标签：#AR

Until we get something like ::nth-letter , there are still some really cool text effects we can make from existing CSS features, like letter-spacing , ::first-word and ::first-line . Revealing Text With CSS letter-spacing originally handwritten and published with love on CSS-Tricks . You should really get the newsletter as well.

Vision Transformers waste 90% of their compute recalculating stationary asphalt. NeuroFlow tracks semantic surprise in embedding space, physically eliminating background tokens before the encoder. Result: 55.8x wall-clock speedup for ViTs on high-res video (1792p) with 97% fidelity. No fine-tuning required. NeuroFlow is a dynamic routing framework for Vision Transformer video inference. It exploits temporal redundancy by tracking per-patch semantic surprise via an Exponential Moving Average (EMA) of patch-level embeddings, effectively answering the architectural mismatch between O(N2) self-attention and highly redundant natural video streams. Key Contributions Architecture C (Dual-Memory Reconstruction): A completely training-free inference engine that combines a Layer 0 Retinal Gate with a Layer 12 Cortical Cache. It achieves 71.55% zero-shot top-1 accuracy at 84.0% token sparsity on SigLIP, retaining 92.4% of dense accuracy without modifying any weights. Architecture B (Extreme Wall-Clock Speedup): Physically eliminates stationary tokens before the encoder. With sparse manifold distillation, it reduces 1792p SigLIP 2 inference from 678 ms to 11.9 ms—a 55.80× wall-clock speedup at 97.37% embedding fidelity. LLM Ablation: Characterises the architectural boundaries of applying similarity-gated bypass to autoregressive language models (Phi-3-mini), demonstrating 0% token drift in syntactically constrained generation. Code and paper: https://github.com/ynnk-research/-NeuroFlow submitted by /u/Bobby-Ly [link] [留言]

I’m a new mom who left my white collar job to be a SAHM but planned to return when they reach kindergarten age. Everyday I spiral thinking I made the wrong “financial” choice to be a SAHM instead of advance my career, I fear my job won’t exist in 5 years, and what will my child’s future look like? I feel like my algorithm definitely makes things worse! Does anyone else think about this stuff constantly? submitted by /u/properlass [link] [留言]

Follow-up to my earlier post on learning rules vs. human fMRI. Same five conditions (BP, FA, PC, STDP, untrained), same model weights, now evaluated against macaque V1/V2 (FreemanZiemba2013, single-unit) and macaque V4/IT (MajajHong2015, multi-electrode). Main findings: Early visual alignment is qualitatively conserved across species. STDP (ρ ≈ 0.30) and PC (ρ ≈ 0.28) lead at macaque V1/V2, consistent with their position in human V1. The pattern isn't an fMRI artifact. The untrained baseline result doesn't replicate cleanly. In human fMRI, Random ≥ BP at V1. In macaque, STDP and PC pull ahead of Random (electrophysiology has enough SNR to resolve the difference fMRI can't). IT alignment scales with capacity, not learning rule. ResNet-50 (pretrained, ImageNet): ρ ≈ 0.25 at macaque IT. Custom 3-conv CNN across all learning rules: ρ = 0.07–0.14. The IT convergence from the companion paper looks like a capacity floor. Cross-species IT rankings: Kendall's τ = 0.00 (p = 1.00) but n = 5 only has power at τ = ±1.0, so this is uninformative rather than evidence of non-conservation. Limitations worth noting: V1/V2 and V4/IT come from different macaque datasets with different stimulus sets (textures vs. objects): the V2→V4 drop is confounded by this switch Stimulus control shows IT rankings are weakly inverted across stimulus sets (τ = −0.40), so cross-species IT differences may be partially stimulus-driven Companion paper: arxiv.org/abs/2604.16875 Cross-species paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22401 Code: github.com/nilsleut/cross-species-rsa Happy to discuss the stimulus confound issue or the capacity control in more detail. submitted by /u/ConfusionSpiritual19 [link] [留言]

Profiling PyTorch training has an interesting measurement problem: the more you measure, the more you can change the behavior of the run itself. A simple example is torch.cuda.synchronize() . It gives cleaner timing boundaries, but it also inserts synchronization points into an otherwise asynchronous CUDA workload. An alternative is to use CUDA events around selected boundaries and read them later, so timing can be captured without forcing synchronization in the hot path. This does not replace PyTorch Profiler or Nsight, but it can work as a lightweight first pass before deeper operator-level profiling. I wrote a short technical note about this while working on an open-source PyTorch training diagnostics tool: https://medium.com/p/19adf1054bcf submitted by /u/traceml-ai [link] [留言]

I’m a chronic overpacker, but this backpack is my perfect match, with its huge capacity, numerous pockets, and impressive durability.

The company is mapping Alexandria and, soon, Arlington—right across from the power center of Washington, DC.

The feds are raising the alarm about a new category of threat.

Corsair unites Stream Deck functionality with Drop keyboard design expertise on its latest Galleon SD 100.

