标签：#artificial

Prompt Logic Gates (PLG) GitHub Repository Something I've been thinking about recently. In software development, we've spent decades building abstractions to make complex systems manageable: Functions instead of repeating code Classes and modules instead of giant files Visual systems such as Unreal Blueprints, Node-RED, and LabVIEW. Compilers that validate and transform input before execution But when it comes to AI prompts, many of us are still writing massive text blobs. A complex prompt can easily become hundreds of words long with multiple responsibilities: Context Constraints Style instructions Exclusions Decision logic Fallback behavior At that point, it starts feeling less like text and more like a program. That made me wonder: Why don't we treat prompts as executable logic? Imagine building prompts using logic gates: AND → merge instructions OR → choose between alternatives NOT → remove unwanted concepts Question nodes → identify missing requirements Compiler → validate contradictions before execution Instead of editing a giant string, you'd build a graph and compile it into the final prompt. I've been experimenting with this idea in a prototype called Prompt Logic Gates (PLG) . It treats prompts like compilable programs, using concepts such as dependency graphs, execution order, semantic conflict detection, visual nodes, and compilation pipelines. such as Unreal Blueprints, Node-RED, and LabVIEW Repo: Prompt Logic Gates (PLG) GitHub Repository I'm not posting this as a product launch or anything — I'm more interested in whether this direction makes sense from a software engineering perspective. Do you think prompts eventually become a programming layer of their own? Or will natural language always be the better abstraction? Curious what other developers think. submitted by /u/withsj [link] [留言]

The latest twist in paying humans to wear head cameras for robot training data.

Cuban's take: the gap isn't access to AI tools. It's knowing how to implement them for your specific business. He's right. And the data backs it up in a specific way. We track verdicts across 70+ AI tool categories used by SMBs. The highest-volume category — Development Tools — has a 60% WORKED rate across 874 tools. Content Creation: 67% WORKED across 262 tools. AI Video & Production: 57% WORKED. But Customer Support sits at 31% WORKED despite 45 tools tracked. Email & Outreach: 30% WORKED. Marketing: 20% WORKED. Same AI. Same price points. Wildly different outcomes. The implementation gap Cuban's talking about isn't about expertise. It's about knowing that the category you're buying into has a 20% success rate before you spend three weeks setting it up. Which category did you implement where the outcome surprised you — better or worse than expected? submitted by /u/Fill-Important [link] [留言]

Or any other type of activity other than sitting in front of a computer like sitting in a park, running on a treadmill, etc? I’m curious how much more freedom from deskmaxxing people are getting today from using what’s available with build automation tools and harnesses on Claude Code, Code , Antimatter, etc. like GSD, Superpowers, Smith, Cowork, etc. submitted by /u/dennisplucinik [link] [留言]

Ex‑DeepMind researchers unveiled AI lab Inherent, emerging from stealth with a significant funding round reported at about $50 million (also reported as £40m). The startup plans to pursue AI science research and build lab capabilities to accelerate foundational work and commercialization. submitted by /u/Objective_Farm_1886 [link] [留言]

Amazon bought a 960 megawatt nuclear reactor for AI servers. Microsoft restarted Three Mile Island. Stargate is spending 500 billion dollars on data centres. All of this to do, badly, what your brain does for free on the power of a dim light bulb. The reason is that silicon processes information nothing like the brain does. Rigid chips with identical transistors trying to mimic something soft, three dimensional, constantly rewiring itself, with billions of different neurons each doing something slightly different. Northwestern University just published research showing they printed artificial neurons from MoS2 and graphene ink that produced biologically realistic electrical spikes. They tested on living mouse brain cells. The brain responded as if the signal came from one of its own cells. The breakthrough was accidental. Every other lab had been burning away the polymer residue left in the ink after printing. This team kept it. That residue created the switching behaviour that made the spikes biologically realistic. The neuromorphic computing implications here seem significant. If you can print devices that process information the way neurons do at scale, the energy math changes completely. submitted by /u/filmguy_1987 [link] [留言]

I'm creating a story for my cousin. I think it will be very interesting if this story’s main character can be a 3D character.My project is still in planning stage. I’m writing character descriptions, collecting references from Pinterest and testing some complex shapes using Tripo AI. I plan to continuously improve all the content over time. After I get a version that I like I will put it into Blender for editing and final touches.There is no final version yet but I just want to share this process with the community! I find it is so interesting to watch a story’s concept gradually become concrete lol!! submitted by /u/Final_Floor_789 [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/Hot-Upstairs9603 [link] [留言]

