bottleneck True self-service requires understanding the data model. Which table has revenue? What does status = 3 mean? Is the amount column in cents or dollars? Pre-tax or post-tax? Including shipping or exc

Your company has a KPI dashboard. It was built six months ago by someone who has since moved teams. It shows revenue, churn, and a few product metrics. It loads slowly. The numbers don't match what finance reports. Nobody trusts it, but everyone screenshots it for the Monday standup. This is the state of KPI dashboards at most companies. Not because the tools are bad, but because the approach is wrong. A dashboard is a static view of a dynamic system. The moment someone builds it, it starts drifting from reality. What is a KPI dashboard? A KPI (Key Performance Indicator) dashboard is a visual display of an organization's most important metrics. Revenue, customer count, churn rate, conversion rate, average order value, NPS. The metrics that tell you whether the business is healthy. Traditional KPI dashboards live in a BI tool: Power BI, Tableau, Looker, Metabase, Grafana. An analyst builds the dashboard, connects it to a data source, and shares a link. People visit the dashboard (or receive a scheduled screenshot) to check the numbers. The concept is sound. The execution breaks for predictable reasons. KPI dashboard examples Before diving into what's broken, here's what teams typically build: SaaS executive dashboard. MRR, ARR, net revenue retention, churn rate, new customers this month, average contract value. Updated daily. Viewed by the CEO and board. The numbers must match the finance team's report exactly. Product analytics dashboard. Daily active users, feature adoption rates, conversion funnel stages, time to value. Updated hourly. Viewed by product managers. Often the first dashboard built and the first to drift from reality. Customer health dashboard (B2B). Per-customer usage metrics, support ticket volume, NPS, renewal risk score. Updated daily. Viewed by customer success. In embedded analytics use cases, the customer sees this too. Engineering operations dashboard. API error rates, p95 latency, deployment frequency, uptime. Updated real-time. Viewed by eng

Exposing your data over MCP is the easy part. Designing a tool an agent uses well is the hard part. An agent can only use a tool it can read, so the work is shaping the tool for how the model calls it, not just for the human looking at the result. These are the techniques behind @bonnard/mcp-charts and the visualize tool. Discovery-first, so the agent stops guessing An agent that guesses your schema writes wrong queries. So the first tool the agent meets is a discovery tool. It calls visualize_read_me to load the chart options, the tool schema, and worked examples before it ever calls visualize , and an explore_schema tool to learn your tables and columns before it writes SQL. The agent reads, then acts. A small set of purpose-built tools The temptation is one tool per metric, or a single tool that takes arbitrary SQL and hopes. Both fail: too many tools blow the agent's attention budget; one firehose tool gives it no guardrails. Bonnard ships a small set, discover, query, visualize, each with a narrow, obvious job. The agent picks the right one because there are few of them and each does one thing. // a small, purpose-built set, not one tool per metric server . registerTool ( " explore_schema " , { /* list tables + columns */ }, listSchema ); addCharts ( server , { runSql }); // registers visualize_read_me + visualize Compact, honest responses A tool that returns 10,000 raw rows poisons the context window and the agent's next decision. Bonnard's responses are sized for a model to read: Row caps with a completeness flag. Results are capped and tagged partial or complete , so the agent knows whether it is looking at everything. Partial-result warnings. When results are capped, the response says so and tells the agent not to sum or average the visible rows, use a measure instead. Summaries over dumps. The chart comes back with a compact text summary the model can reason over, not just an image it cannot read. Errors that guide the next action A bare "error: invalid co

Most teams connecting AI agents to their data warehouse start with text-to-SQL. The agent generates SQL from natural language, runs it against the warehouse, and returns results. It works until it doesn't: hallucinated JOINs, inconsistent aggregations, no access control, no audit trail. There's a better approach. Define your business metrics in a semantic layer, expose them via MCP (Model Context Protocol), and let any AI agent query governed definitions instead of raw tables. Then add one tool so the agent can chart the result in Claude or ChatGPT. This tutorial shows how to set it up in under 30 minutes. Why does text-to-SQL break in production? The agent sees column names but not business logic. It doesn't know that your company excludes refunds from revenue. It doesn't know that status = 'completed' means something different in orders than in subscriptions . It doesn't know that marketing and finance defined "active user" differently three years ago and never reconciled. So the agent writes plausible SQL and returns plausible numbers. Ask the same question twice with different phrasing and you get different answers. Ask two different agents and you get two different numbers. Neither matches the number your finance team reports. Beyond consistency, there's no row-level security. No multi-tenancy. No audit trail showing which agent queried what, when, and for whom. In production, with real customers, that's a non-starter. Text-to-SQL gives you speed. It doesn't give you trust. What is the semantic layer approach? Instead of letting agents write arbitrary SQL, define your metrics once in YAML: cubes, measures, dimensions, access rules. Then expose those definitions via MCP so agents query governed metrics, not raw tables. The difference: every agent gets the same answer because the metric definition is fixed. total_revenue isn't a column the agent interprets. It's a pre-defined calculation with agreed-upon filters and aggregations. When your finance team updates th

The iPad Mini could get an OLED display upgrade as soon as October, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. It would be the most significant refresh for the Mini since its 2021 redesign. An OLED iPad Mini has been rumored for months now, with Gurman previously reporting last year that it will also come with a […]

Drawing on more than a decade spent helping build some of the world's most influential AI systems, including research that later informed the development of ChatGPT, Andrew Dai explains why he believes visual AI is one of the next major frontiers in artificial intelligence.

NTSB findings back Elon Musk's claim that driver manually overrode FSD.