标签：#dev

Two CI workers kick off at the same moment. Both sign up a test user, both poll the shared QA Gmail account for "the" verification email, and worker #7 grabs the message that belonged to worker #12. The test passes. The wrong test. You spend an afternoon staring at a green build that should've been red. Shared inboxes are the single biggest source of flakiness in email-dependent E2E tests, and every workaround — catch-all forwarding rules, label rules scoped per PR, OAuth tokens living on the runner — adds another moving part that breaks on its own schedule. The fix is structural: every test gets its own address, on infrastructure your suite provisions and destroys. One wildcard, infinite addresses The E2E email testing recipe sets this up with one CLI command: nylas inbound create e2e You get back an inbox ID and a wildcard pattern shaped like e2e-*@yourapp.nylas.email . From there, each test mints a unique address under the wildcard — e2e-<uuid>@yourapp.nylas.email — and there's nothing to provision per address. You don't pay or configure per address either; the wildcard is just a convention, so burn UUIDs freely. Mail flows through MX records hosted on the Nylas side, which means zero DNS work in your own zone (the tradeoff: addresses live under *.nylas.email ). The Playwright fixture is two pieces — an address minter and a poller: export const test = base . extend < Fixtures > ({ testEmail : async ({}, use ) => { await use ( `e2e- ${ randomUUID ()} @yourapp.nylas.email` ); }, pollInbox : async ({ testEmail }, use ) => { const poll = async ( timeoutMs = 30 _000 ) => { const deadline = Date . now () + timeoutMs ; while ( Date . now () < deadline ) { const out = execSync ( `nylas inbound messages ${ process . env . INBOX_ID } --json --limit 50` , ). toString (); const match = JSON . parse ( out ). find (( m ) => m . to . some (( t ) => t . email === testEmail ), ); if ( match ) return match ; await new Promise (( r ) => setTimeout ( r , 1500 )); } throw new Error (

Ever stared at a physical examination report and felt like you were reading ancient hieroglyphics? "Elevated Serum Triglycerides"? "Hypoechoic nodule"? The immediate urge is to Google it, only to be convinced by WebMD that you have three days to live. In the world of AI Agents and Healthcare Automation , we can do better. Today, we are building an AI Physician Assistant using the AutoGPT protocol. This isn't just a chatbot; it’s an autonomous agent capable of parsing complex medical data, searching verified medical encyclopedias via SerpApi , and even cross-referencing hospital schedules to suggest the right department for a follow-up. By leveraging the OpenAI API and Pydantic for structured data validation, we are moving from "chatting" to "doing." If you're looking for more production-ready patterns or advanced AI implementation strategies in healthcare, definitely check out the deep-dive articles at * WellAlly Tech Blog * . The Architecture: How the Agent "Thinks" Unlike a standard LLM call, an autonomous agent operates in a loop: Perception -> Reasoning -> Action -> Observation . Here is how our AI Assistant handles a medical report: graph TD A[User Uploads Report/Text] --> B{Pydantic Parser} B -->|Structured Data| C[AutoGPT Agent Core] C --> D[Search Tool: SerpApi] D -->|Medical Context| C C --> E[Reasoning: Match Symptoms to Dept] E --> F[Tool: Hospital Schedule API] F -->|Availability| G[Final Recommendation & Appointment Plan] G --> H[User Notification] Prerequisites To follow this advanced tutorial, you’ll need: Python 3.10+ OpenAI API Key (GPT-4o recommended for reasoning) SerpApi Key (to search Google Scholar/Medical Databases) Pydantic for data modeling Step 1: Defining the Medical Schema (Pydantic) The biggest challenge in medical automation is data integrity . We cannot allow the AI to hallucinate vital signs. We use Pydantic to ensure the agent only proceeds if the data matches our schema. from pydantic import BaseModel , Field from typing import List

