标签:#ha
找到 12413 篇相关文章
Georgia family says they're forced to sell home to power AI data centers
Satellite Tracker – Live Map of Starlink and 30k Satellites
What will be left for us to work on?
Building Food Metadata with LLM Juries
Boom? If AI Sales in the US Go South, Let's Not Bail Out Big Money Bettors
Is x86 ready to ACE it?
The Economics of Recursive Self-Improvement [pdf]
MorphoHDL: A minimalistic language for growing circuits
SCOTUS slip opinion: Grabbing Google geofence Location History is a 4th A search
A Trip to 90s Kansai: Exploring the XD FirstClass Network BBS
Show HN: MemStitch – Zero-copy context bridging for vLLM (25x TTFT speedup)
Distributed Development
ESBMC-Arduino: Closing the Deployment Gap for Formal Verification
The Git history command deserves more attention
Why Your Prompts Fail (And How to Fix Them)
Here is a reliable test: find a prompt that isn't working. Read it carefully. Now ask yourself — at which specific sentence did the model get permission to do what it did wrong? You will almost always find it. A hedged instruction. A missing constraint. An ambiguous scope. The model did not misunderstand you — it followed the most statistically probable interpretation of what you wrote. That interpretation was not the one you intended. These are not beginner mistakes. They are structural patterns that reappear at every experience level, because they look reasonable when you write them and only reveal themselves in the output. TL;DR: Prompts fail because they hand interpretive control to the model on dimensions where you had a specific requirement. Each of the seven mistakes below is a different way of doing that — and each has a specific, testable fix. Mistake 1: Placing Critical Instructions in the Middle of the Prompt Language models process all tokens simultaneously through attention mechanisms , but the effective weight any individual token receives depends heavily on its position. Instructions near the beginning and end of a prompt receive disproportionately more attention weight than those in the middle. This is not a quirk — it is a consequence of how positional embeddings interact with self-attention across long contexts. This effect is well-documented. The "Lost in the Middle" study (Stanford / UC Berkeley, 2023) showed that retrieval accuracy from long-context windows degrades significantly for information placed in the middle — even in capable models. The same mechanism applies to instruction prompts: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet both exhibit measurably lower constraint adherence for instructions buried mid-context compared to those at the leading or trailing position. Open-weight models including DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3 display the same positional bias — this is not a proprietary model quirk, it is a structural property of the transformer architecture. T
LAPD Regularly Pulled over Innocent People Plate Readers Flagged Cars as Stolen
What did SFFA vs. Harvard reveal about admissions?
Success may not matter if you aren't doing what you love
Show HN: Microphone – Talk out your side-project ideas, then test them with ads
If you are an aspiring founder, any VC will ask you this question: “why are you the only person who could solve this”. If you want to generate passive income with your side idea, get ready to enter a crowded market as everyone and their mother is shipping. Unless you have an active X account or you’re a TikTok sensation distribution is going to be tough. I just launched the trie.dev microphone beta to help folks find their edge. You yap into your phone about your ideas; Trie turns the rambling i