标签：#ai

Three big AI IPOs are set to generate more value than all the U.S. VC-backed exits since 2000.

"You promised me that you would never take power in your name."

PR volume went up, ticket quality didn't, and the gap got filled with LLMs on both sides of the review: bots reviewing, bots replying, bots occasionally arguing with bots about priorities that only existed in a teammate's head. Our CEO named the actual problem, and it's bigger than code review.

I asked AI to help me write this article. Then I sat there for a second, thinking about how ironic...

After reentering the AI race with its first in-house Muse Spark model in April, Meta is now opening up the doors to developers with a new model that can plug into AI coding software with the new Meta Model API. Meta says that Muse Spark 1.1 is a "step-change" from the first generation, with improvements […]

Today on Decoder, I’m talking with Peter Kafka, who is chief correspondent at Business Insider and host of Channels, a podcast about the media industry. And it’s a big week for the media industry — Comcast just announced that it’s splitting itself up, into the Comcast broadband company and the NBCUniversal entertainment company. That’s after […]

The Claude Reflect dashboard is like a mix of Spotify Wrapped and the screen time tool on your phone.

New York has banned smart glasses in all 1,240 state, county, city, town and village courts.

The popularity of Spotify Wrapped has kicked off a wide range of year-in-review features, on apps from YouTube to Uber - and now, the lookback trend has come to AI. Anthropic on Thursday announced a "reflect" feature for its Claude chatbot, allowing users to see an analysis of their usage data over the past month, […]

Character.AI's plan to become more than just an LLM-powered chatbot platform is going beyond interactive books, comics, and audio dramas. Today, the company announced the debut of c.ai Series - short-form, episodic videos designed to be watched and interacted with - on your phone. Unlike traditional microdrama services that feature cheaply produced, live-action shows starring […]

In an interesting twist that takes advantage of the company's core product, users can chat with these shows' characters, ask them questions, and even roleplay different storylines.

Benchmark-backed Ollama has amassed 176,000 stars, and nearly 17,000 forks on Github by helping developers easily run AI on their PCs.

Last year, Image Line introduced Gopher for FL Studio, an AI chatbot that was basically a glorified instruction manual. You asked it how to do something, and it would serve up the relevant instructions. It's the kind of thing I actually use AI for on a semi-regular basis. But in the new release, Gopher can […]

OpenSuperWhisper 评测：macOS 上最被低估的开源语音转文字工具？ 30秒结论 ：OpenSuperWhisper 是一个基于 OpenAI Whisper 模型的 macOS 原生听写（dictation）应用。如果你受够了 macOS 自带听写的间歇性抽风，或者不想每月交钱给 Otter.ai，这个免费开源项目值得一试。 但别期待开箱即用 ——你需要自己配置模型、处理依赖，而且目前只支持 macOS。 适合人群：macOS 重度用户、需要离线语音转文字、对隐私敏感、愿意折腾配置的开发者。 不适合：Windows/Linux 用户、不想碰终端的人、需要实时流式转写（目前不支持）。 核心功能：代码实操 1. 安装部署 # 克隆仓库 git clone https://github.com/Starmel/OpenSuperWhisper.git cd OpenSuperWhisper # 安装依赖（需要 Python 3.10+） pip install -r requirements.txt # 直接运行 python app.py 坑点1 ： requirements.txt 里没写版本号，我踩了 numpy 版本冲突的坑。建议手动指定： pip install numpy == 1.26.0 torch == 2.1.0 whisper == 20231117 坑点2 ：macOS 14 Sonoma 上需要手动授权麦克风权限。第一次运行会 crash，因为没处理 PermissionError 。workaround：在 System Settings > Privacy & Security > Microphone 里手动勾上终端或 Python 的权限。 2. 基本使用 启动后会在菜单栏出现一个小图标（类似 macOS 原生听写）。快捷键是 Option + Space （可自定义）。 核心逻辑：按下快捷键 → 录音 → 松开 → 调用 Whisper 转写 → 结果写入当前光标位置。 代码层面 ，核心函数在 whisper_handler.py 里： # 简化版核心逻辑 import whisper import sounddevice as sd import numpy as np class WhisperHandler : def __init__ ( self , model_size = " base " ): self . model = whisper . load_model ( model_size ) self . sample_rate = 16000 def transcribe_from_mic ( self , duration = 5 ): # 录音 recording = sd . rec ( int ( duration * self . sample_rate ), samplerate = self . sample_rate , channels = 1 ) sd . wait () audio = recording . flatten (). astype ( np . float32 ) # 转写 result = self . model . transcribe ( audio , language = " zh " ) return result [ " text " ] 实测 ：默认 model_size="base" 时，中文准确率约 85%。换成 "large-v3" 能到 92%，但首次加载要 2GB 内存，转写一条 10 秒语音需要 8-12 秒（M1 Pro 芯片）。 3. 自定义快捷键 config.yaml 里可以改： hotkey : modifier : " option" key : " space" model : size : " base" # 可选: tiny, base, small, medium, large-v3 device : " cpu" # 或 "mps" (Apple Silicon) output : paste_delay : 0.3 # 转写后粘贴延迟，防止焦点丢失 注意 ： device: "mps" 在 macOS 14.2 上会报 MPS backend not available 。需要安装 PyTorch 的 MPS 版本： pip install torch torchvision torchaudio --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/nightly/cpu 性能测试 测试环境：MacBook Pro M1 Pro (

When people picture "coding," they picture fast typing and features coming to life. Nobody pictures the real majority of the job: staring at a stack trace or lets say a particular project trying to figure out why something that should work, isn't. Here's what nobody tells you starting out — getting good at debugging has almost nothing to do with how well you write code, and everything to do with how well you read. The real difference between beginners and experienced devs isn't complex knowledge — it's that experienced devs read carefully and form a hypothesis before touching anything. Beginners (me included) tend to skip straight to changing code and hoping. It feels faster. It rarely is. One thing i'd like to advise other fellow beginner devs is ....Slow down, read the error properly, and follow the stack trace to where it actually starts — not where it ends up. What's a bug that taught you this the hard way?