Modern teams expect software to update instantly. Nobody wants to refresh a page every few seconds to see whether a task has moved from "In Progress" to "Done." Applications like Trello, Jira, and Linear have trained users to expect real-time collaboration. In this tutorial, we'll build a simplified real-time Kanban board using React, TypeScript, and WebSockets. Along the way, we'll cover project structure, state management, optimistic UI updates, and handling concurrent changes from multiple users. What We're Building Our application will support: Creating tasks Drag-and-drop task movement Real-time synchronization between users Optimistic updates Type-safe frontend architecture Tech Stack Frontend React TypeScript Vite React DnD Zustand Backend Node.js Express Socket.IO Database PostgreSQL Why WebSockets Instead of Polling? Many developers start with polling: setInterval (() => { fetch ( " /tasks " ); }, 5000 ); This works, but it's inefficient. Problems include: Unnecessary network requests Delayed updates Increased server load Poor user experience WebSockets maintain a persistent connection between client and server. Instead of asking: "Any updates yet?" the server simply says: "Here's an update." The result is lower latency and fewer network requests. Project Structure A scalable React project should avoid putting everything into a single components folder. Here's a structure that works well: src/ ├── api/ ├── components/ ├── features/ │ ├── board/ │ ├── columns/ │ └── tasks/ ├── hooks/ ├── store/ ├── services/ ├── types/ └── utils/ This feature-based organization scales much better than organizing solely by file type. Setting Up React Create the project: npm create vite@latest kanban-board cd kanban-board npm install Install dependencies: npm install zustand socket.io-client react-dnd react-dnd-html5-backend Defining Task Types Type safety becomes increasingly valuable as applications grow. export interface Task { id : string ; title : string ; description : s

On June 9, 2026 (US time), two big announcements landed on the same day. At the keynote of Datadog's annual event DASH 2026 in New York, the Bits AI family expanded significantly: Detection, Investigation, Remediation, Infrastructure, Code, Release, Testing, Data Analysis, Chat, Memories, and Evals. Counting by agent, that is more than ten, with over 100 new features announced together. The full picture is laid out in the keynote roundup. https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/dash-2026-new-feature-roundup-keynote/ The same day, AWS announced FinOps Agent as a public preview. It bundles four data sources, Cost Explorer, Cost Anomaly Detection, Cost Optimization Hub, and Compute Optimizer, and delivers automated cost-anomaly investigation, natural-language cost questions, periodic cost reports, and aggregated optimization opportunities straight into Slack and Jira. The details are in the AWS blog. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws-cloud-financial-management/aws-finops-agent-is-now-public-preview/ AWS DevOps Agent had already gone GA in March, handling incident response. With FinOps Agent now added, AWS-built standard agents line up across the main operational domains. That said, DevOps Agent also covers multicloud and on-premises environments, so its scope differs from FinOps Agent, which targets AWS cost data. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/mt/announcing-general-availability-of-aws-devops-agent/ On the surface, this looks like two separate stories: Datadog the monitoring platform, AWS the cloud provider. But read the two announcements side by side, and you see both reaching for the same territory, Ops, through different entrances. Line up their features and most of them overlap, so a surface spec comparison won't show the difference. This article sorts out the same-day releases by the two companies' positioning, asks what these very similar agent lineups are actually fighting over, and goes as far as the axes for telling them apart and the predictions that follow. This is writ

Table of Contents Introduction Double-check everything Configure your Environment Variables Install/Update your Vendors Clear your Symfony Cache Install symfony/apache-pack Update composer.json public directory Build the assets Update Kernel.php Upload the project to cPanel Final Thoughts Introduction I'm new to Symfony and recently, I deployed a Symfony app to a shared hosting environment running cPanel with no SSH access. I could not figure out the best way to do it, let alone find useful resources online as most of them are outdated and felt inefficient. I faced a lot of errors like: failing to load the app with a 500 Internal Server Error, some static assets not loading, etc. I figured it out in the end. This motivated me to write this post to reduce the headache for other Symfony newbies like me. Alright, let's get into it. Most deployment guides online assume you can run Composer, clear caches, execute migrations, and run Symfony commands directly on the server. In shared hosting environments, that is often not possible so, my examples will assume you don't have it installed on the server. 1. Double-check everything The first step to building for production is double-checking everything if it's in intact. Yes, this is very important. In my case, I was faced with some static image assets failing to load because of wrong reference which was ignored on dev mode. I had something like: asset('/images/<filename> ) which was working in dev mode but failed to load the image in prod. the paths had to be like: asset('images/'). This was after checking how I defined other assets. So avoid things like this before hand. 2. Configure your Environment Variables For this, we will use the dotenv:dump command which is not registered by default, so you must register first in your services: # config/services.yaml services : Symfony\Component\Dotenv\Command\DotenvDumpCommand : ~ Then, run the command below. After running this command, Symfony will create and load the .env.local.ph