Read this release today. Some crazy numbers. The tau2-bench number is 98% across all difficulty levels. That is the one that got me because usually these releases post a strong easy score and then quietly die at hard difficulty. This one... claims it holds. For multi-step agent work that actually matters more than most benchmarks. A model that drifts on step 4 of a 6 step chain is a debugging nightmare regardless of what its SWE score looks like. Raw capability is mid, Toolathlon at 49.5, GDPval at 45.8. So this is clearly a reliability play, not a frontier capability play. Depending on your use case that is either fine or a dealbreaker. 198B sparse MoE 11B activ 400 TPS 256K context Apache 2.0 runs locally on M4 Max and DGX Spark. Has anyone actually put this through agent evals or am I just reading the release card. submitted by /u/Skid_gates_99 [link] [留言]

IDK I might be wrong but.....I don't think it's happening anytime soon. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini.....they are good....but they are too lazy. Gave them a task to create a Masterdata for all smartphone models being sold by a particular brand. Gave explicit instructions for all models. Explicitly asked for a list 1st and then asked it to create MasterData. Lazy ahh model just put in like 21 popular ones out of the hundreds of the available models and variants. Is this how it will overtake us and replace all the labor intensive work? submitted by /u/naamnhiptahai [link] [留言]

Hey all! This is my first time writing a blog. It is about the migration from mongoDB database to a postgreSQL one. How we changed the architecture completely using AI. Any criticism is welcome submitted by /u/SID_069 [link] [留言]

As GenAI starts flooding every platform, I’m beginning to wonder if live sports are one of the last truly AI-resistant industries. You still can’t prompt a model to recreate the real tension of a 14–14 tie-break in a volleyball final and maybe you never will. I read an interesting piece from NJF Holdings about this. Frankly speaking, I barely know who Nicole Junkermann is but she seems to be focused on AI infrastructure and sports rights in AI era. I agree with her, that the more polished and “perfect” AI-generated content becomes, the more valuable becomes true human unpredictability and even mistakes. The basic idea is that sports become more valuable precisely because they can’t be generated. Does that idea hold up, or do you think AI entertainment eventually becomes “good enough” to compete with the real thing? submitted by /u/AssistantStraight983 [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/noshameinlovegame [link] [留言]

Found this during a routine review. Analysts discovered that pasting alert context into an AI tool cut triage time significantly and started doing it because it worked, which is a reasonable thing to do when you are under pressure to move faster. The problem is that alert context includes internal hostnames, IP ranges, user identities and sometimes partial log data, none of which was supposed to leave the environment. No policy covered it because the productivity gain was not something that had been thought through when the AI use policy was written. Now trying to figure out how to give them a sanctioned version of the same capability without the data handling risk, which is harder than it sounds because the whole point is that the external tool is faster than what we have internally. submitted by /u/Only_Helicopter_8127 [link] [留言]

How does this even happen? submitted by /u/TheVirtualSamurai [link] [留言]

submitted by /u/CostaGraphic [link] [留言]

Mallika Rao discusses the hidden risk of evaluation debt in production AI systems, drawing on her experience at Twitter, Walmart, and Netflix. She explains why traditional metrics fail modern architectures, breaks down a five-layer evaluation stack spanning infrastructure and UX, and shares a diagnostic maturity model to help engineering leaders eliminate silent semantic failures. By Mallika Rao

The Cloud Native Computing Foundation has highlighted a new AI-assisted migration approach that enabled engineers to migrate 60 ingress-nginx resources to Higress in roughly 30 minutes, demonstrating how artificial intelligence is increasingly being applied to modernize Kubernetes networking and gateway infrastructure. By Craig Risi

How much of the content in Reddit is AI generated do you think? submitted by /u/Zealousideal_Can_411 [link] [留言]

Hey everyone, A while ago, we realized a major annoyance: whenever you actually need an AI to summarize a document, write some quick code, or just brainstorm, you're usually on a flight, on the subway, or dealing with terrible cell reception. And bam, ChatGPT won't connect. Plus, there's the growing privacy concern of feeding all your personal data to cloud servers. So, my team and I started tinkering with a question: "What if we just run the AI directly on the phone's hardware?" We've been spending our evenings and weekends for months trying to make this work smoothly, and the result is Cortex AI. The logic is super simple: You download a highly optimized, small-scale local model (from our library) straight to your device. Put your phone in airplane mode, go off the grid—the AI replies entirely locally. Zero data leaves your phone. 100% private. Some real-world use cases we built this for: Coding help or summarizing offline docs while on a long flight. Getting quick answers while traveling abroad without an expensive data roaming plan. Brainstorming private ideas you just don't want OpenAI or Google to scrape. Note: We do have an optional "Online Mode" if you want to connect to massive models like GPT-4 or Claude, but the local offline models are completely free, and that's what we really want to test right now. We're currently trying to gather real user experiences on the local execution side. I'm not here to just spam a link and grab cash; we genuinely want to improve the offline mobile AI space. If anyone frequently travels, camps, or just loves local LLMs, we'd be super grateful if you could test it out. Brutally honest feedback like "runs too slow on my device," "needs X feature," or "this part of the UI makes no sense" is exactly what we need right now :) submitted by /u/Virtual_Ad_6024 [link] [留言]