标签：#c

Samsung's newest foldables are here. At Galaxy Unpacked, the company announced the Galaxy Z Flip 8, Galaxy Z Fold 8, and Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. All three devices will be available on August 7th, but you can preorder them now starting at $1,199.99, $1,899.99, and $2,099.99, respectively. You probably noticed that Samsung's foldable lineup […]

TL;DR: Use per-test coverage data to build a reverse map (file → tests that touch it). Git diff + map lookup = run only relevant tests. 43min → 4min CI time. The Problem Everyone Has Your test suite runs for 45 minutes. You change one file. Should you: Run all 2,000 tests? (Safe but slow) Run tests with matching filenames? (Fast but broken) Manually tag tests? (Gets stale immediately) We tried all three. They all failed. The Insight: Stop Guessing, Start Measuring What if we just measured what each test actually executes? Coverage tools have done this for years: { "src/MyComponent.js" : { "statements" : { "0" : 5 , "1" : 12 , "2" : 0 } } } Key insight: Coverage tools report per test run, not per test file. All we needed: save coverage after each individual test. The Architecture (5 Steps) Step 1: Instrument the Code // Build config (webpack/vite/rollup/etc) export default { plugins : [ process . env . COLLECT_COVERAGE && coveragePlugin ({ include : ' src/**/* ' , exclude : [ ' **/*.test.* ' ] }) ] } Works with: Istanbul (JS), coverage.py (Python), SimpleCov (Ruby), JaCoCo (Java) Step 2: Collect Coverage Per Test // Test framework afterEach hook afterEach ( async () => { const coverage = getCoverageData (); saveCoverage ( `coverage- ${ testName } .json` , coverage ); }); Step 3: Build the Reverse Map const map = {} ; for (const coverageFile of allCoverageFiles()) { const testName = extractTestName(coverageFile); const coverage = JSON.parse(read(coverageFile)); map [ testName ] = [] ; for (const [ sourceFile , data ] of Object.entries(coverage)) { if (wasExecuted(data)) { map [ testName ] .push(sourceFile); } } } Example output: { "tests/user-profile.test.js" : [ "src/components/Profile.jsx" , "src/components/Card.jsx" , "src/utils/formatters.js" ] } The magic: The test told us what it executed. No parsing, no guessing. Step 4: Detect Tests CHANGED = $( git diff origin/main...HEAD --name-only ) TESTS = $( lookupTestsInMap " $CHANGED " ) npm test $TESTS Step 5: Auto-Up

This is a submission for DEV's Summer Bug Smash: Clear the Lineup powered by Sentry . Project Overview I recently deployed the Dograh AI voice agent (named Zoya) live on my production website, Mobile One Media , to handle client inquiries for our 4K video production, audio engineering, and app development services. For the first 48 hours, the agent worked flawlessly. However, on day three, it suddenly stopped responding on the live site. Users were experiencing complete hang-ups when trying to navigate the service menu. This wasn't a local testing issue; this was a live production fire that needed immediate debugging and a permanent fix. Bug Fix or Performance Improvement The Problem: Issue: After ~48 hours of continuous uptime, the live Dograh AI widget on mobileonemedia.com began silently failing, resulting in infinite loading states and dropped user sessions. Impact: 100% of new agent interactions were failing, directly blocking potential client leads from contacting our media production services. Root Cause: A Docker container configuration issue combined with a system prompt misalignment. The agent's Docker environment variables were not properly persisting the workflow state, and the system prompt was failing to initialize correctly after container restarts, causing the agent to lose conversational context. Code and Video Demo GitHub Pull Request: https://github.com/dograh-hq/dograh/pull/287 Watch the live agent in action: https://youtu.be/pKUxtq8sKDs?si=r1s2LK7zGIzpd2Ry The Fix Summary: Archived the old, messy agent configuration that was causing the Docker and prompt issues. Built a brand new, clean agent setup from scratch with proper architecture. Rebuilt the Docker container configuration with proper environment variable persistence and volume mounting. Fixed the system prompt initialization sequence to ensure it loads correctly on container startup. Added health check endpoints to monitor agent readiness before accepting user connections. My Improvements

I'm the author of a paper my friends and I wrote after we were curious if a MUD, text games originating in the 1970s, could be used to evaluate LLMs. We've spent the last several months on nights and weekends running this experiment and writing the paper on just our personal computers with about $99 in API credits. Our experiment did have an interesting leaderboard but even more surprising was the measurements of each LLM. We scored each on four behavioral dimensions, two of which lean heavily o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWig98GVIno https://www.tomshardware.com/3d-printing/mit-researchers-rev... https://www.yankodesign.com/2026/05/31/a-zipper-patent-sat-i...