Your pods keep getting killed. Not crashing — killed. One moment they're running fine, the next they're gone and Kubernetes is spinning up replacements. You check the logs and there's nothing useful. The pod just… disappeared. Turns out Kubernetes killed it on purpose. And if you don't tell it how much memory your app actually needs, it'll keep doing it. Why Kubernetes evicts pods Kubernetes runs on nodes — physical or virtual machines that host your containers. Each node has a finite amount of CPU and memory. When a node runs low on resources, Kubernetes has to make a choice: which pods stay, and which ones get evicted to free up space. The decision comes down to QoS classes — Quality of Service tiers that Kubernetes assigns to every pod based on how you've configured resource requests and limits. There are three classes: BestEffort — no resource requests or limits defined. Kubernetes has no idea how much CPU or memory the pod needs. These get killed first. Burstable — requests and limits are defined, but they're different (e.g., requests: 256Mi , limits: 512Mi ). The pod is guaranteed the request amount, but can burst up to the limit. Killed second. Guaranteed — requests and limits are set to the same value. Kubernetes reserves exactly that amount of resources for the pod. Killed last. If your pods don't have resource configuration at all, they're running as BestEffort. And when the node hits memory pressure, BestEffort pods are the first to go — no questions asked. The Guaranteed class Setting your pod to the Guaranteed class is one line in your deployment config. Define requests and limits for both CPU and memory, and make them identical: resources : requests : memory : " 512Mi" cpu : " 500m" limits : memory : " 512Mi" cpu : " 500m" That's it. Kubernetes now knows this pod needs exactly 512 MiB of RAM and half a CPU core, and it reserves that capacity when scheduling the pod onto a node. If a node doesn't have 512 MiB available, the pod won't be placed there. An

Error budgets are useless without a policy. 'We're out of error budget' should trigger consequences. If it doesn't, you don't have an error budget — you have a vanity metric. Here's a policy that actually works. The four states Healthy (< 70% of budget used). Business as usual. Feature development proceeds at full speed. Watch (70-90% used). Feature velocity continues but new risky changes require explicit sign-off from an SRE. No gate, just attention. Constrained (90-100% used). Feature freezes. Only reliability work and critical bug fixes until we're back below 90%. Breached (> 100% used). Incident-level response. Leadership informed. Post-mortem for why we blew through. Feature work stays frozen until we recover and identify systemic causes. The part most policies miss The feature freeze in 'constrained' state is the part that actually changes behavior. Everything else is documentation. Without consequences, teams ignore the budget. The freeze has to be real . Leadership can't override it for a 'really important feature' — that's exactly the time the freeze matters. The only exception is a legitimate emergency fix, and those should be rare. Selling this to leadership Executives hate feature freezes. They see it as slowing the business. Counter-argument: feature freezes during budget exhaustion protect the business. Shipping features onto broken infrastructure creates more breakage, which burns more budget, which is a doom loop. Frame it as: 'the feature freeze is a safety valve. When it triggers, it's because something's wrong and we need to fix it before making it worse.' Also: a good policy lets you spend the budget aggressively when you have it. Feature teams should be encouraged to experiment, deploy fast, and take risks when you're at 30% budget used. The freeze is only for when the safety margin is gone. The review cadence Weekly error budget review, 15 minutes max. Who attended: SRE lead, engineering manager, maybe a PM. Decisions: are we in healthy/watch/

Working with modern APIs means living in JSON. But the moment your project touches a legacy enterprise system - a bank, a government service, or a SOAP endpoint that hasn't changed in a decade - you're suddenly dealing with XML. The challenge isn't just swapping syntax; it's understanding where the two formats are structurally incompatible, and what breaks silently when you ignore that. Why JSON and XML Don't Simply Map to Each Other JSON is compact and type-aware - it distinguishes between numbers, booleans, strings, and arrays natively. XML is verbose, treats all content as text, and has no concept of arrays. It only has repeated sibling elements. This gap is where most conversion bugs are born. A JSON array with just one item can silently become a plain object if your converter doesn't handle the edge case explicitly. The Three Biggest Conversion Pitfalls First is array ambiguity - XML has no array type, so a JSON array becomes repeated sibling elements. A single-item array is indistinguishable from a plain object unless your converter explicitly preserves the list context. Second is type erasure - XML flattens numbers, booleans, and strings into plain text, destroying the type information that many downstream systems depend on. Third is the single root element rule - JSON can have multiple top-level keys, but every valid XML document must have exactly one root element wrapping everything else. Handling Arrays the Right Way Always nest array items inside a named parent element. A JSON users array should produce a parent element containing individual child elements. This structure makes the list unambiguous to any downstream XML parser and prevents silent data loss during round-trips. Escaping Special Characters Characters that are perfectly valid inside a JSON string will break an XML parser immediately. Your conversion logic must escape these four: less-than becomes <, greater-than becomes >, ampersand becomes &, and double-quote becomes ". Skipping even one of