Autonomous agents are starting to trade real money on-chain. Some run their creator's capital, some run other people's, some are wired into vaults and DAO treasuries. The moment money is delegated to a program, two questions matter more than performance: what was it allowed to do, and did it stay inside those limits? Supported chains: Base · Ethereum · Arbitrum · Optimism · Polygon · Hyperliquid · Solana (beta). The chain answers the first question badly and the second not at all. Every trade an on-chain agent makes is public and tamper-evident — you can see exactly what it did. But nowhere on-chain is it recorded what it was authorised to do . The mandate — the rules the agent was supposed to operate under — lives off-chain, unverifiable, usually as a screenshot or a claim. Why this is not a niche problem Copy trading is the same gap at retail scale, and the data is unforgiving. In a 90-day study of 100,236 copy-trading outcomes, 97% of lead traders were profitable on their own PnL — but only 43.6% produced positive PnL for the people copying them. Fewer than half of copiers (48.5%) finished in profit at all. Leaderboards, as that study puts it plainly, show the survivors, not the full picture. The honest response the industry already reaches for is third-party verification: in forex, platforms like Myfxbook exist precisely because a self-reported track record is worth nothing — the data has to come from somewhere the trader can't fake. Crypto has no equivalent that is both agent-native and tamper-evident. That is the hole. Who actually needs this Three groups, concretely: Anyone allocating capital to an agent — a vault depositor, a copy-follower, an allocator sizing a position. They want to see, before they commit, whether an agent keeps to its stated mandate, instead of trusting a screenshot. Anyone running an agent who needs to raise capital or followers — an honest operator has no way today to prove their agent did what it said. A verifiable record is how they

Filingrail now ships a first-party MCP server on PyPI: pip install filingrail-mcp . One install, one config block, and Claude Desktop — or Cursor, or Continue, or any MCP-compatible client — can query SEC filings as tools. No glue code. That's worth naming directly. Most SEC-data APIs ship a REST endpoint and stop. You write the agent integration yourself: parse the response, wire up the tool schema, handle auth headers. Filingrail ships the integration as a maintained package with the same update cadence as the underlying REST API. This post covers the setup, what you can ask once it's wired in, and the honest limits. I built both the API and the MCP server — I'll be upfront about that throughout. This post covers a data API that returns SEC-registered financial information. Nothing here is investment advice. Two ways to wire it in Option 1 — pip install filingrail-mcp (recommended) Install the package, add one block to your Claude Desktop config, restart. Filingrail's endpoints appear as tools. No separate service to run, no background daemon. Option 2 — RapidAPI MCP Playground tab (no local install) The Filingrail listing on RapidAPI has an MCP tab that generates a ready-to-paste config block. Same endpoints, same auth, zero install step. Either path gives Claude the same tools. Pick the one that fits your setup. Setup — the pip install path You'll need Python 3.10+ and a RapidAPI key. 1. Subscribe to Filingrail Go to the Filingrail RapidAPI listing and subscribe. Free tier is 50 calls/day, no credit card. Copy your X-RapidAPI-Key from the RapidAPI dashboard. 2. Install the server pip install filingrail-mcp 3. Add Filingrail to your Claude Desktop config On macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json On Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json { "mcpServers" : { "filingrail" : { "command" : "filingrail-mcp" , "env" : { "RAPIDAPI_KEY" : "your_rapidapi_key_here" } } } } 4. Restart Claude Desktop Filingrail's endpoints appear a

With increased adoption of AI, there is often an argument that code-reviews are now the new bottleneck. And I agree with this completely. Code-Reviews, especially the review you do yourself after AI has written your code, take time. But I would object to the notion that this is a bad thing. What is a bottleneck? A bottleneck is something that slows down the process. It becomes a point where work must get in a line, to pass through a narrow space. With the speed of AI producing code, code reviews become a bottleneck. But is having a bottleneck in the process always a bad thing? The value of slowing down I can only speak from my personal experience of developing software for roughly 7 years now. But in my experience, slowing down is not always bad. On the contrary, it can be very healthy. When you slow down, and take the time to really think about things, you often come up with insights that you would not have if you always rush through things. And these insights can be golden opportunities to change something for the better. Be that a subtle bug discovered, be that a design flaw addressed or something else - the list is long. But as British computer scientist Tony Hoare famously said: "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies." But simplicity is hard "I would have written a shorter letter, but did not have the time." If it was Mark Twain or Blaise Pascal who said it is beside the point. The point is, there is a lot of truth in this quote. A writer of prose I know also confirmed what many senior software engineers know - to make something complex simple and easily comprehensible takes way more time and effort in the form of careful thought than it takes to leave it being complicated and hard to understand. AI is good at writing code quickly, yes. But is it also good at writing code which has high q

Nilekani remains Fundamentum's anchor investor as the firm expands its leadership team and targets AI and fintech startups in India.

SpaceXAI has rolled out Grok 4.5, the first model it trained with Cursor.