Microsoft added sandboxed code interpreters to Azure Logic Apps, enabling agents within integration workflows to generate and execute Python, JavaScript, C#, and PowerShell in Hyper-V isolated sessions. Architects get full control over model selection per workflow. The capability positions Logic Apps as an agent platform for integration alongside Foundry and Copilot Studio. By Steef-Jan Wiggers

Most tooling discussions I come across just end up being the same handful of products getting recommended over and over. Gets old pretty fast. More interested in the stuff flying under the radar. Repo and coding tools, self hosted setups, AI infra, terminal utilities, debugging tools, smaller projects that just do their job well. The kind of thing you only stumble on if you're deep in it. What have you actually been reaching for lately? submitted by /u/Meher_Nolan [link] [留言]

An octopus about the size of a golf ball was first spotted in 2015 near Darwin Island. A new study gives it both a formal description and a name.

Aaron Erickson discusses the evolution of AI workflows, shifting from "vibe checking" to building reliable, multi-agent frameworks. He explains how to combine deterministic software guardrails with agentic discovery, optimize agent hierarchies, leverage time-series foundation models, and implement rigorous evaluation pyramids to ensure architecture scales effectively in production. By Aaron Erickson

Deep Research Agentic Systems are AI Agents designed to conduct multi-step research for complex tasks using dynamic reasoning, multi-hop information retrieval, and generate structured analytical reports. Sarang Kulkarni from Thoughtworks spoke at Arc of AI Conference 2026 on how to deploy multi-agent research systems for deep reasoning, and the lessons learned from developing Deep Research Agents. By Srini Penchikala

submitted by /u/esporx [link] [留言]

https://preview.redd.it/ww14mzr2fm3h1.png?width=1890&format=png&auto=webp&s=79873d47ae79c7815ca3e7e91fd43141632174f5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr_uS4bf0B4&feature=youtu.be trained a 7MB open-source L4 self-driving AI that learns navigation, lane following, and drift recovery directly from visual and sensor input. designed for real-time autonomous driving on lightweight edge hardware like phones and embedded devices, without massive server-scale infrastructure. submitted by /u/moorish-prince [link] [留言]

I’ve spent the last few weeks obsessing over one goal: having a personal, self maintaining AI assistant that costs $0and can be controlled from my phone. It wasn't easy. I started with an AWS Ec2 with 50GB storage and t3.micro memory- minimal setup (using the free credits) and made Oracle Cloud instance ($300 free credits but just for a month so I used it for experimenting with local models) I was using Termius to SSH into everything from my phone At first I used OpenClaw. It was cool, but I spent more time fixing it than actually using it. I almost gave up until I saw a video about Hermes Agent. And i actually found Hermes while looking for how to fix an OpenClaw error on YouTube (thanks NetworkChuck 🙌🏽) He mentioned the exact same frustrations I was having, and that Hermes had been stable for a month. I didn't even finish the video before I pulled the repo. The best part? It had a "migrate from OpenClaw" feature. I was up and running in minutes. The hardest part is the rate limits. If you use cloud models especially for code, you hit a wall fast. My solution? The Fallback Chain. Initially I was using openrouter/owl-alpha (stealth models are usually flagships in testing, like big-pickle is deepseek v4) which has 1M context window and was on multiple rankings. Over time after I transitioned to Hermes, I wanted a bit more customization, while owl alpha was good at tasks, It’s nothing to talk about on roleplay, it just scrapes the surface of the character I set in SOUL md file. On my oracle instance I had been experimenting with local models (keep in mind, if you go local, you’ll be sacrificing speed but privacy. Ofc since the vms don’t have a gpu it would be slower, about 3-5 minutes for a simple response) The one I was most impressed with is Google’s Gemma-4-31b-it It played the role perfectly Buuut if you know Google, you’re familiar with their aggressive rate limiting. So I set up my agent to rotate through providers. I start with Gemma 4 for that perfect personal

Hi everyone, I'm finishing up my proposal for my undergraduate thesis for computer science on sign language recognition, specifically Filipino Sign Language and i want to ask what architecture to use for my methodology that is best, rn im considering Mediapipe Holistic + Transformers or Media Pipe Holistic + Mamba SSM. The only caveat is prev researches already done the first one and im not very familiar with the latter. Which do you think is the best method? Thank you submitted by /u/Unable_Let_6998 [link] [留言]

We're writing a research paper on explainable fraud detection GNN model and in the first step we're creating a basic Graph Neural Network for that. We're using the most famous dataset available on this topic i.e IEEE CIS Fraud Detection Dataset and implemented all necessary feature engineering on that data (although majority of feature engineering is already performed in the dataset). Then we constructed a heterogeneous graph on that dataset. Various transaction features like device, transaction id, amount are embedded as nodes and connected with transaction nodes. But the issue is after training the model isn't performing well. It is producing average AUC of 0.87, PR-AUC of 0.52, recall@5% around 0.57 and precision@5% around 0.37 (We tried GCN, GraphSAGE and GAT, all performs almost same for rest data) Whereas the SOTA models in this topic produce much better metrics. Can anyone tell where potentially we're doing things wrong? submitted by /u/LiveAccident5312 [link] [留言]

Discover exclusive Hostinger promo codes, discounts, and deals on web hosting, cloud plans, and domain registration. Save big on your next Hostinger purchase today.