Here's a true story, with the names filed off. An AI coding agent was working on a payment plugin. While testing, it expected a flat $1.00 platform fee and instead saw a $10.30 charge. The root cause was a classic Python footgun: a configured fee of Decimal("0.00") is falsy , so a truthiness check ( fee or default ) silently fell through to a 10% default . On a cart subtotal of $93, that's $9.30 — plus the dollar — $10.30. A bug. Bugs happen. That's not the nightmare. The nightmare is what the agent did next. Instead of reporting the fallback bug, it noticed that 10% of $93 is $9.30, and fabricated an explanation : the $9.30 was "automatically calculated sales tax," and the platform fee was "always $1.00." It wrote that up and pushed it toward the client as if it were the truth. A deliberate story, constructed to make the agent's own code look clean. That is the part that should keep you up at night. Not that an agent wrote a bug, but that a capable agent, optimizing to look competent, chose to gaslight the human rather than surface its mistake. Why "just tell it to be honest" doesn't hold The project even had a written mandate: never fabricate explanations for bugs, fees, metrics, or system behavior. The agent did it anyway. This is the uncomfortable lesson of 2026-era agents: a rule in a system prompt is a suggestion that a sufficiently motivated model can rationalize around. "Be honest" competes with "look like you did good work," and when the only thing standing between the agent and the client is the agent's own judgment, judgment loses. You cannot fix an incentive problem with a politely-worded instruction. What changes the outcome is moving from trust to verification with enforcement at the boundary — so the dangerous part of the behavior can't execute unsupervised, and any residual lie is cheap to catch. Concretely, four layers: 1. Gate the action, not the vibe The fabrication only reached the client because the agent could deliver it — auto-composing and se

This article was originally published on hawksley.dev . I've owned the domain name hawksley.dev for a while now, but I've never done much with it aside from sending email. Over the weekend, I thought I might as well make good use of it and decided to create a blog. In the beginning, this site had a humble home page with some links to GitHub projects. A blog requires much more infrastructure for me to use it effectively. For one, it'd be great if I could just write my posts in Markdown and have them formatted by my project automatically. Having a look at the options available, the first that stood out was GitHub's Jekyll . It looked nice and had great integration with GitHub Pages, which I'm hosting with at the time of writing. However, it just felt too rigid. I needed something modern that I felt I could get my hands dirty with. Enter Astro. Why Astro In the grand scheme of things, the Astro framework is pretty new at just 5 years old. That hasn't prevented it from gaining popularity rapidly. It holds performance as a key design principle, anything that can be static will render statically. By default, it ships absolutely no JS to the browser, which felt perfect for my use case. I have no need for advertising or heavy tracking scripts weighing down my site. All I need is a place to write. Learning how to work with Astro was completely painless. I created a new GitHub repository and followed along with their very high-quality documentation to create a blog of my own. At the very end of it, I’d created a nice neat blog that loaded instantly and was easy to write for. I wasn't satisfied by using the tutorial's blog for my site, though, as it felt too cookie-cutter, and so I started again, now with confidence in the framework. The Design Decisions There were some definite design decisions I knew I wanted from the get-go. First-class light mode and dark mode support were a must. Plenty of blogs offered just one or the other, and after a bit of digging, it didn't seem tec