Those who have been following me for a while will know that teaching and mentoring are a Big Deal™️ to me. Before I got into tech I was a teacher, and still consider myself a teacher at heart. Being a teacher and mentor was never separate in my eyes from being a good programmer and engineer; on the contrary, teaching was a tool that helped me become better at my craft at every stage of the journey. But in the last few years, and accelerating in the last few months, the landscape for teaching and learning has been changing at a scary pace. The advent of LLMs and "AI" coding assistants has drastically shifted how we acquire engineering skills in ways that we are definitely not prepared for. All of that has prompted many thoughts and conversations, and I hope to distill some of them in this blog post. In true Talmudic fashion, this post doesn't contain too many answers and will hopefully leave you with more questions than you started with. But asking the questions is how we start these conversations, and these conversations need to be happening if we are to do right by the coming generation of programmers and engineers. Don't Spoon-Feed Me As a student, whether in Yeshiva when I used to spend hours each day poring over dense Talmudic legal debates and esoteric Chassidic philosophy or later while learning Rails and React at the Flatiron bootcamp, I quickly realized an uncomfortable truth about skill acquisition. My best, most profound learning never happened when a lesson went smoothly; it happened when I was painfully stuck, banging my head against a cryptic error message or wrestling with a concept that just wouldn't click (usually at 2 AM, fueled by cold coffee and sheer stubbornness). When you strip away that struggle, you get rid of the growth. And when you get rid of the growth, the learning just doesn't happen. Even if you memorize just enough to pass the test, "easy come easy go." Without that cognitive friction, the knowledge evaporates the moment you close you

Welcome to Day 2! Today we focus on two core pillars of Object-Oriented Programming: Encapsulation: Hiding internal state and requiring all interaction to go through performing validation or controlled methods. Abstraction: Hiding complex implementation details and exposing only a clean, simplified interface to the user. 1. Access Modifiers: Public, Protected, & Private 🛡️ Python does not have strict enforcement keywords like public or private found in Java or C++. Instead, it uses naming conventions and name mangling to communicate intent and protect internal data. ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ACCESS MODIFIERS IN PYTHON │ ├──────────────┬───────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Level │ Syntax │ Scope / Intended Access │ ├──────────────┼───────────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Public │ self.name │ Accessible anywhere (inside & outside class) │ │ Protected │ self._balance │ Internal & subclasses only (Convention) │ │ Private │ self.__pin │ Class internal only (Triggers Name Mangling) │ └──────────────┴───────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Public ( self.name ): Fully accessible from anywhere. Protected ( self._balance ): Single leading underscore. Signals to developers: "This is internal—do not mutate or access outside this class or its subclasses." Private ( self.__pin ): Double leading underscore. Triggers name mangling ( _ClassName__attribute ), making it hard to accidentally access or override outside the class. 💻 Code Example: Access Modifiers & Name Mangling class SecureVault : def __init__ ( self , owner : str , balance : float , pin_code : str ): self . owner = owner # Public self . _balance = balance # Protected (convention) self . __pin = pin_code # Private (name mangled) def verify_pin ( self , pin : str ) -> bool : return self . __pin == pin vault = SecureVault ( " Alice " , 50000.0 , " 9876 " ) # Public access works as expected

Yorishiro is an open source project that gives Claude Code / Codex a body-like anime character. The name “Yorishiro” in Japanese means an object inhabited by spirit. My first idea started comunicating with AI agent long time by terminal is very tired. Because AI agent is no face, no expression, no body, and I don’t see they think. So I provided a 3D body and inhabited environment to AI agent. I call it “Presence Harness”. I devise many idea, for example, reflex function. "Aura" is white light mo

The long-held understanding among security researchers and network defenders is that it's impossible to negotiate in good faith with an extortion racket because there's no incentive for the other side to actually walk away.