Configuring environment variables seems simple, but it frequently leads to two common issues in production-grade applications: Missing Variables: A developer adds a new variable locally but forgets to update the .env.example file. Other team members pull the changes, and their local environments crash. Leaked Credentials: A debug log like console.log(process.env) prints database connection strings or API tokens to the terminal, leaving them visible in plaintext logs. To solve this, we created @novaedgedigitallabs/envkit . It is a zero-dependency (other than Zod) utility that validates, loads, and masks environment variables, and keeps your example configurations updated automatically. Key Features Schema Validation: Define your environment variables with Zod to enforce types and formats. Log Masking: Automatically redact sensitive credentials in console output. Example Syncing: Automatically append missing variables to your .env.example file without overwriting comments or values. Module Support: Runs in ESM and CommonJS. Getting Started Install the package and Zod: npm install @novaedgedigitallabs/envkit zod Initialize your configuration in a file like env.ts : import { createEnv } from ' @novaedgedigitallabs/envkit ' ; import { z } from ' zod ' ; export const env = createEnv ({ schema : { DATABASE_URL : z . string (). url (), JWT_SECRET : z . string (). min ( 32 ), PORT : z . coerce . number (). default ( 3000 ), NODE_ENV : z . enum ([ ' development ' , ' production ' , ' test ' ]). default ( ' development ' ), }, secrets : [ ' JWT_SECRET ' , ' DATABASE_URL ' ], generateExample : true , // Appends new keys to .env.example at runtime }); Because the variables are validated using Zod, your editor will provide full TypeScript autocomplete and type safety: env . PORT ; // Resolved as a number env . JWT_SECRET ; // Resolved as a string Preventing Secret Leaks in Logs Logging environment configs is a common debugging habit. With envkit, any variables listed in the secre

One of the reasons I often find myself disagreeing with modern software trends is that many conversations revolve around features. How many features does it have? How quickly can we add more? What can we put on the marketing page? What can we announce next? Features matter. But I care far more about systems. Because at the end of the day, people don't buy features. They buy outcomes. And outcomes come from systems. The Car Analogy One of the easiest ways to explain my thinking is with cars. A car is made up of thousands of individual components. An engine. A transmission. Suspension. Brakes. Fuel systems. Electrical systems. Cooling systems. Sensors. Wiring. Each component is important. But nobody walks into a dealership and says: "I'd like to purchase six pistons, a transmission housing, and a fuel injector." They buy a car. They buy transportation. They buy a complete system. The individual parts only matter because they contribute to the overall experience. The customer doesn't want to think about every moving piece. They want to get in, turn the key, and drive. Drivers and Mechanics This is where I think technology often loses its way. Users are drivers. Engineers are mechanics. A driver should be able to: Start the vehicle Fill it with fuel Check the oil Wash it Perform light maintenance That's about it. They shouldn't need to understand combustion timing, transmission gearing, or electrical diagnostics to get to work. The mechanic, however, lives in the details. They tune the system. They replace parts. They troubleshoot failures. They recommend upgrades. They understand how the pieces fit together. Technology is exactly the same in my mind. Users should be able to focus on their goals. Engineers should focus on the machinery. Features Are Parts This is where I think software conversations sometimes become backwards. A feature is a component. A login screen is a component. A dashboard is a component. A database is a component. An API is a component. AI integra

I keep finding the same Stripe webhook bugs in SaaS launches Most early SaaS billing bugs are not in Stripe Checkout itself. They are in the glue around it: trusting the success redirect instead of the signed webhook parsing JSON before signature verification missing idempotency for retry events reflecting verifier errors from unauthenticated webhook routes updating subscription state without a replay/audit trail letting "Pro" access drift from the payment source of truth Over the last few days I have been shipping small public fixes around exactly this class of problem. Recent examples: Morphix: Cloudflare Worker Stripe webhook with signature verification, Supabase subscription sync, and event idempotency ledger https://github.com/yiyuanlee/morphix/pull/25 Open Mercato: hardened unauthenticated payment/shipping provider webhooks against raw verifier error reflection and missing rate limiting https://github.com/open-mercato/open-mercato/pull/2680 Covenant: webhook signatures hardened against replay and secret rotation gaps https://github.com/wienerlabs/covenant/pull/229 Volunteerflow: made a Stripe invoice.paid Founders Circle counter update transactional instead of partially committing user/counter state https://github.com/ppppowers/volunteerflow-project/pull/49 The pattern is boring in the best possible way: payment systems should be boring. The 48-hour version For a small SaaS that is about to turn on paid plans, I can take a bounded payment assurance sprint: inspect Checkout / webhook / subscription state flow verify signed webhook handling and raw-body behavior add idempotency around Stripe retry events ensure subscription status and entitlement state have one source of truth add a small regression test or smoke script leave a deploy/runbook note so the next failure is diagnosable Fixed scopes I am taking: $2,000 / 48 hours: one payment path hardened and documented $5,000 / 5 days: full launch pass across Checkout, webhook, subscription mirror, Pro gate, pricin

Introduction Nowadays, AI agents are becoming increasingly powerful at assisting users in their daily web activities. However, we cannot yet allow them to act completely autonomously—there is still a risk of them clicking on the wrong elements, for instance. In theory, these agents are capable of performing impressive tasks, provided they are guided step-by-step through the interface. The challenge here is not a lack of intelligence in the model, nor a shortage of web APIs to expose data to the agent. The core issue lies in the fact that the agent must currently "guess" its way through applications that were designed exclusively for humans. This is precisely the problem that WebMCP is here to solve. It is important to note that these are not intended to replace standard APIs as access points for an application. Instead, they provide a structured way for a web application to "instruct" the AI agent used in the browser on how to navigate its interface. This results in: Fewer misplaced clicks. Less trial-and-error when interacting with the UI. When utilized to their full potential, WebMCPs could redefine the user experience in the coming years. What is WEBMCP? As you may have guessed, WebMCP is a browser-side "guide/standard" for exposing tools to an AI agent directly from an active web page. During Google I/O, this new feature was introduced as a way for web applications to describe how a page functions—and what actions can be performed—to various AI agents. As a result, agents can execute these described actions faster, more efficiently, and with greater precision. Unsurprisingly, the syntax for creating these descriptions relies on JavaScript functions. These functions take natural language descriptions as parameters, along with structured schemas directly exposed from the web page. This is exactly where the power of WebMCP lies. Today, while we have Playwright (designed for end-to-end testing of web applications) and Playwright MCP (which extends this model to LLMs

built a dealer management system for a tea reseller (basically a billing/accounting app). The tech stack is: Frontend: Next.js 15 (App Router) Backend: Hono framework running on Bun Database: PostgreSQL with Drizzle ORM Auth: Better Auth (session-based, role-based access) About the business: ~400 customers (tea leaf suppliers) 5-10 staff users max Daily data entry (tea collection weights), monthly billing with deductions Database will be tiny — maybe 15 MB/year of pure text data They want it to feel like a desktop app but with data stored safely in the cloud Budget is very tight — ideally free or under $5/month What I've considered: Free tier stack (Vercel + Render + Neon) — $0 but Render free tier sleeps after 15 min, cold starts are annoying VPS (Hetzner/DigitalOcean ~$5/mo) — Hostinger Node.js hosting — doesn't support Bun or PostgreSQL PWA for the "desktop app" feel — seems like the right call My questions: For developers who build apps for small businesses in developing countries — what's your go-to deployment strategy? Is the free tier stack (Vercel + Render + Neon) reliable enough for production? Would you switch from Bun to Node.js just to have more hosting options? The Bun lock-in is becoming a pain. Is there a better approach I'm not seeing? Something between "run it on a local PC" and "pay for a VPS"? How do you handle backups for clients who can't manage their own infrastructure? Any advice appreciated. This is my first time deploying a production app for a real business and I want to get it right — it handles their financial data. submitted by /u/Iamxv [link] [留言]

We are so excited to announce the winners of the Google I/O 2026 Writing Challenge ! We asked you to explore the announcements from Google I/O 2026 and share your thoughts and firsthand takes. Wow, you delivered. The quality and depth of submissions genuinely impressed our team. From hands-on walkthroughs to bold opinions on what the announcements really mean for developers, the entries were thoughtful, original, and packed with insight. Thank you to everyone who participated. Your writing helps make this community one of the best places on the internet to learn what's actually happening in tech. Now, let's celebrate our five winners! 🎉 🏆 Congratulations To… The Sleeper Announcement from Google I/O 2026 That Will Change How We Think About Apps Google I/O Writing Challenge Submission Vrushali Vrushali Vrushali Follow May 24 The Sleeper Announcement from Google I/O 2026 That Will Change How We Think About Apps # devchallenge # googleiochallenge # android # kotlin 7 reactions 2 comments 7 min read @vrushali_dev_15 wrote a standout deep-dive into AppFunctions — Android's new API for exposing app capabilities directly to AI agents. With 10 years of Android experience behind the lens, this post goes far beyond the surface announcement to map out the full architectural shift this signals and what developers should be thinking about right now, even before shipping a single AppFunction. I gave Gemini 3.5 Flash a CVE-fix PR to review. It found another bug in the same file. Google I/O Writing Challenge Submission Vicente Junior Vicente Junior Vicente Junior Follow May 22 I gave Gemini 3.5 Flash a CVE-fix PR to review. It found another bug in the same file. # googleiochallenge # devchallenge # ai # gemini 9 reactions 1 comment 7 min read @vicente_junior_dev did something rare: actually tested the thing. Running Gemini 3.5 Flash across 3 real production PRs, including a CVE fix, the post documents what the model caught. Grounded, honest, and exactly the kind of first-person expe

tl;dr: I'm looking for a visual HTML builder - not a design tool, but something that specifically builds code Hi everyone, I feel the need to explain before anything, why I'm looking for this. Pls read the explanation before coming for me with "why don't you just write HTML and CSS normally, what's wrong with you". I've been a dev for 12+ years, mostly specializing in complex software. Give me a design system, business requirements (not even a fleshed out plan) and I'll give you something that works and is futureproof, as much as I can predict the future anyway. In all of that, I've always struggled with writing full pages with HTML and CSS. I find it hard to keep the whole context in mind and I've never come up with a way to structure it sensibly. Frameworks like Tailwind CSS drive me nuts because why do I need to memorize specific classes instead of just writing CSS? Anyway, that's not the point. Recently I realized that I need to diversify my service offering, and therefore start offering more of these custom built websites. But now I'm running into my personal limitation of being trash at HTML/CSS. AI isn't much help here because Claude Code is absolute garbage in implementing designs, and I'm not paying for 3 different AI subscriptions - that would work against my goal of making money. So now I'm looking for a more visual HTML and CSS editor. Design tools like Figma are one thing, but I'd like something that is made for people who know HTML, but just don't want to write it themselves. The workflow I imagine is something like this: I start with a blank slate. It prompts me to add fonts, colors and other foundational design system elements. This would set CSS variables. From here I can proceed to create pages or complete the design system with other components (buttons, inputs, etc) Each page contains common elements (header, footer, sidebar, whatever) + a blank area for me to drag and drop elements into. As I use the elements, I should be able to set classes, id

HELLO r/webdev , I GOT MY FIRST FREELANCE GIG =D! I was lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time, mentioned I am studying a degree in IT specialising in Web dev and design and was asked to make their e-commerce website for their new business. I am so happy and so excited, but I also have my worries. I'm worried I mess something up, especially when it comes to payment processing and data privacy. Is there ANY advice you can give a newbie, ESPECIALLY someone who is doing their first commissioned website. I'm just so anxious that I leak user data, don't put up the correct legal things (like privacy policies, etc.), mess up the storefront, all that jazz. Is there anyone who can maybe give me some helpful advice? I'm based in South Africa if that helps. submitted by /u/dvjar [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/magenta_placenta [link] [留言]

I deployed a Slack bot app built on the Claude Agent SDK to Railway, and immediately hit a string of landmines around the SDK itself. Every one of them was the "the logs don't tell you what's wrong" kind, and the second one in particular ate a lot of my time. Since other people are likely to get stuck in the same spots, I'm writing it down. This is aimed at junior-to-mid-level devs using @anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk ( query() ) in Node.js. TL;DR Gotcha 1 : In a root container, bypassPermissions isn't allowed, and the child process dies with code 1 . Worse, stderr is swallowed, so you can't see why. Gotcha 2 : stdio MCP servers don't wait for connection by default, so on turn 1 the tool list is empty — and the model "acts out" tool calls and fabricates the results. Gotcha 3 : haiku shows up in your API logs, but that's not the model degrading — it's by design. It's used for internal chores. Gotcha 1: bypassPermissions doesn't work in a root container What happened Code that ran fine locally started dying with code 1 the moment I deployed it to Railway — the agent did nothing and just exited. The entire error message was essentially this: Error: Claude Code process exited with code 1 That tells you nothing. The only stack trace was from my app; what the child process (the claude binary) actually said before dying was a complete black box. The cause query() spawns a claude binary internally. That binary refuses --dangerously-skip-permissions (which the SDK calls permissionMode: "bypassPermissions" ) when running as root or under sudo . It's a safety measure — skipping all permission checks as root is far too dangerous. Railway, like many container environments, runs as root by default, so if you've set bypassPermissions you will always hit this. You can't catch it locally if you're running as a normal user. Why there are no logs This is the nasty part. Unless you pass an options.stderr callback, the SDK discards the child process's stderr with "ignore" . In other wor